FameCrawler : InTouch Weekly

Britney Was Raped/Was Britney Raped?

HerBadMother — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:30:00 GMT

The headline on the latest issue of InTouch Weekly: WAS BRITNEY RAPED? Which, you know, is just a little bit horrifyingly provocative.

There's no word yet on what the basis for the story is (rumors were floating around last month about the possibility that Britney was raped 'at a club' and that this was why she shaved her head, but those rumors didn't go anywhere - until now?) but some people are already up in arms over the headline itself. Are you ready for this? Perez Hilton is outraged that InTouch Weekly would publish such a gruesomely titillating headline unless it were certain - CERTAIN - that it were true:

This is so gross!!!

Why do these rags insist on doing shit like this????

In Touch put Britney on their new cover with an attention-grabbing headline that reads, "Was Britney Raped?

WTF???

Why put in the question mark there?????

They should either know she was or wasn't. Why put this story out there if it wasn't true or if they had doubts about its authenticity?????

Oh, wait, we know why.

They wanna sell magazines!!!!

So disgusting.

We don't wanna question marks in covers! We want to know that what we're reading is FACT!

Somebody please tell me that he's being ironic here. Otherwise - fat gossipmonging pot? MEET KETTLE.

Source

Tori Spelling: Bump And Boobs In A Tank Top. IN FEBRUARY.

HerBadMother — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:22:00 GMT

You know what bugs me most about this photo? It's not, contrary to what you would expect, Tori Spelling in all of her fake-boobed, sullen-faced glory.

It's that Tori Spelling in all of her fake-boobed, sullen-faced glory gets to wander around in the sunshine - IN A TANK TOP AND FLIP-FLOPS OH MY HELL - while I have to sit here in sub-zero temperatures, watching the snow blow outside my window and wondering whether or not the facking groundhog lied when he convinced everybody that facking spring was coming early this year.

LIFE IS NOT FAIR.

Source

Tori Spelling's Bump On Display: Guess This Pregnancy's Confirmed

Tori Spelling Pregnant Again

Tori Spelling's Bump On Display: Guess This Pregnancy's Confirmed

HerBadMother — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:02:00 GMT

Okay, wow. That's some bump for someone who hasn't even officially confirmed that they're pregnant yet. I'm pushing six months, and my bump is about that size. My boobs are bigger, though. Also, they're nicer, if I do say so myself.

Any guesses on how far along she is?

Source

Tori Spelling Pregnant Again

HerBadMother — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:10:00 GMT

Oh, huzzah. Tori Spelling continues to breed. According to InTouch Weekly, she's pregnant with her second child.

I know, that sounds bitchy, and it's probably unwarranted, but whatever. She's not high on my most-love celebrities list, at least not since she enabled Dean McDermott's abandonment of his family. Also, she has a really bad boob job, and that shit just irks me.

Still: new life, reason to celebrate, blah blah blah. So I guess congrats are in order: way to go, Tori and Dean. Congrats on the spermination. Keep this one off reality TV, will you?

Source

Britney: Everybody Loves A Pregnant Klepto!

HerBadMother — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:33:00 GMT

Britney Spears a kleptomaniac? That, at least, was the story this morning from a Swedish newspaper, which reported that Britney lifted four designer coats from designer Katja Berglund at the Scandinavian Style Mansion party in LA this past weekend. The coats were worth a total five-finger discount of $28,200.

This of course, was too ~~good~~ bad to be true, and sure enough, the newspaper just issued a retraction, stating that the designer has insisted that the coats were a gift. Which, yeah right. I'm betting that 'statement' from the designer came after some well-placed phone calls from Britney's publicists. This is, after all, a girl who has let her dog shit on couture and who - inexplicably - recently tried to make off with some (presumably useless) un-paid-for panties. And tell me that she and baby-daddy JT Rotem don't look like they're shoving merchandise under their fugly hats in that photo above.

She should just be blame it on pregnancy hormones. Oh mah god, y'all! I just can't be THINKIN' with all this sperm cooking up in me! I thought they was MAH coats, y'all! That way, she gets more of our attention (admitting to pregnancy) and our sympathy (poor pregnant Britney, lost and confused.) And she gets to keep the coats, and maybe the panties, too. Win-win for everybody.

(Source; Photo)

Britney Spears Text Messages Ryan Seacrest To Squash Baby Rumor But More Lies Surface

Karen — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:35:00 GMT

What is it with Ryan Seacrest getting all the Britney attention? Anyway, that nagging rumor about her being pregnant again? False, according to a text message sent from the pop trainwreck to the radio show host this morning. BUT WE AREN'T BUYING BRITNEY'S STORY JUST YET!

From Sam Lufti herself: "It's BS, don't know who made it up. J.R. doesn't even know what's up. It's fake, completely fake. We just wrapped her video, going home to sleep...sorry...we're dodging paps."

And apparently Britney is furious, and planning to sure, says a source, "She's furious at InTouch," a close pal of Britney reveals to OK!, referring to their item that the mother of two is expecting a child from music producer J.R. Rotem. "The story is a complete lie. She does not even see or talk to J.R., and she hasn't had any dealings with him in months."

"She's thinking about suing," explains the pal. "She's so mad. She's worked so hard at being a working mom and resolving legal issues. To have such a messed up lie come out like this now really angers her. She is serious about wanting to sue."

Oh REALLY? Months you say? Funny, here she is with J.R. Rotem SIX WEEKS AGO.

Squash that, Pop Tart.

Somebody Stop Her: Britney Spears is Pregnant With J.R. Rotem's Baby

sweatpantsmom — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:55:00 GMT

From the "Don't Forget to Spay and Neuter Your Pets" Department: InTouch Weekly is reporting that Britney Spears is pregnant with music producer J.R. Rotem's baby. The magazine will report in its upcoming issue that on November 14 Spears confided to her friends in e-mails that she was four weeks pregnant and that she was certain that Rotem was the father. By 'certain' she means that none of the other guys she'd slept with would take her calls.

Rotem, whom Spears has been seeing of-and-on since splitting with Kevin Federline, has apparently confirmed to InTouch that the baby is his. "It's true," he says, surrounding his words with big fat quotation marks as he mimes fanning a stack of bills.

If you'll recall, Rotem is the prize specimen who sold Britney out by talking explicitly about their sex life to Blender Magazine earlier this year.

May I be the first to say, "Congratulations." I'm talking to their lawyers, not to them.

Zahara's Birth Mother Raped

HerBadMother — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:32:00 GMT

The good news coming out of the Angelina's-Adoption-Gone-Bad story this week: Zahara's birth mother does not want to remove Zahara from her adoptive family. Also good: Zahara's birth mother does not have AIDS. The not-so-good? Zahara was, apparently, conceived in rape.

Mentwabe Dawit, Zahara's birth mother, told Reuters that she was attacked one evening in 2004 after a day's work at a construction site in the southern Ethiopian town of Awasa.

As she walked home in the darkness, a man approached. "He pulled a dagger, put one hand on my mouth, so that I could not scream. He then raped me and disappeared." The 24-year-old decided to keep the assault a secret. "I feared the consequences of being raped in a community where rape is considered a taboo, even if what happened happened forcibly," she said.

Now, the fact that Zahara was conceived in rape does not in way bear upon her lovability and adorability and the extent to which she will be cherished throughout her life. Not one little bit. It's just a really, really sad detail, is all - one that underscores just how tremendously wonderful it is that such a child was given a chance at a happy life in a happy family, loved by happy parents. (If, that is, we believe that Angie and Brad are happy. Whatever the case, I think that they're both beyond happy to be Zahara's parents, and that's what matters.)

(Could the week in gossip get more depressing? Between rumored deaths and stories about suicide and depression, it's hardly shaping up to be a cheery Thanksgiving. Could someone maybe show their boobs or something? You know, make everyone feel better?)

Source: Perez; The Age

Will Angie And Brad Lose Zahara? Birth Family Wants Her Back

HerBadMother — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:49:00 GMT

Uh-oh. This could be seriously bad news for the Jolie-Pitt family: InTouch Weekly is set to report that Zahara Jolie-Pitt's birth family wants her back.

According to the InTouch story, first reported by Perez Hilton, little Zahara is not the AIDS orphan that she was reported to be. Apparently, her birth mother is alive and well and AIDS-free, and she has an extended family who desperately wants to see her. The family says that they were promised regular visits and contact with Zahara, but that they haven't seen her since her adoption and now want to fight for what's right - a relationship with their little girl.

A source close to Angelina says that she's heard about the family's concerns, but that she 'feels on a deeper level that Zahara is part of her family. “She believes that Zahara is an orphan and the woman who claims to be her mom is mistaken,” says a friend. Government papers said Zahara was an AIDS orphan, says the pal, and “Angie had no reason to believe otherwise. Zahara was days away from death and Angelina saved that child. As far as she is concerned, that bonded her to that little girl forever."'

Experts say that, regarding the issue of the birth family's right to visits with Zahara, 'Angelina has no obligation to keep in touch with Zahara’s blood family. “It’s up to the adoptive parents,” he says. “We cannot force them.”'

But could Zahara's birth mother sue for custody? Theoretically, yes.

According to the InTouch story, Zahara's birth mother 'never signed the papers giving up her daughter, which could give her a case for getting Zahara back — if she had the money to pursue it. “If some family member comes in and leaves the child at an orphanage and signs her over, and then the mother wants her back, you can make the argument that the person didn’t truly understand that their child is gone forever,” says adoption specialist Jerri Jenista.'

Obviously, Zahara's family doesn't have the money to pursue it, but even just speaking out yields some potentially bad press for Angelina and Brad. Not to mention, I imagine, a great deal of fear and anxiety.

Fingers crossed that this gets sorted out. For Zahara's sake.

(Source: PerezHilton, InTouch; Photo: PerezHilton)

FameCrawler : InTouch Weekly

Britney Was Raped/Was Britney Raped?

Tori Spelling: Bump And Boobs In A Tank Top. IN FEBRUARY.

Tori Spelling's Bump On Display: Guess *This* Pregnancy's Confirmed

Tori Spelling Pregnant Again

Tori Spelling's Bump On Display: Guess *This* Pregnancy's Confirmed

Tori Spelling Pregnant Again

Britney: Everybody Loves A Pregnant Klepto!

Britney Spears Text Messages Ryan Seacrest To Squash Baby Rumor But More Lies Surface

Somebody Stop Her: Britney Spears is Pregnant With J.R. Rotem's Baby

Zahara's Birth Mother Raped

Will Angie And Brad Lose Zahara? Birth Family Wants Her Back

Tori Spelling's Bump On Display: Guess This Pregnancy's Confirmed

Tori Spelling's Bump On Display: Guess This Pregnancy's Confirmed