Strollerderby

Hey, Pixar: Can We Get a Girl Star in an Animated Movie?

In another life, I taught Women Studies at a university and one of my areas of research was women in the media. I taught classes and workshops on gender stereotypes embedded in advertisements, movies and children's books. Some misogynistic representations of women were subtle, some were violent and overt, but none were as controversial as Disney.

There were very few topics that students were as resistant to thinking about or analyzing as classic Disney, or any other children's movie or book for that matter. Homophobia discussions? No problem. Lectures on the history of abortion rights? Not to worry. Disagree with the little mouse about the many ways in which women were killed, neglected, saved only by good looks and a powerful man, whittled away from celluloid strength and power? Oooh, too taboo.

Liz Kelly has stumbled upon her own kid flick controversy over at Celebritology, only this one's about about Pixar. Sparked by seeing Ratatouille, she says loud and clear that there aren't any female leads in their movies -- not just not enough, not any. I love it that she not only raises up Pixar for their gutsiness, originality and for creating characters - both female and male -- that are strong and engaging and independent-minded, but that she also compares their movies to the Disney classics that are a disappointment for parents wanting their kids to see strong girls and boys take the lead on-screen. She admits she can't wait for her son to see the Pixar movies she loves but says she also hopes that when that time comes, Pixar's busy promoting a movie featuring a girl.

The not-so-surprising thing is that the reader comments are equally as loud as Liz Kelly's assertion, and not all of them are cheering her on. In fact, the comments hit so close to home for me that I almost took attendance and handed out grades for analytical inquiry. Even though lots of these readers roll their eyes and throw flames, I think it is really right on for her to admit her love for Pixar but to also ask them to do what they do even better. No matter how Bambi or Nemo loving you are, how can you argue with that?


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Kaz said:

I dunno. It may have been called Finding Nemo, but Dory stole the movie, IMHO.

July 2, 2007 8:52 PM
 

Celebritology Junkie said:

While I adore Liz Kelly, the fabulous piece you are referencing was actually written by Jen Chaney, the substitute celebritologist last Friday.

And on topic: I completely agree with Chaney.  Enough of the "Disney Princesses" as the characters girls identify with and carry on their backpacks.

July 2, 2007 9:19 PM
 

LogicalMama said:

Yes, Dory in Nemo. Thanks Kaz!

Elastigirl and Violet in The Incredibles.

Sally in Cars blew Lightening McQueen off the road when they took their drive.

Cowgirl Jess in Toy Story 2 was quite a force to be reckoned with.

July 2, 2007 9:52 PM
 

StubbyDog said:

Pixar does make strong women characters...but they are SUPPORTING characters, not leads.  While they may steal the show and be marvelous characters, that doesn't make them leads.

I'd also like to see Pixar do some female lead characters.

July 2, 2007 11:39 PM
 

University Update - Ratatouille - Hey, Pixar: Can We Get a Girl Star in an Animated Movie? said:

July 2, 2007 11:51 PM
 

JustADad said:

Yeah, I agree, they should do a female lead. Problem is, they already have their next three movies either in production, or moving toward production, so we're looking at 4-5 years for a female lead character from Pixar (this is on the assumption that Toy Story 3 will not feature a female lead).

July 3, 2007 8:03 AM
 

selfmademom said:

I have a similiar problem related to this about the show Thomas and Friends- finally they introduce some female trains and what not, but the voices for the female characters are in "high pitched" voice overs by the male narrator! Why can't they hire a woman to speak the female parts in the show? Sheesh.

July 3, 2007 9:59 AM
 

amy said:

I agree 100%.  When the story is told it is always from the male perspective. Yes the Incredibles had females but it was the wife and daughter, we weren't taken through the story by either, they were characters not the focus.  Same goes for Cowgirl Jess and Dory, they are sidekicks. Why not having finding Nemo where the mom doesn't die but the father leaves or the Incredibles when we go to work with Elasticgirl not Mr. Incredible, or Toy Story told from Cowgirl Jess' experience.  Save Dora the Explorer and a bunch of Princess movies or Brat Girls... not a lot of strong positve roles models for girls.  Pixar could definately pick up the slack...

then maybe there would be more mainstream movies where women are the focus along the way too!!! (same theory goes for most films out there.)

July 3, 2007 1:55 PM
 

sisco said:

They're never going to give us the female lead.... Honestly, I'm tired of complaining. And, sure, it's great that we can all love pixar (disney; sendak; uh, potter; etc) anyway, but serious SERIOUS what besides complaining and endlessly pointing it out and anaylyzing this kind of phenomenon among so many others (I, too, used to teach women's studies) are we going to do? Yikes, I don't want my kid to miss out on movies and great books, so I teach her along with the rest of us to dis-identify, to use jose munoz's term, I think. Yuck. Ugh. and so on.

July 3, 2007 2:02 PM
 

Aruni said:

I agree that they need more female leads in their movies.  The supporting female characters are wonderful but they aren't the leads.  

I wonder what about their market research indicates that doing movies with a male lead would sell more movies?

Personally, I'd be thrilled if Disney would do more movies where one or both of the parents aren't killed off or aren't even mentioned (e.g., Bambi, Cinderella, Nemo, etc.).  Interestingly, quite often it's the mother who is not there...makes me wonder.

July 3, 2007 3:00 PM
 

wwbd said:

I bet that the market research does show that more people will see a male lead movie (kids or otherwise) than a female lead. Female lead movies are "chick flicks" which immediately turns (some) men (and some women) off. Whereas no one thinks twice about a male lead, but a female lead would be a novelty. Kind of a catch-22. You need to make many movies with female leads until they become ubiquitous, but not many will see the first ones thus discouraging the production of more.

July 3, 2007 4:17 PM
 

sisco said:

The market(ing) doesn't lie. There are more male leads because that's what we want and expect, in life and in movies, in general or as a majority. The catch (22?) is that the more we see male leads the more we want them. Ha! (If we believe that culture helps to shape who we are, that is.)

July 3, 2007 6:43 PM
 

Lois said:

check out geena davis' charity on this subject.

http://www.seejane.org/

really interesting facts and research

July 3, 2007 10:03 PM
 

Kaz said:

I thnk the reason Disney makes so many movies with just one or no parents is because kids seem to have this fascination with kids who are orphans.

My wife still does - Annie, Little Princess, etc.

I try to warn my in-laws, but...

July 4, 2007 8:52 PM

About Jessica Ashley (Sassafrass)

Stop staring at my shoes and read my posts, people. There are more important things in life than adorable heels purchased at reduced designer prices. Like, I don't know, changing the channel from Dragon Tales to Caillou so you have another 22 minutes to read my posts.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage