Baby Squared

Nested

Lately, I've been seriously craving a vacation somewhere warm. This isn't that shocking, I guess, given that it's about 10 degrees outside, there's snow on the ground, and we've still got two and a half months of winter to go. A few days ago, on a lark -- or perhaps just to torture myself -- I priced out how much it would cost, with airfare, for our whole family to go for a few days to one of those "Beaches" resorts in the Caribbean -- the kind where childcare is offered during the day. Um. Yeah. That's not happening any time soon. I can't quite believe that ANY family has a spare seven to ten grand to plunk down for a few days in the sun. But such families apparently exist. If you are one of them, I hate you. Just kidding.

 

Of course, when I really thought about what going on such a trip would entail -- namely, dealing with two 2-year-olds (un potty-trained, mind you) in airports, on planes, in wet and sandy bathing suits, requiring paid babysitters at night, etc. I realized that what I would really like is to be teleported instantly to a tropical resort -- all four of us and all our crap, plus a fabulous nanny who'll work for room and board only -- and I want someone else to pay for it. Perhaps the federal government? In short, I don't want to do any of the work of actually planning and orchestrating a trip. I just want to be somewhere else for a little while, and have it be perfectly easy. A vacation from reality, you might say.

 

Five, ten years ago, my need to escape would have manifest itself in an entirely different way. You'd find me haunting the Lonely Planet web site, browsing travel guides in bookstores, researching airfares, making theoretical packing lists. About once a year, I used to get an all-out case of wanderlust. Much of the time, I acted on it. Between the ages of 18 and 32, I managed to get to Jamaica, Ireland, Cameroon, France, Guatemala, England, Italy, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Mexico, Italy again (honeymoon), the Dominican Republic, France again, the Netherlands, and Scotland, in that order. Not to mention countless parts of the United States. Some of the trips were of the shorter, more touristy variety, while Cameroon was a whole semester abroad, and the trips to Guatemala and South America were solo adventures -- me, a backpack, and my Spanish verb conjugations, trying to get by on a few dollars a day.

 

I got what I can only describe as a high off of travel. And not just from the destination itself, but from all of it: the planning, the research, the airports, the uncertainty. I thought that I always would. But I can honestly say that right now I have little to no desire to jet off to Iceland or explore eastern Europe or volunteer in the Himalayas -- all things I've wanted to do in the past. I guess it's in part because none of these things would be logistically and financially possible for me now, given that we've got two little ones at home. But the fact is, I just don't have the wanderlust I used to. I like being home with my family. I like our routine. I don't feel that old urge to adventure and explore; to be the "other" in an unfamiliar place.

 

People always say that when you have kids your priorities change. I always believed that this would be the case for me, too. What I didn't anticipate, though, is that I wouldn't be particularly unhappy about it. I'm glad I made travel a priority when I was younger, but I certainly don't mourn that time in my life. I don't ever look at myself now and say, "Who is this person, with her job and her mortgage and her husband and children, who hasn't put a stamp in her passport for three years?? It's so terribly sad and pathetic!" I am perfectly content with where I am and what I'm doing. Yet, if my 22-year-old self saw me now, I'm sure she'd be shocked. Not at the fact of having a family, etc. -- I always knew I wanted that eventually -- but at the fact that I wasn't also tormented by a need to travel.

 

I like to think that someday my wanderlust will return. I look forward to taking Elsa and Clio on trips when they're older, and I hope we'll have the wherewithall to do it. I have hopes of doing some (much shorter-term) solo travel again, and certainly there are lots of places I'd love to go with Alastair. But all of it feels quite abstract and far off in the future. For now, I'm homebound -- and surprisingly content that way.


 

Leaving Scotland, in 2006. I think I sensed that it would be my last time abroad for a while. A month and a half later, I would be pregnant.

 


+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US

Comments

 

Melissa said:

I don't know if it has to do with having a family or with age.  I was really restless in my 20s, much less so in my 30s and pretty relaxed in my 40s.  If I can go somewhere, fine, if not, it's cool.  Maybe it's a little of both.  I do look forward to taking Michael different places.

January 15, 2009 8:51 AM
 

Marie Eve said:

7 to 10 grand? I, too, have been eyeing these Beaches ad (presented at the beginning of each Sesame Street episode!) with envy... Not gonna happen! Personally, a good dose of winter delusion is what gets me through.

January 15, 2009 10:23 AM
 

snickollet said:

I was a serious world traveler, too, and now the vacations I fantasize about are similar to yours. Cruises are my top call these days, not that I will be taking one, but it sure sounds nice.

I, however, still feel the wanderlust very strongly, and can't wait for the day when it's logistically less stressful to take the kids someplace exotic. We're getting there.

January 15, 2009 10:34 AM
 

knockedup said:

Yeah, I'm in the same place.  My husband keeps having elaborate travel fantasies about going to Asia or Chile (baby one and baby two in tow) and I try not to screetch, "With two kids in diapers?  Are you mad?  I can't even make it to the art museum!"  I love the idea of traveling while the kids are young, but the practical side - bottles, diapers, where to sleep, time changes, etc. - overwhelms me.  

January 15, 2009 11:47 AM
 

Carole in Korea said:

We've lived overseas for ten years now.  Used to get down to SE Asia at least once every six months. We live in an area where we are the only foreigners and are treated as exotic by the locals.  

Now that we have a toddler, we're about to move back to Canada for good.   What are we moving to?  Maybe a really nice trailer park with a library close by, TONS of Family nearby, and a job at my uncle's shop.  Good bye maid/nanny, job where people bow at me, urban lifestyle, hello normalcy and perhaps poverty.  

We're so looking forward to it.  

January 15, 2009 6:40 PM
 

MommyAmy said:

I just thought I'd pipe in with a suggestion.  How about a Disney Cruise?  They have child care included, fabulous food, areas where you can go on the ship w/ no kids around, beaches, etc.

My hubby & I have been on two Disney cruises sans kids and had a fabulous time.  And having been there, I think it'd be totally doable with kids too.

Oh, and you certainly won't have to spend $10k.

January 15, 2009 11:05 PM
 

April said:

Yes for Disney Cruise. Have not been but researched it as an option for our honeymoon going without kids (I am a disney addict) and it sounded really fun.  

I am the opposite. I like vacations and going somewhere new and interesting. However I have always had HIGH anxiety levels and I have to plan and overplan everything or I have a nervous breakdown. So any vacation I have ever taken is researched extensively, planned out perfectly, all very touristy and safe.

I was a Spanish Major who refused to do studying abroad because I could not handle the unknown of living with a strange family, eating strange food, not knowing how to get anywhere or where I was, dealing with lots of strangers. Not for me. Funny thing is I still ended up making higher grades than the others who did study abroad so I guess it doesn't improve your knowledge that much!

I think multiples require organization above all else. Actually all motherhood requires organization above all else. Sure love is second important...but love won't make sure enough diapers are packed, food is served on time, favorite toys are not lost or fogotten.  My father and his boyfriend were going to get married in California and he wanted all of us to fly down for the wedding....I would lie awake at night thinking about how in the world I would get us all down there with all our stuff that we require. Kinda relieved that won't be happening now due to prop 8 but they still might do Boston so we will see.

January 16, 2009 12:00 PM
 

Roper said:

Re. the Disney Cruise....that probably would be a nice, easy way to take a vacay with young kids, but honestly, I just don't know if I could handle it.  The thing is, I get majorly claustrophobic on boats. And I know cruise ships are huge, and I've never actually been on one, so I shouldn't judge, but I've just never really liked boats except as a means of getting from one place to another, preferably in under an hour.

April: you said it. Organization is so key. And hey, if you end up coming to Boston for your dad's wedding, let me know! Maybe we can get our kids together for a play date. (Chaos!)

January 16, 2009 8:04 PM
 

April said:

will do!

January 16, 2009 10:20 PM
 

Lauren said:

Forget the family trips (no, they're not "vacations" when the kids are young) until the girls are much older.  So not worth it.  Get your folks to babysit and just go some where local with Alastair for a little r&r.  You need it!

January 20, 2009 7:53 PM

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Add

About Roper

I'm an advertising copywriter, wannabe novelist, mother of twins, musician's wife, bleeding heart and wiseass.

in

About the Blogger

Jane Roper

Jane Roper in Boston

One baby? Piece of cake. Try two. This working mother gives you the inside scoop on the ultimate in extreme parenting: twins.

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage