<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.babble.com/CS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Maggie Gyllenhaal Nurses in Public. Again.</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2007/06/06/maggie-gyllenhaal-nurses-in-public-again.aspx</link><description>With the way Maggie Gyllenhaal whips her breasts out all over town , you'd think doing it on purpose just to piss people off. I mean, could her baby, Ramona, possibly need to eat that much? And in public, no less? In front of a bunch of paparazzi? You</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator><item><title>To Hell With The 'Sexy' Lists: Who's A *Good* Celebrity Mom?</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2007/06/06/maggie-gyllenhaal-nurses-in-public-again.aspx#52256</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:20:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:52256</guid><dc:creator>FameCrawler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have an idea for a new list. It will be an antidote to all of the superficial and misogynistic lists that currently get all of the press, and it will make everyone feel better. Cookie Magazine or whomever could publish it, and we could all debate who&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=52256" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Maggie Gyllenhaal Models Goth Underwear</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2007/06/06/maggie-gyllenhaal-nurses-in-public-again.aspx#39394</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 19:40:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:39394</guid><dc:creator>FameCrawler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally, Anne Rice* Underoos! Now available at Hot Topic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=39394" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rebecca Gayheart Shows Boobies, Confounds Ethicists</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2007/06/06/maggie-gyllenhaal-nurses-in-public-again.aspx#30103</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:56:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:30103</guid><dc:creator>FameCrawler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This just in: children should not be exposed to boobies. Boobies are dirty. Boobies are bad. Boobies corrupt the young and inflame the wicked. Boobies should be kept tucked away under shirts or, at least, teeny weeny bikini tops. But - just in case you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30103" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Maggie Gyllenhaal Takes A Walk, Totally Hot Brother Jake is Nowhere in Sight</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2007/06/06/maggie-gyllenhaal-nurses-in-public-again.aspx#27969</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:11:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:27969</guid><dc:creator>FameCrawler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's Maggie Gyllenhaal in Manhattan, taking a stroll with 7-month old daughter Ramona and taking precautions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=27969" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>