Nicole Kidman on Defying the Odds

re: Nicole Kidman on Defying the Odds

Sassy Smith — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:49:09 GMT

I agree Chochomom but there's another possiblity too - maybe Isabella and Connor have asked their parents NOT to talk about them - they're nearly 16 and 14, and you know teens, they probably want as much privacy as possible. And while they were growing up a few years ago, paparazzi weren't as nuts about celebrity kids as they are now (but it is true, the media goes nuts for the bio kids over the adopted kids...sad). However, having said that - it does bug me that Sunday Rose and Suri are "perfect" in their parents eyes but the adopted children are less than perfect? Both Nicole and Tom sort of give off that vibe. I have four kids and one of them is NOT my biological child - but if you met me or my kids, you'd not guess which one isn't blood related to me. They're all equally loved regardless of blood ties.

re: Nicole Kidman on Defying the Odds

Karl Erikson — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:52:52 GMT

Chochomom is right. You hardly hear about Bella and Connor because the paparazzi rarely cover them. Sad, but photos of the biological kids are more valuable.

re: Nicole Kidman on Defying the Odds

chochomom — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:02:09 GMT

In her defence, Tom has acted the same regarding Bella and Conner too. And have you noticed how Shilo is dressed in angelic whites and beatiful clothes while Zhara only six months only is in more grungy garb?

The press is partly to blame too, the prices for the bio kids is much higher than for the adopted ones.

re: Nicole Kidman on Defying the Odds

ugh — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:12:45 GMT

I guess those adopted kids don't count as much as the biological child. I find this woman increasingly repugnant. She has two other children but she seems completely oblivious to that. She's been a mother, allegedly, for years, but suddenly it's all new??