Babble

a magazine and community for the new urban parent

FameCrawler

Pictures Of Nicole Kidman's Sunday Rose-Two Stories

Posted by trix

 

Is Nicole giving away pictures of Sunday Rose because she couldn't find a buyer?

I have heard two different stories about Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban's "decision" about little Sunday Rose's debut in society. I'll lay them out for ou here so you, the informed reader can make your own decision.

The well known story is that Nicole and Keith want to take the high road and not sell pictures of Sunday Rose. They are going to distribute the first snapshots of their munchkin for free. They say that they aren't like the celebrities that make deals for pictures of their precious offspring. They are putting off the image that they are better than the average bear.

A source says, "They don't think it's appropriate to make deals,they are still deciding how they feel about (it)."

The lesser known story is that a source close to the situation told Perez that Kidman's camp has reached out to several of the celeb mags. We're told, "she wanted too much money" and when she didn't get the price she wanted, she "decided to walk away from negotiations instead of taking a lower dollar figure."

So did Nicole want to stoop to level of getting some money for pictures of Sunday Rose and couldn't get any takers and then make herself look worse by lying to make herself look better? Is she claiming she's better than that by saying she wants to give her pictures away.

At least Angelina and Brad come right out and say, we'll think about all offers and give a just so you know we're going to give the money to charity. 

I just don't know what to think.

Related Stories: 

First Official Pictures of Jessica Alba's Honor Marie-When?

First Photos Of Maddie Briann, They're Official!!

Angelina Jolie Twins Photos: SOLD!!!

 
Source /Source

Photo 

 




Comments

 

bean said:

I think I believe Nicole on this one.  She does have way more money than the other B-list twits that pimp out their baby pictures.

July 16, 2008 9:10 AM
 

Dani said:

I believe Nicole also on this one. She didn't sell her wedding photos. She has a ton of money. Doesn't need the publicity. AND when Bella and Connor were small she was fiercely protective of their privacy. You rarely saw photos of the kids and if you did they were from telephoto lenses. Also, I heard the figure she is supposedly asking for is $3 million--I can't believe People or Okay wouldn't pay that.

July 16, 2008 1:06 PM
 

Paula said:

I think Mr. and Mrs. Urban are godly people and do not want to exploit their precious child for a fee.  They are kind and caring people and cherish their privacy while still pleasing their many fans too.  Everyone wants to see the pictures of their baby and I am postive the price would be very high, so the comment that they weren't offered very much is a ridiculous statement sounding idiotic ro me.  The article here is quite bias against the Urban's sounding hostile and stupid.  Blessngs to Kieth and Nicole and baby Sunday.  

July 27, 2008 12:03 PM
 

Shellsye said:

Perez hates Nicole Kidman, so I wouldn't believe anything he says because he started the rumours that she was having a boy just to try and ruin Nicole and Keith's secret joy.

What a jerk.....he needs to stop trying to be a celebrity wanna be.

July 27, 2008 10:46 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • drool.icio.us

    The top million must-have baby products.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage