Strollerderby

Educational Toys = Not So Educational

Posted by Karen Murphy

educational toys babyIt turns out that the educational baby-toy market has it all wrong: the only toy babies really need is you! A new study looked at 12,500 children at ages six months, 18, 30, and 42 months, and determined that one-to-one interaction and outings to the store or to parks have a greater and long-term impact on development of a child than did educational toys such as pre-school computers and electronic activity boards.

Leapfrog? You can throw it away. Especially if it has anything to do with Dora. Baby Einstein? Forget it. Apparently from the research conducted, it resulted that what children crave is personal attention.

Who knew! Personally, I always thought that babies were kind of like decoration: stick 'em in a corner (nobody puts Baby in a corner!) strapped in an Exersaucer or something and give them some interactive plastic noise-making battery-sucking toy to keep them quiet. Right?

Kidding. I so am kidding. But while I certainly don't begrudge anyone those much-needed respites in order to preserve sanity, I also agree with these guys that babies and young children won't develop without interaction, and lots of it. Most children, mine included, have way too many toys, far more than they need, and most would be happier simply with some time spent with Mom and Dad.

Guilt-inducing? Perhaps. As always, like with anything: balance.  



+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

pinkpinkmoon said:

I hope that my kid's grandparents read this article.

May 21, 2007 10:16 AM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage