Strollerderby

"Shot Down": Babble Investigates the Anti-Vaccination Movement

Posted by JasonAvant

Show of hands: how many of your kids have had polio? Measles? Mumps? I'd venture to guess that most of you have vaccinated your kids against those and other diseases. There are a surprising number of parents who are opting out of vaccinations, and to many parents (myself included), that decision is seen as irresponsible and fraught with peril - not only for the child in question, but other kids who may come into contact with those who have not been vaccinated.

Over at Babble, reporter Liza Featherstone contributes a thoughtful but tough look at the anti-vaccination movement. She explores the myriad of reasons why some parents choose not to give their kids shots; chief among these are fears of autism, side effects, and actually contracting the disease that the vaccine was supposed to prevent.  According to Featherstone, such fears are based on misinformation, inference, and flawed logic. Indeed, she wonders how it that people are "more willing to believe a random article on the internet than scientists who have spent their lives studying vaccines."

The problem here, notes Featherstone, is that the choice to not vaccinate has repercussions beyond one's own child. Featherstone cites outbreaks of whopping cough in Colorado, a state with a considerable number of "vaccine resistors" (also of note but not mentioned in the piece: an outbreak of mumps in the Midwest last year and another outbreak of measles in Boston - in the measles case, the outbreak was traced back to a computer programmer from India, a country where only 56% of the population is thought to be vaccinated against the disease. Gee.) So - to vaccinate, or not? Tell us what you think.


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Arthritis Information And Treatment» Blog Archive » Foot-care for diabetes (arthritis remedy) said:

March 27, 2007 10:40 AM
 

viciousrumours said:

The only vaccination I have chosen not to give my daughter is Gardasil.  It's to new and has not been proven to actutally prevent cervical cancer.  The marketing for the product says it "may" prevent "some" types....to new, to vauge. I don't want my daughter to be a guinea pig.

Other than that, both of my children are vaccinated against all common childhood diseases. My daughter just had her boosters, as did I...yes, I keep up with my MMR and Tetnus boosters, every ten years.  My family also gets flu shoots every year.

March 27, 2007 10:43 AM
 

vlb72 said:

I really have to comment on this one.  And I have to state up-front, that I am a research scientist in microbial ecology.  I do *not* work with vaccines, so I don't feel I have a vested (ie, "defensive”) stance on them.  However 9 years of university and a Ph.D. in biological interactions makes me feel like my opinion on them is credible.  As a mother to a beautiful 2.5 year old, I also feel that I can understand the emotions that motivate the anti-vaccinators.

As the primary article mentions, the article that linked autism to vaccination has not met the (extremely conservative) scientific criteria for acceptance.  The top-tier research journal (The Lancet) that published the article AND 10/12 of the article's authors have retracted it.  Even prior to this, the putative chances of contracting autism as a result of vaccination were much, much, much lower than those of contracting the disease from an unvaccinated population.  For those who argue that their unvaccinated child has remained healthy:  this is NOT due to improved hygiene, vigilant parenting, etc.  It is due to a lack of exposure to the disease.  The author even describes this by pointing out that the unvaccinated child is surrounded by vaccinated children - in biology, this is called "herd immunity."  As the immunity of the herd breaks down (ie, more children are unvaccinated, or cases of polio/mumps/etc are "imported" by unvaccinated children traveling to exotic locales), ALL children become more vulnerable and we will approach the disease contraction rates of the unvaccinated population.

Regarding the argument that a parent would feel “selfish” by vaccinating their child for travel to exotic locations where the locals don’t have the same luxury.  Rather than jeopardizing your child, why not work to help those locals?  As part of your pre-trip planning with your child, contact your local Red Cross and find out what it would cost to donate 5, 10, or 100 doses of a vaccine to the community you are visiting, and how best to go about it.  Or figure out how many doses a small percentage of the cost of your trip would provide.  Don’t avoid being selfish by withdrawing something from your child, avoid being selfish by GIVING something to other children.

I am one of the first to admit that the field of medicine is one of the most ecologically unfriendly professions in the world.  It is true that disease is a natural population control, and as our current population booms we are forced to make choices that compromise our planet even as we choose our best current practices for disease control, pest control, and energy consumption.  However, am I willing to make my child a sacrifice to ecological health?  No.  I know I’m a hypocrite.  So, every day when I go to work, I research practices that will perhaps offset the “ecological indulgence” I (and other like-minded parents) have chosen to commit by vaccinating our families.  

March 27, 2007 11:32 AM
 

Grammy said:

As a vetran teacher, let me just say that I am all for vaccinations.  We have enough sickness in the school without exposing your child to the unnecessary risk of major diseases.  These are health risks that can be prevented so why  not take advantage of it.  I don't know about Gardisil but I do know that Small Pox, Measles, and Mumps could end up causing major problems if people stopped getting the shots.  I hope and wish that parents would weigh the options more carefully before they say no shots.

March 27, 2007 1:09 PM
 

MissB said:

vlb72:

"As part of your pre-trip planning with your child, contact your local Red Cross and find out what it would cost to donate 5, 10, or 100 doses of a vaccine to the community you are visiting, and how best to go about it.  Or figure out how many doses a small percentage of the cost of your trip would provide.  Don’t avoid being selfish by withdrawing something from your child, avoid being selfish by GIVING something to other children."

That is really cool.  Thanks for the awesome suggestion.  

March 27, 2007 1:55 PM
 

required said:

I decided not to vaccinate for my daughter's first year. I was on leave, so she wasn't going to be in daycare, and especially for her first six months, was not going to be coming into contact with many of the things that would increase her chance of contracting vaccination diseases (ie. tetanus at 3 months, hepatitis b). My daughter is healthy, intelligent, and does not have polio, or scarlet fever.

Being informed does not mean you make a particular decision, it mean you think and research before you make any decision. Whether that means delayed vaccinations, by the book schedule, or none at all.

Just another perspective.

March 27, 2007 2:23 PM
 

dontletstart said:

Just a quick reply to the previous post - you didn't plan to have you daughter out and in contact with anything you perceived as a risk but things can and do happen which are beyond our control.

If something had happened where she needed to go to the hospital, for example, you'd have no idea what she'd be exposed to and she would then be at a greater risk of picking up something unrelated to her reason for being there.

It is great it didn't happen, but you just don't know.

March 27, 2007 7:02 PM
 

fortytworoads said:

It's amazing to me to consider the level of selfishness and hubris inherent in the decision not to vaccinate one's child. It is basically a decision to leech off the healthy practices of a community while not only not contributing to the health of that community in any way, but even working against the overall health of its members. I just find it really shocking. I am the mother of a 16 month old and absolutely could imagine refusing to immunize her, nor can I understand how anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of biology could choose not to vaccinate.

March 28, 2007 2:22 PM
 

Sheri said:

I have an autistic son.  When I had his brother 13 years later I was scared to death to have him vaccinated, but I did it because I didn't want him to catch any of the illnesses he would be vaccinated against.  

It is a shame these parents are not only not concerned about their children's well-being, but they are willing to throw other's children under the bus too.

March 28, 2007 3:18 PM
 

Mae said:

This is my take on it. While unexpected things can happen and do happen. Just as you wait for a child to develop their digestive tract, you should allow them to develop their immune system before giving it a boost. I am tired of hearing the same old stories about Africa and other third world countries (I do donate to these countries in hopes of helping). I chose to wait to vaccinate my children until they were a year old. They are now up to date on all their vaccines because I went in every other month to have a new one done. Waiting is a viable option and not harming you or society. Vaccines are not 100%. Getting them in the early months of life isn't going to guarantee your child a lifetime free of disease (even the ones they are vaccinated against). The whooping cough that was spoken about in the original post may have come about because of a group of people not vaccinated against it in that one area. But we had a case of that go around the school I worked at a couple years back and all the children were up to date on their vaccines (it was a small school, I was in charge of admissions that is how I know). Just as there are diseases resistant to antibiotics there exist strains resistant to Vaccines not just because your neighbor didn't get vaccinated but because vaccines are not 100%. Whether we like it or not parents ultimately have say in how they choose to parent, care for, and safe guard their children. Read the argument around banning smoking in cars with children and you will see our government cannot choose for everyone.

March 29, 2007 10:19 AM
 

Strollerderby said:

I'm coming to the conclusion that I've been hiding my head in the sand for several years now when it comes to certain parenting issues. My happy little parenting Bubble Of Goodness. I think a lot had to do with being immersed in a Waldorf school

August 21, 2007 11:52 AM

About JasonAvant

Jason Avant is the Founder and Managing Editor of DadCentric, a groundbreaking and popular blog that, according to his agent, provides an offbeat look at events and issues that affect today's fathers. He also writes for Maya's Mom, and his personal blog, Pet Cobra. Jason lives and works in San Diego, Calif. with his wife and two-year old son. His hobbies include surfing, skateboarding, muttering under his breath, haggis tasting, macrame', and writing short descriptions about himself in the third person.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage