FameCrawler

Brangelina Under Fire: Globe-Trotting Is Bad Parenting, Says Expert

Posted by HerBadMother

 

So, let's say that you're a mega-rich, uber-fabulous, superstar family that jets around the world making movies and adopting children. Let's say that in that in a span of two years, you've lived in six different countries, and crossed the Atlantic more often than you've crossed a street in any one city. And let's say that although your eldest child is enrolled in school, he's only enrolled in any one school temporarily, and changes schools as often as you change households, which is pretty often.

If all of those things are true, then you're probably the Jolie-Pitt family, and one New York psychotherapist has some harsh words for you:

"(They're) not creating a stable environment outside the family unit," Manhattan-based psychotherapist/social worker Puja Hall told the New York Post. "Maddox is an adopted child, so he already has a sense of abandonment," she said. "Kids that constantly move are like army brats, in that very often they don't want to open up to people. They feel loss, and there is a problem with attachment."

"With the moves, the kids just don't invest in relationships, because they're going to lose them anyway," Hall said. "They think: 'Why bother? I'm not gonna stick around. We're gonna pick up and go, and the loss of friends is painful.' " She added that before Pax, 3, Zahara, 2, and Shiloh, 16 months, get any older, Angelina and Brad need to decide where to settle down. "It needs to be weighed," said Hall. "At some point, they will have to make some important choices so the kids can form those bonds and keep them."

I don't know. On the one hand, I see her point: kids who move around a lot don't have as much opportunity to form attachments. Sure, they have each other, and their no-doubt doting parents, but the lack of other stable, ongoing social relationships - with friends and playmates and teachers - must certainly be experienced as a loss, even if it's a loss of something that they've never known.

On the other hand: we're talking about Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt here, people. They can buy their kids friends.

What do you think? 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

lolaway said:

I agree and disagree.  On one hand to be able to travel all over the world and stay at the best hotels, villas, attend the best schools would be great.  But what about the friendships these kids lack?  The stability?  I say these kids are going to be messed up.

October 19, 2007 4:51 PM
 

Sassy said:

I smell therapy in a few years.  And lots of it.

October 19, 2007 5:18 PM
 

Juli said:

I agree with the psycotherapist.  They need a stable home base.  There's no reason that they can't go on trips and vacations, especially during the summer months, and have all those fabulous travel experiences.  I think kids need to be able to develop relationships outside their immediate family so that they can learn to trust and respect and love other people.  It's a terrific self-esteem builder.  Money buys a lot, and as we can see reading famecrawler every day, it doesn't buy love, respect, self-esteem or stable relationships.

October 19, 2007 5:23 PM
 

DSF said:

They certainly have a life which does not resemble mine. At all. These children might end up a bit nutty and there is surely some instability in their lives, but this social worker has never met them at all. "Maddox is an adopted child, so he already has a sense of abandonment" with no qualifiers? Not a "probably..." or an "is likely to..." If someone who had only seen my family life in pictures decided to judge me in print, tell me I was raising my kids wrong, and diagnose them with abandonment issues, I would take serious offense.

October 19, 2007 5:30 PM
 

Jen said:

Well, DSF, you do make a valid point in stating that this therapist has only seen the Jolie-Pitt family in pictures.  However, attachment issues are a HUGE problem for adopted children, and the SW's statement probably isn't much of a stretch.  I, for one, do hope the Jolie-Pitts settle into a homebase soon; I agree that it would benefit their children profoundly.

October 19, 2007 5:48 PM
 

Autumn said:

There are millions of stable, loving, healthy army brats out there who are doing just fine.  Things change, people move.  They have the same parents, siblings, nannies and probably tutors and playmates.  Next teh experts will say they were better off in orphanages.

October 19, 2007 7:12 PM
 

Sid said:

Is it just me or does it look like one of the kids is biting that guy's hand? Maybe it's a symptom of that abandonment thing....

October 22, 2007 3:41 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage