Baby Squared

Positive Reinforcement

We're trying to do more of this around the Baby Squared household, as a means of fending off the whacking, kicking, hair pulling, whining, shouting, pants-pooping and other nastiness that seems to have proliferated 'round these parts over the past month or so.

 

Partially as a result of the suggestion made by several fabulous readers/commenters on this very blog, we got ourselves a couple of "Responsibility Charts" by Melissa & Doug. (This is not a paid endorsement, however if Melissa & Doug, Inc. would like to send me some free stuff, I'd be more than happy to be a total blog whore and write about it here.) There are a bunch of "responsibility" magnets to choose from, ranging from very preschool-appropriate stuff like "keep your hands to yourself" to stuff I hope we won't have to use for awhile, like "Don't use bad language." Next to each one, there are spaces to put happy face magnets.

 

There are also a couple of blank responsibility magnets you can write stuff one (dry erase!) so on each girl's chart there's currently one magnet that says "Poop in potty." (This is still a bit of an issue for Elsa.) Alastair pointed out that "potty," probably would have been sufficient. But I say, anyone who comes into our home had better be prepared for the fact that poop is a frequent point of discussion.

 

When we first put the charts up, we made the obvious, idiotic mistake of putting them low enough on the wall that the girls could reach them. Naturally, they thought they were toys and started moving all the magnets around. (Duh.) Now, they're high enough up that only Mommy and Daddy can reach. So, we now administer magnets for good behavior and aborted bad behavior, and shamelessly dangle the promise of magnets in front of the girls as an enticement to -- to choose a random example -- poop in the potty. Or say please and thank you, or pick up their toys when we ask them to. 

 

We'd been a beet stymied by how to deal with the "things not to do" categories, as in "no whining," and "keep your hands to yourself." We were sort of working on the idea that we'd award a magnet if, for example, the girls managed to work out a hair-pulling / pushing / hitting bout on their own, without parental intervention, or if they nipped a whine in the bud when it was pointed out to them. But that didn't seem quite right, so now we're trying to focus on "catching them being good." (Thank you, to the potential babysitter we recently interviewed, who gave us the term!)

 

This morning, for example, I saw what could have been a potentially violent situation resolve itself quite beautifully. Elsa was sort of bopping a toy on Clio's head -- lightly, and Clio was laughing -- but it was the sort of thing that I could tell was about to turn ugly. Then, Clio said, as reasonable as can be, "I don't want you to do that, Elsa," and Elsa, by God, stopped doing it! It was miraculous. And I told them so (in slightly different words) and gave them each a magnet for keeping their hands to themselves.

 

We haven't quite figured out the best way to tie the number of magnets to an actual reward (beyond the magnets themselves) but Alastair tried telling them they needed to get up to ten, and they'd get a treat (i.e. a piece of Halloween candy), and that seemed to work well. It's also an excellent excuse to hang onto all the Halloween candy just a leetle bit longer. For them, of course.

 

It is kind of funny, though, to look at their charts, and see all the magnets lined up for the "easy" stuff like brushing teeth and picking up toys. (And, in Clio's case, pooping on the potty. (Can I manage to say "poop" ten times in this post? If I can, I'm going to give myself a Reeses!) I kind of feel like we should tie the rewards to a distribution of magnets across the more challenging categories as well. It's quite the science.

 

But we're not only relying on the chart for positive reinforcement. We're trying hard to vocally recognize good behavior in general. Not that we haven't always, to some degree, but it seems more important than these days. We're pretty pooped out from having to be constantly reprimanding and warning. It makes us feel like jumping off the poop deck of very large ship. (One big enough to have a poop deck.)

 

Shoot. That's only eight. 

 

Poop. poop.

 

Mmm....candy.



+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US

Comments

 

Annie said:

Challenge extended: Poop Haiku! (Poop 17 times doesn't count!)

November 6, 2009 7:13 PM
 

Alli said:

Ah, the wonderful world of discipline.

In an effort not to add too much the multitude of "never-fail" discipline techniques that all parents (and teachers of young children) are bombarded with, my general rule of thumb is that different strategies work for different children.

That being said, positive reinforcement is never a bad idea. I will always throw in an enthusiastic "potty high five" after a successful potty event (hell, I've even been known to break into a "pooping on the potty" song on occasion).

My one reservation about the responsibility chart (and maybe also an explanation as to why bad language is included but potty is not) is that it can be hard for some young children to understand and be motivated by delayed gratification. This type of "working up to a reward" can be more useful for slightly older children.

With little ones I have generally found immediate natural consequences to be more effective, i.e. if you don't poop in the potty then it's your job to clean yourself up after an accident. I, of course, will supervise the cleaning up and provide quality control when needed, but the brunt of the work is done by the child. For some children, it only takes a few accidents for them to learn that it's better to poop in the potty, for others it can take longer.

I'll be curious to know how Elsa and Clio respond to the responsibility chart, and I commend your willingness to try different techniques!

November 7, 2009 2:39 PM
 

Rachel said:

We generally try to use positive reinforcement, but it's so easy to slip into nagging and punishment instead.  We successfully used a sticker chart with Evie when she was almost 3, but it was for a particular purpose (no screaming, crying, whining, hitting Mommy's hand, etc, when having her hair washed - it was a big issue for us).  If she finished a row on the sticker chart, we took her to the bakery and bought a cookie.  When she finished the whole chart (6 rows), we went to the book store and bought a new book.  It worked!  I was worried that we would have to keep using the chart or she would slip back into the undesirable behavior, but she didn't!  After 1 chart, she was doing great with hair washing and we didn't need to start a new chart.  

I've seen those responsibility charts and always wondered how they worked for young kids since they have so many different categories.  I like the concept, though, and would be interested to hear how it goes!

November 7, 2009 4:33 PM
 

Lena said:

I *almost* went out and bought those, but I think I'll wait a few months until my girls are closer to Elsa and Clio's age (plus, they were kinda expensive). So, keep us posted!

November 7, 2009 7:02 PM
 

April said:

I definitely think the charts work wonderfully with older kids, not as sure how they work with toddlers.  Anything you try is worth a shot right?  Best of luck with it! :)  

November 7, 2009 9:15 PM
 

Melissa said:

Michael doesn't poop in the potty (or in his case, toilet) regularly either.  If he's in the tub or otherwise naked and it's imminent, he will go on the toilet, but otherwise he'd rather drift off to quiet part of the room and go in his pants.  During clean up I will remind him about the benefits of going in the toilet.  I have decided to let it go for awhile until he's ready.  He peed in the toilet when he was ready, so I figure he'll poop when he's ready as well.

I agree with others that charts probably work better with older kids, but it all depends on the kid, I guess.  My neighbor potty trained with a star chart and it worked for them.

poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop

CANDY TIME!!!

November 9, 2009 9:33 AM
 

Marie Eve said:

Great, great, great idea... We should do that sort of thing more. I'm always amazed at the simple and concrete things they do at daycare that seems to work wonders: putting on a kitchen timer for tantrums and toy sharing, lining up the whole day's schedule on the wall with all the steps in different drawings, and a movable arrow showing the kids where they're at and what's next...

November 9, 2009 12:41 PM
 

Patty said:

We're currently working on our potty reward system, which is definitely being exploited in the innocent-and-yet-not way that only a cute little munchkin can manage.

He's shown that he'll delay his gratification -- a little piece of chocolate is his reward for potty success, and after having his first taste of M&Ms at Grandad's earlier, he asked if he could wait and have his reward over there, to get the M&Ms.  So I'm formulating a plan to involve coupons or something to save up and get his reward at certain intervals; maybe at dessert times or something.

Let us know what you come up with!  It sure is helpful!

November 9, 2009 8:24 PM
 

mama de marlie said:

a magnet for poop

a magnet for no whining

a treat for ten poops

(i never did get the spirit of haiku down but it feels like good exercise to keep trying)

November 11, 2009 1:36 PM

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Add

About Roper

I'm an advertising copywriter, wannabe novelist, mother of twins, musician's wife, bleeding heart and wiseass.

in

About the Blogger

Jane Roper

Jane Roper in Boston

One baby? Piece of cake. Try two. This working mother gives you the inside scoop on the ultimate in extreme parenting: twins.

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage