Strollerderby

Pureed Baby Food: "Unnatural and Unnecessary," According to UK Scientists

Posted by Alisyn

British research says feeding babies pureed baby food could cause health problems later in life, and that, in keeping with the World Health Organization's recommendations, babies should be fed only breastmilk or formula for the first six months of life, then weaned onto solids.

According to Gill Rapley, Director General of Unicef's Baby Friendly Initiative, and the founder of the infant nutrition program Baby Led Weaning, after 6 months children are capable of taking food into their mouths and chewing it, and that feeding them pureed food at this time could delay the development of chewing skills.  She also argued that babies fed pureed food had little control over how much food they ate, thus rendering them vulnerable to constipation, and the risk of becoming "fussy eaters" later in life.

Gill says, "Sound scientific research and government advice now agree that there is no longer any window of a baby's development in which they need something more than milk and less than solids."

While some doctors and parents would agree with this philosophy, others may argue that not all babies are ready for solids at 6 months, and that some 4 to 5 month olds demand it - what to do then?  Throw the transitional purees out the window, and move right on to steak and potatoes? 

Pediatric gastroenterologist David Candy says no.  "Some babies could manage this, but others may not have the oromotor skills necessary to chew the food - they would just push it out of their mouths."  Purees are a generations-old transitional food that does actually help some babies master the chewing and swallowing skills that come more easily to others.


 

One thing that doesn't help babies anywhere?  This kind of "one size fits all" parenting advice.  If I had tried to shove solids down my older daughter's gullet at 6 months, she would have been traumatized - she nursed almost exclusively for the first year.  But if I had waited any longer than the 4 months I waited to start purees with my younger daughter, she would have starved to death - despite nursing around the clock and eating everything she could get her tiny hands on, from dog hair to carpet fuzz. 

Bottom line?  Listen to your kid, not "research."  You're the only expert in that department.


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

JulieT said:

Hear, hear. My first daughter was hungry all the time at 4.5 months, so matter how much she nursed, and anyone could see she desperately wanted some of this food she saw us eating. We started her with purees, and she loved them, and was on to solids at 6 months.

My second wasn't interested in anything but nursing until she was 6 months, but she couldn't have handled solids then--no teeth at all!

June 18, 2007 3:27 PM
 

Kin said:

My kids definitely fit this mould, although some kids aren't ready for solids at 6 months either,

My 2nd went from exclusively formula to lamb chops & veg in 3 days at nearly 11 months. She gave up formula completely at 11.5 months and was on 4 meals a day.

Kids are ready when they're ready.

June 18, 2007 9:53 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage