http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2008/05/08/nicole-kidman-dumped.aspxI kinda figured that this particular relationship would last. I mean, I know that a pregnancy very often spells the end of these things - pregnancies being hard to accomodate in some such situations - but it just hadn&#39;t occurred to me that this pregnancyenCommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2008/05/08/nicole-kidman-dumped.aspx#91742Thu, 08 May 2008 20:23:31 GMT42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:91742Gloria (another one)<p>I read before this happened that her contract with Chanel would be up in 2008 anyhow!! I think the media chose to say dumped because it's pick on Nicole Kidman for some reason! She has a lot of class IMO! She is just a charismatic icon, like it or not!!</p> <img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=91742" width="1" height="1">http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2008/05/08/nicole-kidman-dumped.aspx#91694Thu, 08 May 2008 18:01:32 GMT42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:91694Gloria<p>Maybe because of all of Kidman's talk about being &quot;all natural&quot; when it was clearly written all over her face that she was laying threw her over plumped up lips. &nbsp;Other than an over-priced commercial and a photo, what else did she do them?</p> <img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=91694" width="1" height="1">http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2008/05/08/nicole-kidman-dumped.aspx#91687Thu, 08 May 2008 17:47:41 GMT42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:91687Dani<p>I understand she drove their sales up over 40 percent over what they were before she became their &quot;face&quot; - so why change.</p> <img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=91687" width="1" height="1">