FameCrawler

Are you just trying to make a flip joke or do you really not understand what the situation is with him?　Reproductively he is still a female so the baby could come out just as "pretty" as any other baby comes out.  

This is not really a man...."he" is a woman that has had her breasts removed and now has facial and armpit hair...if I had my boobs removed and grew a beard...it still wouldn't make me a man.....she has all her female reproductive organs including her vagina...so tell me again....how is she a man?  So what is the big deal about giving birth...women do it every day.

Couldn't agree with you more domestic goddess. Part of the thing is, this couple is courting the press and milking it for all it's worth.

Hell, I refer to myself as the King Of England but that dont make it so.  A lesbian couple has a baby.  So what.

domestic goddess, time to do some reading to educate yourself, my dear.

all I know is that is a really gross picture.

It's not just that he refers to himself as a transgendered man--people can call themselves whatever they like. But he has been legally declared a man, because that's what allowed him and his wife to marry. So what I don't get it how he was able to have tha happen, when he never actually had a sex change. Regardless of what you identify as, and what you wish to call yourself--from a biological standpoint, if you've got a vagina and a uterus, you're female.

I hope this couple now decides to drop out of the limelight so that their little girl can have a normal, non-public childhood.

Educate me, Sadie.

"He" has fallopian tubes, produces eggs, has a uterus and a vagina....how is this not a woman? Someone explain it to me. Why is it such a big deal for this birth?  Women give birth every day....only difference is the facial hair and not being able to breast feed...oh, and all the media whoring.....

Man or woman.....I feel sorry for how this baby girl is going to grow up....life is hard enough w/out additional baggage....especially this kind of baggage.