Bigot Bridget Bardot Mouths Off About Sarah Palin
Bridget Bardot, who rarely comes out of her house, is coming out to attack GOP VP candidate Sarah Palin. The actress (and bigot) says in an open letter to Palin:
“I hope you lose these elections because that would be a victory for the world. By denying the responsibility of man in global warming, by advocating gun rights and making statements that are disconcertingly stupid, you are a disgrace to women and you alone represent a terrible threat, a true environmental catastrophe.”
Bardot continues on, slamming Palin for her stance on Arctic oil exploration and for dismissing the need for protection for polar bears and their natural habitats.
“This shows your total lack of responsibility, your inability to protect or simply respect animal life,” Bardot says.
And the “lipstick on a pig” statement? Bardot says, “I know them well and I can assure you that no pitbull, no dog, nor any other animal for that matter is as dangerous as you are.”
Bardot, who has been prosecuted before for hellaciously bigoted attacks on Muslims, must think that the world gives a shit what she thinks. Like most actors and actresses, she should really just stick to her job – or ex-job – and speak only the words that are written for them.
Related Posts
And Now For the Evening Gown Portion of the Competition
Who Are You Wearing? Oh, it’s Barack!
Tina Fey is Sarah Palin on SNL Debates – Video
Sarah Palin Was Annoyed. Oh, THAT’S Why She Sucked!
Homer Simpson Fulfils His American Duties
Sandra Bernhard Axed From Benefit Because of Sarah Palin Joke
As for Bridget
Actually, Bridget Bardot is an extremely intelligent and articulate woman who has balls enough to say what she thinks and to mean what she says. Bridget is not necessarily a bigot and does not apparently discriminate against anyone. She has simply spoken openly about an observation that reflects what many open, tolerant and intelligent people think but may not vocalize.
Throughout history, the population of one country has invaded another country because they wanted to claim territory in the new country for their benefit. In many cases, the invading country, imposed their language, traditions and religious beliefs on the defeated nation against the will of the people. It happened quickly and in most cases very violently.
Throughout history, people have chosen to move to another country because they wanted to adopt that country’s native language, religious practices, traditions, style of dress, etc. For whatever reason, they were not happy in their native country. No problem practicing their native language and traditions at home, but they embraced the core “public” culture and fabric of the new country. This includes the native language(s), dress, food, traditions, etc. that give that country a unique, strong and proud identity and create cohesion among the population. The foreigners assimilated because they wanted to. In this day in age, many foreigners move to another country BUT continue to behave the same way, to think the same way, to dress the same way, to speak their native language, and to practice the same traditions of their native country openly and publicly in the new country as though they never left their homeland. In certain cases this includes some very strict religious beliefs and practices that dominate their native culture and that do not mesh well with the cultural practices of the new country. The new country now appears as an extension of their homeland and the native inhabitants may become a little uncomfortable as the identity of their homeland appears to change without their consent.
Back in the day, native inhabitants may have addressed this as an invasion. The only difference is that today it comes at a slower pace and it is legally allowed. The foreigners are aware that they are protected and that there is no longer a need, or desire, to assimilate. They have now claimed a piece of territory in a new nation and they invite their friends and family to come along to do the same. The fabric of the nation changes, social programs originally intended for and paid by the native population become overburdened, cohesion among the population becomes lost and conflict may begin. Those natives that voice concern over losing their country
parker how dare u say that bridget bardo his not a lady!! obviously u no nothing about bridget! shes very talented lady who cares about the suffering of animals!so keep ur stinking comments in america u no nothing and bridget bardo is still very sensual and beautiful!!and ur breath stinks of filthy words!like palin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So what DOES the Vice President do all day? Damned if I know. I doubt most Americans know, either.
Sarah Palin is wildly unqualified for the office of vice president. One job of the VP is to be ready to take over the presidency in the event of the passing of the president. Huh? A few months ago, she asked, “just what does the vice president do all day?” The fact that John McCain asked her to run for this office is almost surreal. There are so many intelligent, knowing, experienced, balanced republican women that were passed over for reasons only McCain knows.
I am a Democrat, philosophically, and could never vote republican. But, even the most well-known and dyed-in-the-wool republican partisans decry McCain’s decision on this one. Sarah Palin defines the extreme side of the GOP. The late Jerry Falwell injected religion/evangelicism into politics many years agol. It has taken its toll on both parties, dividing them in some cases mercilessly and has altered the democratic process horribly. Hopefully, the nation can recover and we can return to being Americans with a wealth of respect for each others opinions without the division and hate that born-agains have injected into the process.
PALIN SEEMS TO BE AN IDIOT
Sarah palin is a Lady, of which Mrs. Bardot knows nothing about. Sarah Palin has Godly morals of which Mrs. Bardot has none. Sarah Palin is a breath of fresh air, of which Mrs. Bardot.s breath stinks to the lowest-hell. Everyone brags about Mrs. Bardot past beauty, but as you can now very well tell, has been lost in her older days. As for as physical beauty is concerned, Mrs. Bardot and her admirers can only glory in her vain past. Let Mrs. Bardot keep her stinking comments to where she now lives, and we Americans will choose whom we will. Let Mrs Bardot stay with the animals of which she is in better company with. The wild beast can understand her better, and it does not bother them that her breath stinks from the filthy words she has to say about others. Signed by “A Red-blooded American!”
I like BB and I think that she is making good points. She may be a bit out of touch in some ways but does have redeeming characteristics. Sarah Palin, on the other hand, does not.
Dear Pot,
Meet Kettle!
Love,
HkR
PS. Palin gives me nightmares.
This is absolutely ridiculous. Bridget Bardot saying Palin is a disgrace? come on. Bardot is a former sex icon, that’s how she made her money. Now she just finds random issues to support. Palin is a role model becuase she represents the 21st century woman: one who is a leader, clearly knows politics to a T, yet still raises a family.
I agree that Palin is total disgrace; not only a disgrace to women, but a disgrace to the human race…Not even sure she is human, look plastic and fake to me!
Sarah Palin is racist. After the meetings the crowd walks away so charged, so provoked that violence is expected. Watch out. I would not be surprised to know that she is hoping ?
um no. Palin is making women look bad by being a terrible, flighty role model for women. As women, we do not have to support her because she happens to be a female; that would truly be sexist.
I’m no fan of Palin, but this attack is just harsh. The irony of it is that Brigette Bardot, a woman, is making women look bad by saying that Palin is a disgrace to women.