Oh the plot thickens on the "Babygate" Sarah Palin baby mystery. Whether you believe that Sarah and husband Todd are actually the birth parents of Trig Paxson Van Palin or you believe he is the biological son of their teen daughter Bristol (unlikely), it is a bit odd that Trig's birth is NOT listed on the public records calendar of the Mat-Su Regional Medical Center.
That must be "proof" right? Uh, sure?
Palin was due on May 18th, however, she had (if you're going with that theory) Trig on April 18th, at 6:30 a.m. at the Mat-Su Regional Medical Center. But, baby's birth and details are not listed HERE on the public records calendar. Maybe it's nothing, but maybe it is. If you type Trig's name in the search area, it says 'no babies entered yet.' Perhaps, they're a few months behind in updating their public records? Or maybe if you're someone who has a little pull, you can ask to have that information removed? I don't know.
During an energy conference in Texas, Sarah's water broke - reportedly just a slow leak - and she later got on a plane to return home, although she never told flight attendants that she was 36 weeks pregnant and that she was leaking amnotic fluid (one would think you'd mention it incase something were to happen, then staff would be aware?), but she says, neither did she try to hide it. Hmm, interesting.
I don't know, it seems like a far-fetched story that Sarah would pretend to be pregnant to hide her daughter's pregnancy, and now that her daughter is actually pregnant (five months along), how could she have just given birth in April (if that is indeed when Trig was born) and then immediately be pregnant again? Doesn't add up. But why is Trig's birth not listed?
And, does any of this have anything to do with the presidential election and whether or not Sarah Palin would make a good Vice President?
[Source/Photo]
Related Posts:
Vetting Sarah Palin: Like Forgetting Sarah Marshall, but Funnier