Home/Work

Working Mother's Guilt: the Back-to-School Edition

As I've mentioned in other blog posts, I grew up with a working mother. She was a journalist, with a very demanding series of progressively more responsible, high pressure jobs, and she also had a lengthy commute. Her mother was also a working journalist, so she knew the drill. While there were a lot more employed mothers when I was growing up than there were when my mother was growing up (when she was a kid, her mother was pretty much the only mom-with-a-job she knew), I was still unique among my friends in the demands of my mother's job. I know that there were lots of American moms in the 70s and 80s who were grappling with the mother-employee balance in the way my mother did, but none of them seemed to have children who attended my school, church or 4-H Club meetings.

 

In my juvenile milieu, my mother's work made her an anomaly. None of the kids I knew personally had mothers with the kind of high-octane, super competitive, no-summers-off, always-on-call career like my own mom's, where breaking news sometimes meant a 15 hour day, or where "election night" was actually "election week," and where we might not see her for 48 hours straight. If an interview she had been trying to land for months suddenly became available at 9pm on Sunday night, she went out to do the interview at 9pm on a Sunday night. (My father was also a working journalist, and between my 7th and 10th grade years of high school, he attended law school at night, after work, eventually graduating with honors. So both of my parents worked at a supercharged pace throughout much of my childhood.)

 

And as far as flexibility on the job for my mom, the working mother of three? Forget about it. In the 70s and 80s, there was no way a woman who wanted to keep her job in journalism, much less be taken seriously and move up the ranks could suggest to her male boss that she might, say, work from home two afternoons a week, or negotiate a special schedule in the summer months when her kids were out of school. If one of us became sick (something our family discouraged to a degree I never truly understood until I became a working mom, and experienced for myself the moment of panic that comes when you realize your 6 year old has a fever of 102 degrees at 7:30 am on a Tuesday morning, and that you have a cannot-be-missed meeting scheduled with a client at 9:00am), there was no way at that time that she could have asked to use her own sick leave to take one of us to the doctor. It simply Wasn't Done.

 

 As a child and teenager, it wasn't hard for me to see that many of the other 4-H, Brownie, Little League, and PTA moms simply didn't grasp the concept of a mother with a job like  the one my mother had. Some of these other moms worked, but they worked part time, or in jobs that allowed them to be free in the summer, and after their kids came home from school each afternoon. Their jobs were not highly competitive or male-dominated like my mom's was, and their husband's jobs were obviously primary in the family priority structure. While my mother never, ever judged these women for choosing (or being able to choose) a different path, I know she could see what I saw, which was that a lot of the other moms at my school and around town actually felt sorry for my siblings and me, what with our absentee, women's libber, "career woman" mother. While I might have been a-okay with the fact that my mom wasn't at school for the 4th grade Christmas presentation - which fell at 11 am on a weekday - I very clearly remember how other moms would pointedly ask me where she was, even though they knew perfectly well that she was at work. They wanted to make a point by asking,  and then they would "tsk tsk" in a way that made their disapproval obvious to me. (For the record, they never asked why my father wasn't there.)

 

Basically, these women - who were nice folks in general (and also good mothers, just like my mom) - literally could not imagine the demands of a job like my mother's. A mother of young children with a job like that was as foreign to most of them as if she had an extra eyeball in the middle of her forehead.  Because of this, I always got the sense that they believed she was either exaggerating the demands in an effort to avoid being named "first grade room mom,"  or that she was simply a failure at time management, money management, husband management (because they all had husbands whose jobs mostly paid the bills)...or all of the above. I could see how guilty this made her feel, even though her income was absolutely crucial to our family, and even though she was damn good at what she did, and loved it. And of course, the value to her children of seeing their muckraking mother bust a slumlord for ripping off poor families, or snag an interview with Ken Kesey, or be named bureau chief for a major wire service had a value just as meaningful and long-lasting as baking cookies for the school's Fall Festival. But if I sometimes felt the sting of other mothers judging her harshly because she never chaired the school fundraising committee or taught Sunday School, I know she must have suffered far more painfully from their disapproval. 

 

 I guess I figured that by the time I had kids of my own, things would be different. I was lucky enough to have a rather enviable work-at-home career for the first 7-8 years I was a parent, and it allowed me to have the best of both worlds. But the only reason this was do-able was because I was in a marriage at that time where my husband's "primary" job provided a dependable paycheck, health insurance and other benefits. We both worked, but my "job" was the one where no boss  - because, as a freelance writer and editor, I was mostly my own boss - was going to raise a fuss if I needed to spend an entire week doing nothing but caring for three young children with the flu. My ability to do this also meant that their father didn't have to endanger his own job by missing work. It was an arrangement that worked well for all concerned.

 

But after my marriage ended, and necessity moved me into the full-time, "real world" workforce, I discovered something rather disappointing. While employers' understanding of working motherhood has improved tremendously since my own childhood - meaning that my bosses have been very understanding of my need to sometimes take my own sick days for sick children, or of my very occasional requests to work temporarily modified schedules  - I still sense a certain kind of disapproval from an awful lot of other moms.

 

 If the bane of a working mother's summertime existence is cobbling together childcare, the flip side of that guilt and stress coin comes when school starts back up in August, beginning with the very first day of classes, which are usually a half-day. I can't easily just take half the day off of work, so year after year, I've had to get someone else - like my sister or my paid babysitter - to pick the children up at 11:45 am on the first day of school. And what kind of rotten mother doesn't even have the time to pick her own kids up on the very first day of school? Well...me. I am that kind of rotten mother, because like my own mom, I also have a very demanding job. And 30 years after I remember being made to feel bad as a child because my rotten mother didn't show up for the elementary school cookie bake-off - because she was at work - I find that I am judged in much the same way as my own mother was by those moms who CAN do the 11:45 am, first-day-of-school minivan run.

 

One would think that by now, the idea of mothers with competitive, time-intensive careers would be old-hat. To watch TV, or movies, or read modern fiction, one would certainly come to the conclusion that even the most career-driven and ambitious mother is an everyday thing in our culture. But that's not been my personal experience. I find that a not insignificant percentage of the other moms I meet still don't seem to grasp the concept of one of their own having the kind of job that actually requires 40-plus, demanding hours a week. There seems to still be a widespread assumption that "mom jobs" are always kinda, sorta part-time - even if they are "full time" on paper -  and that they are generally structured around school hours and calendars (Surely you can make the 10am weekday school fundraiser planning meeting! You're a mom!).

 

But that's not the way it is for a lot of us working mamas. Our jobs are not full-time in concept only; they really are full time, for real, just like men's jobs. Only we're moms! Just imagine!

 

No matter how accomodating and family-friendly my employer is (and she is), the fact remains that I work a lot of hours in an industry that simply isn't conducive to regularly popping out of the office for an extra few hours here and there to chaperone a school field trip, or to consistently make it to soccer practices that start at 3:45 pm on weekdays. I remarried a wonderful fella in 2006 (lucky me!), and for several good reasons - and by agreement - my job is actually the primary one in our family, rather than his. Additionally, I am working in an economy where jobs are hard to come by, and where all of us who are lucky enough to have them are hustling doubletime to develop new business.This is not a "part time, soccer mom" kind of economy for those of us who are our family's primary wage earners. I haven't always worked at this level of intensity, and I certainly won't always need to work at this level of intensity, but for now, I am at a place where I have to kick it up a notch. That's what I have to do, and frankly - when I'm not feeling guilty, or worried that a neverending meeting is making me late picking one of my kids up from a playdate - I am loving the challenges and pace of my work these days. But apparently, my situation rubs some other mothers the wrong way. What I see as a strong work ethic, and a desire to build a better, more secure and independent financial future for my family and myself, they see as selfishness and a yuppified form of child neglect.

 

Let me be clear that I am not suggesting that every mom I know or meet who works part time, or who doesn't work for pay cops a judgmental attitude about my status as an employed parent. I feel blessed to have many stay-at-home mom friends who are tremendously dear to me, and with whom I share the ability to connect as mothers beyond our different lifestyles. We support each other and laugh with each other and commiserate together over the hard parts of our lives, whether those are work or family-related. I am forever indebted to a few of my stay-at-home mother-friends (particularly my sister) who always have my back when I do need help with afterschool pick-up. They never judge, they just step in to help. And I love them for it, and know how lucky I am to have them in my life, and my kids' lives.

 

Additionally, I  am sure that some of my perception of judgment stems entirely from my own internal guilt and conflict about whether I am failing my children, my husband, my employer or myself by attempting to do too much. And no one can make you feel guilty like you make yourself feel guilty, especially when honesty compels you to admit that there are certainly times when my kids really do wish I were more available for things like field trips and bake sales. I know they do, and thus arises my self-inflicted flagellation. But I am equally sure that a fair portion of my sense of being judged is indeed coming from the Good Moms, the ones who, unlike me, managed to marry (and stay married the first time!) to someone with a good-paying job, with health insurance, thus allowing these Good Moms to work part time, or not at all. These Good Moms manage to communicate their distaste for my situation with a certain look, a certain tone...and sometimes, by pointedly excluding me from the non-work-hours, mom-centric activities and social events that I likely COULD attend, if I were asked. And I know for a fact that a few of them sometimes ask my poor, neglected children why their mother is not in attendance at a particular event or activity, even though they know very well that I am at work. 

 

Sometimes, when I get "that look" from another mother, after I've sheepishly explained why I can't come to the coaches' appreciation luncheon, much less help organize the flower arrangements, I want to blurt out an explanation of my financial reality to her. I want to tell her about how I got divorced when I was 34 years old, and then had to start all over, from scratch, just like a 21 year old college graduate at the very start of her career, except with shared custody of three kids, no savings, no health benefits, and with bills to pay. I want to tell her how intense the world of billable agency hours can be, and how competitive. I want to ask her if she ever lays in bed at night, silently going over her office to-do list for the next day, and hoping she can somehow get to work an hour early, just to get caught up. Sometimes, I feel like defiantly declaring that I actually LIKE my job, and that I am, by nature, a competitive person who is a better mother at home when I am challenged at work. 

 

 But I don't ever say anything. I just silently feel guilty, wondering whether she's so obviously disdainful of  me because she feels like she's having to pull more than her fair share of the classroom cookie-baking weight for all of us slacker, non-cookie-baking, working moms, or because she truly believes I don't care enough about my own children to have made the "right" choices, like she did. Maybe it's some of both. But while I may not be sure exactly why she's judging me, I know that she is. Just like my own working mom was judged,  30 years ago.

 

FOLLOW KATIE'S BLOGGING ON TWITTER OR FACEBOOK

READ MORE OF KATIE'S BABBLE BLOGGING

VISIT KATIE'S PERSONAL BLOG

 



+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US

Comments

 

Your mama said:

I really do feel your pain and conflict. I wish I could have stayed at home, been an active PTA mom and been there when you got home from school (especially after I learned you had taken your pony upstairs). But, I simply couldn't do that. It wasn't for a flat screen tv or a luxury car that I didn't. It was for food and clothing and shelter. And, yes, I mostly loved what I did, but I loved you and your brother and sister more. No one except working mothers understand. I imagine that my mother, who had an incredibly exciting and remarkable career, has the same thoughts at age 90.

August 17, 2009 11:51 PM
 

your mama said:

Katie - I feel your pain, really, and that of other working mothers. Although my career was important to me, it was not as important as you, your sister and brother, yet I know there were many times the three of you no doubt thought it meant more. It didn't. It meant income for food, shelter, education and clothing. Would I have preferred to be active in the PTA, attend all of your school functions, home to bake cookies? Yes. But, it wasn't an option. I'm sure that my mother, who had a truly remarkable professional life, would say the same. But, all of you are incredible adults and parents, so it had a good ending. Do I wish that all mothers could stay at home with their children and then have fabulous careers? You bet. Is that real life? No.

August 18, 2009 12:06 AM
 

Stella said:

Katie, it sucks that people are judging you based on their assumptions about you and your life. You're right -- you'd think that sort of attitude would be gone by now! I honestly think children are happiest when their parents live fulfilled, meaningful lives. It looks like you're able to find fulfillment in both working and being a mom. Nothing wrong with that.

Besides, you'd think that ANYONE would understand the idea of having to work a little more in this economy. Keep on keeping on, Katie!

August 18, 2009 12:36 AM
 

Nicola O. said:

I think part of the problem here is that the women who DO understand you are hard to find, because we are also busy with clients and deadlines and contractors and projects, while juggling carpools and looking for rides for the kids and a pediatrician with Saturday hours.

A partner for sure makes it easier.  You know what else makes it easier?  Skip the guilt.  Really.  If you think you're not spending enough time with your kids, that's one thing.  But that's not the same as not spending enough time with the PTA.  My thoughts on it are kind of old-school and probably politically incorrect, but you know what?  School is the important thing.  PTAs and the things they do are a wonderful, enriching, <i>extra</i>.  EXTRA.  Not essential.  Not fundamental.  Not in the way that what you provide for your children through your job is fundamental and essential.

Your contribution comes out of the income tax you pay as a career professional, and the role model you provide.  Anything else is gravy (which BTW,  is why they call it <i>volunteer</i> work).  And if you do decide to take an afternoon off and help at one of the school events?  Screw the cookie bake-off.  Hit career day, and show 'em how it's done.

August 18, 2009 1:23 AM
 

Liz said:

Would it be fair if I were to say that I have judged some DADS because it seemed to me that their career was way more important than their families??? It may be because I live in a relatively cheap part of the country that I can even say this. That is part of why I live here.

I think parents need to work together as a team to make sure their kids needs are met and that they have time for each other and for their careers. In generations past I am not sure that people saw working as "fulfillment" so much as a necessary part of life. Probably the shift from back breaking grunt work marked the beginning of women wanting to join the work force. I don't think many women wanted to trade housework for fieldwork in an agrarian society. You simply did what had to be done.

There is a lot of interim between all career and revolving your life completely around your kids.

I have heard of dads who travel so much they are never available for their kids important events. And that is sad too. I wonder if they may have their priorities wrong and are trading their families welfare for the "dream job".

Really this should not be a women's issue. It should be a matter of all parents prioritizing their kids emotional needs. Not just moms, but dads too. And it doesn't mean women not working. Probably different solutions hold out for every family.

Some of the workplace hostility is not towards MOTHERS but towards PARENTS. I'm sure you've seen some of the stuff the child free people have to say about how they hate to pick up the slack for parents and how unfair it all is and etc etc etc. and they should get extra vacation days to compensate for the people with kids who get to take off to have babies. Oy vey.

August 18, 2009 3:22 AM
 

Heather said:

Keep on keepin' on Katie!!!  You have every right to be proud of your accomplishments both in your career and as a mother.  I'm a "career woman" who works in the world of billable hours (law)-- you are preaching to the choir.  I know from your blog that you are NOT a helicopter parent and that your kids are extraordinarily lucky to have such a great father, aunt and extended support network.  You are setting a wonderful example for your daughters and your sons.

August 18, 2009 9:27 AM
 

Melissa said:

No one ever judges a dad for working.  Both of my parents worked and contributed equally to my family.  I was lucky to have a grandmother living with us to babysit, but neither of their jobs weren't that demanding and they were home every night.  

I never even considered not working.  I do wish maternity leave were longer, because nursing and working is very hard.  But even if I were independently wealthy, I would work by the time my kid was a toddler.  I enjoy going to work every day. I have no judgment for those mothers who choose not to work, as long as they leave me alone.

August 18, 2009 9:39 AM
 

Tina said:

Perhaps some would say this is just another example of "the haves" carrying the weight of the "have nots." However,the parents that are always contributing their time to volunteer shouldn't assume that you have no desire to be doing what they have the option to do. Working mama's usually don't have a choice to get involved during the day. Are there any evening's that you could contribute an hour or so to alleviate some of the guilt and feel more connected? I know there are many opportunities for evening volunteering in my sons school.

August 18, 2009 10:22 AM
 

Colette said:

You tell 'em Katie!  I feel your pain.

August 18, 2009 10:28 AM
 

Catherine said:

@Nicola A hit the nail on the head, Katie.

"Your contribution comes out of the income tax you pay as a career professional, and the role model you provide.  Anything else is gravy (which BTW,  is why they call it <i>volunteer</i> work).  And if you do decide to take an afternoon off and help at one of the school events?  Screw the cookie bake-off.  Hit career day, and show 'em how it's done"

August 18, 2009 11:16 AM
 

mamatried said:

When I taught high school it seemed that there were only a handful of stay at home moms who pretty much carried the load for organizing/fundraising/volunteering at the school.  Most women seemed to be back at work full time by this age and/or just done with these types of activities and it was these few women that basically supported much of the extracurricular activities to which many, many children benefited and these women get very little in terms of appreciation for their efforts.  

I think in parenting there will always be those 'polly annas' that make us normal moms (working or not) feel kind of bad/guilty for not being up to par.

August 18, 2009 12:51 PM
 

Cecilia said:

I'm surprised by this blog because in my area the majority of mothers I know not only work full time, but in challenging, 50+ hour a week industries like law, finance, and media. Perhaps there is a regional difference? I'm in NYC and the only stay at home moms I know are married to very wealthy men. (I suppose this has to do with the cost of real estate) Anyway, just wanted to chime in that although the judgment you're experiencing sounds awful, at least things are advancing for the better in other parts of the country.

August 18, 2009 12:52 PM
 

Courtney said:

I live in the Boston metro area, and I know very few SAHMs as well.  Actually, I often feel judged because I am a SAHM right now, like somehow I took the easy/lazy route and now I get to just play and have fun all day.  I have tremendous respect for moms who work, and there are actually a lot of days when I think that being a working mom might be a lot better for my sanity.  Unfortunately, given the cost of child care in our area (and the fact that I'm about 2 weeks away from giving birth to #2), it just doesn't make sense for me to go back to work now.  Anyway, while I'm sure there are moms out there judging you, there are also plenty of SAHMs who totally get what you're going through, and who think you're doing an amazing job.  Keep up the good work, both in the office and at home!  

August 18, 2009 1:54 PM
 

kgranju said:

@Cecilia - I definitely think that different geographic areas, and different cultural subsets of American moms have different balances of SAHM/working moms, and of working moms who are employed in ultra intense jobs. - Katie

August 18, 2009 2:23 PM
 

coolteamblt said:

My son is an infant, and I work an unorthodox schedule that changes every few months. My husband and I both have to work to keep our family afloat. I get told that I should work part time to see my son more, but my husband never gets that. His married sister works part time, and always seems to pity me. He has another sister that's single and works full time who never seems to get the same pity about daycare or limited time with her daughter. It's so odd to me.

August 18, 2009 2:27 PM
 

Roper said:

I can related to so much of what you write about in this post. The guilt for me is compounded by the fact that I think even if I *could* afford to stay home full-time and not work for pay, I wouldn't want to. I'd go absolutely insane. (What kind of mother does that make me?)

I also continue to find it very odd that so many school events and school-age activities are planned with the assumption that a parent can be present in the middle of the work day.

August 18, 2009 3:18 PM
 

LouAnn said:

I find it appalling that the schools are so dependent on the efforts of volunteers to do all this stuff. Then I wonder how much of it is really necessary? Who decrees that cookies have to be baked to take to school? Why is there a 'coaches appreciation luncheon?' Why can't student teachers chaperone on the field trips? (Good experience for them.) A lot of this sounds like the schools are still operating under the assumption that there's a cadre of workers out there who are at home all day. Society has changed!

If all the stay at home moms quit doing all this stuff, I think we would find that we could quite easily do without a lot of it, and that the fundraising stuff would come out of the state or local budget, as it should. Parents have enough to do without carrying the load at school. This is in no way aimed at teachers, whom I know are already working as hard as they can.

My dh was a middle-school teacher and he thought the idea that the kids had to sell candy and the parents were expected to make stuff for bake sales was insane. He never held a concert or recital during the school day, only in the evenings.

August 18, 2009 6:37 PM
 

patricia said:

@Roper: I don't have a choice to stay home financially now, since my husband has been laid off, but before that, I did have a financial choice, and I went back to work because I *wanted* to.  My older girl is 3 now, and I've really made my peace with the fact that I like to work, I love my job, and I'm not suited to staying at home.  I like being competitive and climbing the ladder at my job.  It's an important part of me, and I spent a lot of time and money (education loans) to achieve what I have professionally.

And yet, I still have the guilt.  I *know* that I am a better, more PRESENT parent when I work.  I *know* that I would be so much less fulfilled and happy if I stayed at home with the girls, and I am positive that a happy mom is a better mom.  And I really want to be the professional role model for my female children that I didn't have growing up.  But I still feel guilty.  Every time I read a working mom vs. SAHM discussion on the internet, the refrain, "Why did you even have kids if you don't plan to raise them yourself?" has always seemed like the cruelest thing one mom could say to another, and yet it is something that gives me pause every time.  So I am right there with you in questioning myself.  What kind of mother does it make me that I want to work?

My kids aren't in school yet.  I am sure this dichotomy will be kicked up a bit when they are.

August 18, 2009 10:59 PM
 

mamatried said:

But let's be honest.  People that have really demanding careers are probably not going to be at the coach appreciation dinner whether you plan it at 10:30 am or 6:30 pm (and the coach probably doesn't want to give up yet another evening to attend one since he/she also has a family).  And, it IS a nice gesture since coaches (except for football where I live) give up a lot of their free time for very little extra pay.  Schools are underfunded around here so if fundraising is not going on then there really won't be trips for the band or state competitions because there are always kids on the team whose parents cannot afford to contribute.

But that is here nor there.  I am not in a career that is particularly exciting or competitive so it is hard for me to relate to women (and men) who are.  I have always thought of work as an ends to a means which is probably why I am in the career path I'm in.  I don't think it is a female thing either as my husband is the exact same way.  We both want our jobs to give us lots of time off so we can now spend time with the girls but in the past give us time to go to Mexico for three weeks and do nothing.  My husband has a friend who just got a job actually doing what they do but at the beach.  The guy has only been twice actually to the beach since taking the job in June and my husband's take is that this friend is just wired to be a worker and cannot relax so it doesn't matter where he does it and the beach is wasted on him!  I guess what I'm trying to say is it seems for a lot of people a job is just a job not really an exciting career so in this respect Kate I think you are very unique!!

August 19, 2009 8:48 AM
 

Yvonne said:

I stayed home with my second child for 3 months, and I was so ready to go back to work. It helps that my mom & my MIL watch my kids so I have no worries about them during the day. I know that I would not like to be a SAHM, and I am totally OK with that. So is my husband. I work because it makes me feel like I am contributing to our family, and because we need the money to cover all our expenses. I feel the judgement too, and it is frustrating. We know we are making the right choices for our family, and our kids know how much we love them. It is hard to suffer the judgemnts and looks, but we try to let it roll off our backs. The kids are happy, we are happy, and all is good.

August 19, 2009 9:15 AM
 

kgranju said:

@mamatried: I do like my job, but in a perfect world, I would not work this many hours, or have this kind of job stress overall, or feel like my family's entire financial well-being falls on my shoulders. I would very much like to have more time with the fam (which I will, just not right this exact moment). But ending up essentially penniless, property-less, and starting from absolute ground zero (but with children to care for) at age 34 left me about 10 years behind everyone I know in terms of owning a house, having any retirement funds, etc, etc, etc. The circumstances of my divorce and its immediate aftermath essentially ate up every penny of the modest property and savings that I had accrued as a partner in my 12 year marriage. And thus, I scramble and try to catch up. And like Scarlett O'Hara, I never, ever, ever want to "go hungry" again. That was a terrifying, humbling, ass-kicking experience, and it motivates me in a way people who haven't been through it might not understand. If I hadn't had family assistance during the divorce and transition period, I don't know what I would have done.

I also never want to depend one iota on any other person financially in such a way that should that person drop dead or otherwise disappear from my life, I would be in a mess (again). No one ever thinks they will end up divorced or widowed, but they do. And I see so many women who would be in the same situation I was in should their marriages end for any reason.

Also, while the jobs you and your guy have may not be super high pressure or super highly compensated, they DO offer fantastic health, retirement and other benefits (relative to the private sector) that make a huge difference. My retirement situation is Not Good at this point. I have to get that all figured out.

-Katie

August 19, 2009 9:41 AM
 

Leslie said:

As an SAHM doing a lot of the volunteering being discussed in this post and the comments, I can report that I have never felt resentful of parents who are working.  What I feel resentful of is the school which expects the same level--or really, I think, a greater level--of participation/volunteering as back in the day when all the mothers were available instead of just a few of us.  Some of us also feel a certain resentment toward the SAHMs who spend ALL their time at the school volunteering and seem surprised that other SAHMs might have other demands on our time.

Maybe it's different in the public schools, but our school could not function without the volunteers.  Money earned via fundraisers which are totally volunteer-run is built into the budget each year.  Functions run by volunteers are central to the school's development efforts.  I spent many, many hours last year fundraising and planning for the 8th grade trip and the 8th grade graduation celebration.  As more and more mothers work, the demands on those of us at home do not go away.  I do think some of the "cookie baking" comments above are a bit snarky.  The kids of working mothers benefit equally from the efforts of volunteers.

Talking of judging, I question the assumption that all mothers who stay home are "able" to do so because they are well off.  For my family, my being at home is a priority for all kinds of reasons, but this means a very reduced standard of living for us.  I often feel judged (and quite possibly a lot of the judgments all of us think others are making arise from our own insecurities about our choices, yes?)by mothers who work who I suspect think I am not doing my part by staying home when I could be making a much-needed contribution to our income.

August 19, 2009 9:58 AM
 

Dewi said:

In my area Katie working life as a mother is not unique; all working mothers have demanding careers or a serious professional life as a working artist,writer, or actor.

Like @Cecilia, I also live in NYC and it’s true Katie life is the norm so, in our local schools we only had meetings and functions at 7:00 or 8:00 pm including all of the kids recitals and events.  

So there is a way for a community to be realistic and  accommodating to working families.

Maybe it’s time to speak up and ask the school to accommodate you, instead of you a having to accommodate the women who stay at home!

August 19, 2009 10:46 AM
 

Dewi said:

Sadly people with "jobs" never really understand people who are passionate about their careers.

They underestimate the level of personal satisfaction we receive from the work we do, and the deep commitment we feel to our working life.

It goes so beyond just making a living, they cannot understand or relate since that passion does not need to exist when someone just has a "job" they show up for each day.

August 19, 2009 10:55 AM
 

Margaret said:

I feel your pain. My kids attend a Christian, private school in the Deep South and there is a total cultural expectation that you stay at home with your (preferably numerous) children.  I sometimes feel like I'm the only mom there with a job.  I think I would feel differently if my kids were enrolled in Public School.  But... having grown up with a mom that worked (just 40 hrs./week, nothing like your mom) I got a lot of value out of that.  My kids are far mor independent than their peers and that's a good thing.  

August 19, 2009 11:09 AM
 

Joanie said:

Just for a second, think in this direction instead: Will your daughter, when she's 21 and graduating from college, be prouder of you for following your career dreams?  Or for making those cookies for home room?

You are setting an example for your children of the priorities in your life and the strength it takes to live them.  Screw the PTA ladies.  And teach yourself to turn off the guilt.

August 19, 2009 2:29 PM
 

mamatried said:

I hear ya Kate!  The one thing that is very comforting to me is that if anything happened to my spouse I could easily go back to my regular full time job and continue to work my current part time job and make the same amount of money we make as a couple right now.  This actually brings me a lot of comfort.  Our benefits are good but the retirement is pretty much a joke.  We should worry about that but I am being Scarlet O'Hara at the moment (I plan to kick ass on saving for retirement in my 50s).  

I do have the utmost admiration for your drive is what I was trying to say.  I just don't have the drive.  

August 19, 2009 3:10 PM
 

dewi said:

Working mothers be glad you're busy working, read what some stay-at-home moms are busy doing, nationally there is a movement to get rid of ice cream trucks!

OMG! it's insane.

What happened to parents saying NO.

www.nytimes.com/.../19soft.html

August 19, 2009 6:05 PM
 

Leslie said:

Dewi, I agree banning the ice cream man is insane but the insanity is not limited to SAHMs with too much time on their hands (is there such a thing?).  There were three moms whose professions were listed, and two of them worked outside the home.

August 19, 2009 6:20 PM
 

dewi said:

Leslie,

Banning ice cream truck is a symptom of a greater parenting problem and attitude, I was wrong to only blame SAHM, everyone is nuts these days!

Children whine for ice cream, so what.

I have a very influential mover and shaker type of women in my apt building who wanted the Mr Softee music stopped.

SHe went around with a petition she hates me, i did not sign it, I told her i like the music, how else would i know when the ice cream truck is here *-)>

Her efforts got our mayor of NYC to stop Mr Softee from playing the music once the truck parks.

So now we always miss the ice cream man :(

August 20, 2009 12:58 PM
 

Sarah said:

People are going to judge you no matter what you do.  Mothers, in particular, seemed to be contstantly judged.  You stay home, you work full time, you let your kid watch too much t.v, you let them eat crap.  It can go on and on.

There will always be those people out there who love to judge.  I like to believe,however, that most people are too wrapped up in their own lives to care that much.  The mother who shoots you a look when you say you can't volunteer at ten a.m?  She might actually be thinking, "I can't get anyone to help, now I've got to do it all." instead of "She should really be working less."  And not everyone is going to be aware of what your job requires.  My husband is the primary bread winner in our family and he has no problem leaving work in the middle of the day for various school functions.  His job is just very flexible.  I actually know a fair amount of "primary" bread winners whose jobs are like this.  Try to assume positive intent and remember that you just can't please everybody.

August 20, 2009 2:41 PM
 

Erin said:

I think that whatever choice a mother makes, and for whatever reason, she is likely to question herself.  I think a lot of the mommy wars over this issue stem from that.  Perhaps some of the people who are (or may be) judging you are actually jealous of you? Maybe they enjoy being SAHMs but also feel envious of all you have accomplished in your career and writing?

August 21, 2009 1:29 AM
 

Katie (also) said:

As the primary bread winner in my family too, I have to agree with Erin.  I see some of the SAHM hostility coming from dreams they themselves never realized.  The grass is always greener...  While I certainly regret not having more weekday hours with my shortie, I make the time we do have rock.

Somehow the fact that we still do so many great things together and have such a close relationship even with a 50+ hour work week irks them all the more.  I honestly just don't get it and have finally grown a thicker skin to it all.  Life is short, sorry they waste their precious moments fretting over   ... Me?? Perhaps I should be flattered...

You go girl :)

August 24, 2009 1:09 AM
 

Laurie said:

I've done it all, SAHM, WOHM, WAHM. It's always hard and there are always challenges. I feel guilty that I have no real interest in being the super-volunteer type of parent, and I've felt guilt for about a million other little parenting related things too. But mostly I'm grateful that I have the opportunities I have in my life-my husband is far more limited than I as the main income for our family. I really wish more of us could stop putting our expectations on one another as parents though - we just can't (and have no right) know each other's situation enough to understand why we all make our different choices and we need to trust that most of us want to be good parents and good people, even if we take different paths.

August 26, 2009 10:35 AM
 

BW said:

Very good piece and great insights on the struggle of work/life balance for working mothers.  This was very thought-provoking, particularly for someone who has seen the idea of the "mom job" taken to the extreme, and jobs that are "full-time" on paper and in responsibility be allowed to become structured around school hours and calendars to the detriment of others in the organization.

Obviously, this would fall under the heading of "inappropriately managed organizations" and should not reflect negatively on working mothers at large, but the increase/necessity of dual-income households has certainly created a challenge for all parties involved.  Sometimes those who are childless are presumed to have "nothing better to do", so their time is considered less valuable than coworkers who are parents and they're left to "clean up the mess".  It's definitely a challenge from all angles.

Again, great piece.

August 26, 2009 1:54 PM

in

About the Blogger

Katie Allison Granju

A working mom embraces life with four busy kids and a continually buzzing Blackberry.

Katie Allison Granju lives in a 100-year-old house with her husband and her four children, who range in age from one to seventeen. She's a book author, a freelance writer and Director of Social Media at a public relations firm. She doesn't know how she does it either.

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage