FameCrawler

Octuplet Mom Nadya Suleman Has a $500/Week Nanny?

Posted by trix

 

Nadya Suleman is turning out to be a liar liar pants on fire kind of girl. 

She gave her first interview for the UK, to The Sun and let them in on all kinds of info that she hasn't told the American media.

Nadya says that she can't remember the last time she went on a date and to think of dating now would be incredibly selfish.

I think she has the selfish angle covered.

She also says it's been years since she has had sex. She said, “Boyfriends? I think I’d have to be extremely selfish. I cannot maintain a social life and be a mother. To even take one per cent of every night and devote it to someone else, a stranger, would be wrong. I have to wait for that until my youngest have left school. I can’t leave someone else trying to care for my kids while I date.” She claims she isn't going to date until the octuplets are 18.

I don't think that will be a problem. There are a lot of men out there that won't get involved in a relationship with a woman that has 1 kid, let alone 14.

She says she does have a nanny that she pays $500.00 a week to help with the 6 kids at home.  Nadya says, “The nanny is very, very helpful. She works overtime and doesn’t ask for more money. She does 12-hour days.”

Who is this nanny, and why haven't we seen her before? Nadya tries to make it look like she's doing it all on her own. She's not!

I'm not sure where she is getting the money for the nanny, because with her $1900 in disability per month and $490 in food stamps, she doesn't have the money to spare.

Elijah, her oldest son has ADD and has to attend a private school so he can focus. She is going to have to put Aidan in a special school because of his Autism, if she wants to see him thrive.

Though NBC says they didn't pay her anything, an insider says that the request put on the table to film the ultrasounds/birth and interview was 1.2 million dollars. ABC and Oprah left the room but NBC stayed to play.

She has to have money coming in from somewhere secret.

What else has she lied about? More to come. . .

Related:

Octo-mom Nadya Suleman - Loving Mother or Professional Moocher?

Nadya Suleman's Sperm Donor - Tricked!

Nadya Suleman-Sold Out by Her Own Mother!

Nadya Suleman and the Octuplets - Their Story

First Pictures of Nadya Suleman's Octuplets

Octuplet Mom Nadya Suleman Received $300,000 For NBC Interview?

Is Nadya Suleman in Hiding?

Nadya Suleman - Octuplet Mom Won't Receive Freebies

Nadya Suleman Exclusive Interview on Dateline - Video

Source


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

maeby said:

wow. she certainly does lie a lot! At least its good to know someone else is helping out with the kids.

February 14, 2009 7:27 PM
 

Margorie said:

She lies and I am sure she must be having sex somewhere at her age.  At 33 she ain't waiting until the kids are l8.  She should be in parts of China where you are only allowed one child and then what?  I am beginning to hate this woman.  She reminds me of someone I know that is a user just like her.  There are a lot like her but you may not know them.  They laugh while we pay.

February 14, 2009 8:22 PM
 

Rosanne said:

Nanny - I can't believe now she says she has a Nanny for her kids at $500.00 a week.  She is a damn liar.  The money is coming from somewhere and she ain't suffering.  Unbelievable.

February 14, 2009 8:34 PM
 

Sam said:

The reaction from comments on this site and most others is a clear indication of what's gone wrong with our spoiled, self-centered society here in the wealthy West. People think it's irresponsible to bring kids into the world if you can't 'provide' for them (meaning, if you can't afford all modern conveniences and designer labels and big house so every spoiled little brat has his/her own bedroom, right?).  Those same people probably think it's preferable to have both parents working (thus, spending very little time actually parenting) so that there's no chance they'll get a red cent of others' tax dollars. (Let's throw it all into bailing out poorly managed corporations or, better yet, financing war.) What's happened to our priorities?? I'll bet the people who ran Enron inspired far less vitriol than Ms. Suleman. Shame on you all!

February 14, 2009 9:36 PM
 

Alizarin said:

Sam, I disagree!  Nadya admits to needing help to raise the 6 children she had before the octuplets, so how is she going to do it now?  And how is she going to afford feeding and clothing 14 children when she claims to have no income?!  

She's the selfish one working the media to try to sell herself as a "poor me" and rake in as much as she can.  How is that not selfish?  We, the taxpayers, are going to end up paying for her children.  How that isn't shameful, especially when there are many families trying to provide the basic needs (home, warm inexpensive clothing, food, school supplies) for their own children?

February 14, 2009 9:56 PM
 

Mildred said:

I truly believe that Nadya has a split personality.  I believe one of her personalities is Natalie (her real name) who is the poor person she portrays to social services when she goes down begging for money for herself and the kids (when she leaves the Nanny home), and then there is Nadya (the alter ego) who has the french manicure, the different voice like Angelina, the Nanny and book offers and much more.  I am not a shrink but I think I hit the nail on the head.  We have another Sybil.

February 14, 2009 10:14 PM
 

Charlotte said:

A lady by the name of Mildred commented on maybe Nadya has a "split" personality.  Which personality then is the one that  is having sex (as most 33 year olds do)? Is it the "poor" one as she stated...or, is it the celebrity monger - Nadya/Angelina clone?  

February 15, 2009 9:40 AM
 

Corrine said:

Such bitterness, is so sad :( Every child is a blessing and it getting donations will help support her children then she is a good mother for doing it. I think I am reading alot of jealous mean things here. Who cares if she has sex or not. How can anyone of you hate someone you do not know. She has children that are beautiful. The only people donating are the ones that are ok with this. So if she is getting rich on the donations it says alot of people think that it is just fine. Just because you may have a problem raising one or two kids does not mean that someone else can not do it. USA has no problem paying for wars, so why not something as beautiful as children.

February 15, 2009 1:00 PM
 

Jeannie said:

I think we need to look at society that allows child abuse. Yes, this is child abuse, she is abusing her six children and now eight more. Sam, you are wrong. This isn't about bail outs, big money or coprporations. This isn't about the ability to provide designer labels to our children. This is about a person with no income, no hopes for income and no way to provide diapers. She is 100% unable to provide the love, comfort, security and support needed for these children. She claims she doesn't collect welfare! Bull! SSI, which she collects on three children, probably eight more when they leave the hospital, is Social Securities welfare. Social security is collected from income generated throughout your lifetime. For those that were unable to or did not work and needs social security they draw from the welfare portion of social security, not social security disability, but social security income. SSD payments vary depending on how much you paid in, SSI is a set amount that does not vary, and when you get any other form of money the SSI payments are decreased. So, she is drawing welfare.

The way to prevent this from happening again and endangering future children is, once it has been proven that the doctor was neglegent in his actions by implanting too many eggs or by allowing a single unemployed mother/father to implant more egss, he should then be held responsible. By that I mean, his license revoked and he should then be required to financially support these children. This would then remove the burden from society, provide support badly needed for these poor little victims and stop any other fertility specialist from making the same bad decision.

When a man impregnates a woman he is financially responsible for that child. Well, this man impregnated this woman I feel he is financially responsible for all these children.

February 15, 2009 2:32 PM
 

Melba said:

Three hundred thousand dollars is a lot for one interview.  Doesn't she have to pay taxes on that money?  I would think that 20% would be correct.  I bet she ain't never gonna pay a dime on it.  And, we is paying.

February 15, 2009 4:32 PM
 

Carrol said:

This woman is a complete leach on society, a liar, selfish, greedy, narcissistic, opportunistic, lazy, ugly, and the scum of the earth. She did this whole thing for notoriety and money. Anyone who falls for her crap by giving her money is an idiot. Her kids should be taken away and adopted out to families that are desperate for even one child. I feel for the citizens of California who now have to foot the bill for this selfish bitch.

February 16, 2009 12:01 PM
 

Millicent said:

I get the feeling this bitch is laughing at all of us under her breath.  Read through her eyes if you can and dare to.  How many other Nadya's/aka Natalies are walking amongst us now?  We don't need anymore.  She will take those new 8 babies to the doctor and I bet she finds that at least 4 of them have disabilities.  She knows how to play the game to get them into the system I bet.  She will never have to work again after the book deals come in.  Oprah, I am proud of you for having turned her $2Million demand down.  I have new found respect for you.

February 16, 2009 1:36 PM
 

Pat said:

Who is paying for the 500.00 a week nanny, the california taxpayers ???

February 16, 2009 4:49 PM
 

pamela said:

I think that everyone who has said this bitch is a narcissist creep has hit the right assumption on her.What i can't believe is this idiot of a doctor who should beyond a shadow of a doubt have to pay for this because it is not just the state of california that will have to pay for this every decent working person out there that pays federal taxes will have to pay for this ( bastards )meaning the idiot doctors little experiment  & what about this donor .Well i think he should pay  also thats what he gets for allowing his sperm to be used because they are so called good friends ..BULLSHIT wake up america we have been scammed yet once again don't try to tell me he or this doc didn't know what could happen please lets not be stupid forever they should all pay for this  NADYA THE GOOD OLD DOC & THE DONOR SO CALLED JUST FRIEND but mostly that dam doctor ..As far as i am concerned this doctor should do jail time.. Millicent i agree with you HURRAY FOR OPRAH she has class and i am so proud of the woman..

February 17, 2009 8:14 PM
 

evita said:

KILL HER!

February 22, 2009 11:23 AM
 

barbara said:

put her in the south east mountains with the Jukes and the Kalikaks

February 24, 2009 11:17 AM
 

Lia said:

While I agree with what some people are saying about the fact that none of us actually knows Nadya and therefore we cannot know the kind of person she is, I have to say this: people would not be judging her if she had not brought children into the world that she expects others to feed and support. If you had 14 children and the money to support them, I would applaud you! I would wonder how you got any sleep at all, and the logistics of raising 14 kids would boggle my mind, but it would be YOUR decision, YOUR responsibility to deal with the consequences, and YOUR right to do as you wished.

Nadya, however, has NO INCOME other than what she has borrowed (student loans and help from her parents) or begged (food stamps and taxpayer-funded assistance for her medically challenged kids, and the donations she solicits). She is raising 6 children under 7 in a 3-bedroom house. Where does she plan on putting the other 8- in dresser drawers?

She could not provide decent living conditions for her 6 children, but she managed to pay for expensive IVF treatments. She denies having plastic surgery, but there is clearly a difference between her “before” and “after” photos. How did she pay for these surgeries? How could she justify spending that amount of money on herself, knowing that her children needed more space and better care? Even if she DIDN'T have the surgeries (which I highly doubt), how could she justify the IVF treatments under those conditions?

Her mother’s house is about to be foreclosed- she could have spent her surgery/IVF money on helping her mother financially. But no, she had to have “just one more child”, as if supporting 7 children with no income would have been perfectly fine. Is this the attitude we should be encouraging? And that's not even mentioning the fact that the taxpayers are forced into footing the bill! She deserves all the fury directed at her!

And why did she do all this? She says she loves children and wants a big family to make up for the fact that she had no siblings. Newsflash: if you love children as more than playthings, you make sure you can meet their needs. Even if Nadya were a multi-millionaire with the resources to raise 14 children (with the help of nannies and assistants and the like), her kids would never have their need for quality time with their mother met. It is not humanly possible to give 14 children the attention they deserve- there are just not enough hours in the day! Yes, other parents (ie: the Duggars and the Gosselins) have had large numbers of children- but watch their shows. None of their kids get enough of the one-on-one attention that they so sorely need and deserve. And pressure is put on the older siblings to parent the younger ones, depriving the older kids of their right to a childhood.

Nadya KNEW she could not support her existing children, but chose to bring more into the world anyway. She KNEW this, but her need to have a big family outweighed her children’s needs for food, clothing and shelter. That is the most selfish act I can imagine. This woman is obviously narcissistic, irresponsible and childish in the extreme. If what she was looking for was unconditional love, she should have bought a puppy. But then, if she were to have 14 puppies without proper facilities and resources to raise them, the state would intervene and take them from her- why shouldn’t her children be protected in the same way?

So when people say that we can’t judge Nadya because we don’t know her, I agree. If we DIDN’T know Nadya, it would be unfair to pass judgment. But it becomes clearer every day that we DO know Nadya- we’re just disgusted by what we see.

February 27, 2009 3:19 PM
 

Salma said:

Wow, I'm amazed by all the hatred.  It truly saddens me.  We all agree that she shouldn't have had those babies, but now what.  How is belittling this women going to help those babies.  And someone needs to have Evita arrested, I thought it was illegal to treaten someones life.  I suggest taking all that negitive energy and doing something positive with it.  And say a prayer for those babies.

February 27, 2009 6:11 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage