Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Cori — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:08:00 GMT

this proves sarah palin is not a very good mother. obvioulsy the kids are not whom we think they are. They cover up. Way to go mother. now watch when her little ones become pregnant at 15!

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

sexymonica — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:37:45 GMT

who knows and who even cares if her daughter is "pregnant" or if it is sarah that is "pregnant"??

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

synt — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:21:11 GMT

nise sex famoily

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

P. Bentley — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:45:12 GMT

Yes, I believe she is a liar; but she is also a mother bear protecting her cubs. I am not going to vote for her anyway; so I do not care if the baby is hers or her daughter's.

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

P. Bentley — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:45:11 GMT

Yes, I believe she is a liar; but she is also a mother bear protecting her cubs. I am not going to vote for her anyway; so I do not care if the baby is hers or her daughter's.

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Imani — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:08:58 GMT

I read an article dated April 22nd,Sarah Palin claims the baby was born April 18, 2008, at Mat-Su Regional Hospital. I thought it odd that the Doctor who claimed to deliver the baby only referred to Sarah Palin, as "Palin". I decided to go to the Mat-Su Regional Hospital website. This Hospital has an "on line baby nursery". All births are listed publicly, along with the parents. There was no baby born to Sarah Palin, in April. In fact, there was no baby born the entire year to a "Palin" of any kind. No wonder they want to Press to stay off this subject. I went back and read the article, just to confirm that the Doctor never referred to Sarah Palin, as "Sarah". I believe, just in case this is found out, the Doctor can say, "Well I never said I delivered a baby to "Sarah", I said "Palin". Anyone doubting that this woman, is raising her daughter's child as her own, go to Mat-Su Regional Hospital to the "online nursery". You won't find any baby with the last name "Palin" or birth to a mother "Sarah Palin". This lady has alot of secrets. She may simply be embarrassed that her daughter turned around and became pregnant again, so suddenly. I also read an article that stated Bristol was out alot during the school year. I have had 3 children, and I can tell you that in this photo, it is very likely that Bristol was also Pregant December 2007. Young girls, can have a pregnant bump at 5 months. That's what it looks like to me.

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

bob — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:21:10 GMT

u stink sarah palin! we all no its ur BABY. GO AND FALL IN A FREAKIN DITCH!

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

PalinBabyQuestion — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:49:40 GMT

This is an important and serious question. Here's a website that's trying to collect all this information in one place:

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

shauna — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:44:11 GMT

McCain himself said was way too inexperienced to be President.

Pamela Anderson, “She can suck it”..

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Jennifer — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:56:26 GMT

Give the women a break, the odds of a teenager having a child with down syndrome is very unlikely.

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Hannah — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:00:15 GMT

If someone really looks at the facts, they will see that Sarah Palin's newest addition could not be the son of her oldest daughter. On September 1st, Palin announced that her daughter was 5 months pregnant. Trig was born in late April, meaning that if Bristol is 5 months pregnant now, she must have gotten pregnant in late April, early May. Do you honestly think that the governor would have kept the first pregnancy under wraps, yet she announces this pregnancy?

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

sarah.hoax — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:05:31 GMT

and if you think the Baby Bump photo above was taken in 2006, check out the family at inauguration, Nov 2006

govserv.state.ak.us/.../pict0210.jpg

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

sarah.hoax — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:03:50 GMT

Check this out. Newsweek interview, not once does Sarah mention her pregnancy, given "a few weeks before the birth", about 7.5 months pregnant, legs-crossed.

www.newsweek.com/.../156190

This pic is much better than the 6 mo. pic, AP Photo taken one week after Sarah announced she was 7 months.

www.daylife.com/.../0fcQ5EM7gafd9

notice arms, waist, belt.

Keep this story alive!

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

WhatIs GoingOnHere — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:45:14 GMT

I cannot believe that this story has disappeared from the media ... why is Sarah not being pressured to give us verifiable evidence on this?

-- Sarah does not look pregnant in any of the photos published with actual dates before her announcement at seven months

-- the Alaska newspaper reported at the time of the announcement that nobody, not even her own staff, believed that she was pregnant

-- Bristol disappeared from sight from the fifth month of the pregnancy until after the baby is born

-- Sarah has to scramble on a 10-hour flight to get back to Alaska, while in she is in labor? or to attend the birth of her grandchild?

-- Bristol's boyfriend's sister is at the hospital - why was she there? to be at the birth of her brother's child?

Why is all this important? One simple reason: if this has been a cover-up, Sarah needs to come forward and tell us the truth, and then let the voters decide based on ALL the facts. It may be that many voters will say, "I don't care that she has been lying about this for many months, I'm voting for her anyway." But many voters would also vote against her if this is a cover-up.

Either way, there are too many questions here. The Palin campaign's continuing refusal to provide actual, verifiable evidence (not simply the unverfied length of Bristol's current pregnancy) is just raising additional questions.

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

BloughMee — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:08:36 GMT

Here's the thing folks... WHY oh WHY hasn't this been investigated by the left-leaning media and exposed for what it is ? I have literally called or written 100 media outlets trying to get interest in the story - and there isn't any. It is SO FREAKING OBVIOUS to me that the reason Sarah Palin had to fly back to Alaska to have the baby... was because THAT IS WHERE THE BABY WAS....dangling from her nympho daughter's crotch. The only way she could have had it in Texas would have been to travel with her daughter to Texas.

SARAH PALIN IS A LYING, VINDICTIVE, SUB-PAR INTELLIGENCE FRAUD. She's a younger, female George Bush on so many levels. Stupid, gutterally sure of herself completely without cause, pentacostal extremist... Except... Bush is at least loyal to the people who helped him achieve power. On that score, Sarah Palin is a traitor by comparison. Somehow... thinking Republicans and Democrats alike have to take this ticket out of contention. The very fact that John McCain would select her, completely unvetted, on the basis of a 15 minute cell phone conversation is a complete insult to the American public and to the presidency. We spend far more time reviewing and interviewing Jr.level employees. It is an absolute travesty that this ticket is allowed to go forward. AMERIKA - WAKE THE F UP .

As John Lennon said... "A pretty face may last a year or two... but pretty soon they'll see what you can do... "

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

LindsayEmm — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:47:44 GMT

You've got to be kidding me!! Talk about grasping for straws. I feel so bad for this family having to deal with gossip and sleezy articles like this. Are you the same freaks that hijacked her email account? Seriously get a life. Bristol Palin is clearly several months pregnant. Being young and having her first baby, if her little brother were in fact her own baby, she so would have lost most of the weight by now. She is clearly pregnant, and that is clearly not old baby weight she is carrying. And as far as the pic of Sarah supposedly at 7 months, where is the proof of when that was taken? You gave no date, no article linking the date. And secondly, even if it is accurate, she is wearing a loose fitting suit and has her arms and hands in front of her belly area so how in the world can you even analyze it. You must have alot of sad lonely time on your hands!

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Come ON! — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:30:54 GMT

There is no way that Bristol Palin is Trig's mother. Just the fact that her stomach is a little heavy in this picture does not mean that she's pregnant! Girls carry weight there, as well as in their hips and thighs and butt; Bristol is just a little plump. You can tell from the general build of her body, and if you've seen any of the RNC stuff, Willow - at 13 - is not a slight girl either. It's just their genetic build.

That aside, there are several pictures online that clearly show that Sarah Palin was, in fact, pregnant with Trig. The one in her interview above clearly shows her from an almost dead-on angle, in a windbreaker that could easily disguise a baby bump. Likely, Palin would prefer for there to be few pictures of her pregnant and would be situated to photograh in the most flattering light to disguise her pregnancy. She wouldn't want to be thought of by the people of Alaska as a mother and woman, but rather as a competent governor; competence in politics leaves sex out of it.

There have been rumors that Sarah Palin posed for Vogue for the December 2007 issue and looked un-pregnant. Given, she probably posed for that several months before the magazine went to print, probably before she had even BECOME pregnant.

Finally, there's the fact that Trig has Down's Syndrome. Down's Syndrome is highly linked to increased age in the parents. Older men, especially, have a higher risk of having children with Down's Syndrome. So unless Bristol was fooling around with an older man, got pregnant, had her mother gain weight to playact at being pregnant, secretly gave birth to a child that her mother passed off as her own, and then, within a month, got pregnant again by a 17-year-old, it is impossible that Trig is anyone's son besides Sarah Palin.

Give it up. The Democrats are scared and Palin has tipped the scales for the Republicans. This sort of ridiculous smear campaign is frankly sick and stupid.

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

GreenEyeGirl — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:46:13 GMT

I am so glad to see there are others out there that are hip to this lie. Hey people make mistakes but the worst is to lie about them including a cover up that brings in the families of the poor boy who had sex with her. I wonder how his parents feel?

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Ray Ray — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:50:14 GMT

Maybe McCain is the babies daddy? You know they are Northerners. Okay lets be real, I think baby Trig is Bristols' because if you look at the way Todd hold him, he doesn't hold him as though he belongs to him.

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Kathie — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 04:58:24 GMT

We will see if Bristol "all of a sudden" loses this baby she supposedly is pregnant with. That will answer all the questions. I think Trig is Bristols child. Everytime you see her she is holding him. I saw the pictures of Bristol at the RNC and she looks more like she has baby fat and not pregnancy.

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

kiere — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:13:56 GMT

Just face it bristol is having a black baby and yall r gonna feel like idiots when the baby is born and its black

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Shira — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:46:09 GMT

Mommy Keitha,

Are you sure about Dylan? News says Bristol and Levi broke up lots of times, and ran around with others. So...could it be?

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Trish — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:23:17 GMT

Have you seen the latest Palin Paraphernalia??

http://www.trishwilliford.com/

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

Keitha Kolvig — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:37:21 GMT

I'm Dylan Kolvig's mom and I know he's not the father of Bristol's baby. You people are wacked.

re: Bristol Palin Pregnancy: Is Sarah Palin's Baby Really Her Daughter's? (Photos)

shira — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:56:18 GMT

How interesting! Tracey threatens death to whoever dares say that the emperor has no clothes.

My family died in battles so that we could speak up, and speak out. shame on you and your ilk for threatening me.