Strollerderby

Direct Link Between Food Additives and Hyperactivity Proven

Posted by Alisyn

The link between food additives and hyperactivity has long been suspected, but the study done by Jim Stevenson, professor of psychology at the University of Southampton, U.K., is the first to show a direct link. 

While Stevenson and his colleagues are quick to point out that "no one factor is solely responsible for rising rates of ADHD," the British government has wasted no time warning parents of kids showing signs of hyperactivity to cut out foods with artificial colors and preservatives, and honestly, parents all over the world would do well to follow suit. 

Over the six-week course of study, kids of various ages were given a drink similar to the widely available, ubiquitous "fruit drinks" we all buy now and then, containing various coloring and preserving agents (as a control, another group of kids was given drinks free of colors and preservatives.)  Stevenson's team found that children in both age groups who drank the drinks containing additives displayed significantly more hyperactive behavior and shorter attention spans.  It is not known which specific additives caused hyperactive reactions in the kids, but hopefully, we can assume that the study will be continued, in depth. 

Interestingly, the U.S.D.A.'s website insists that  "although this theory (that additives and preservatives cause hyperactivity) was popularized in the 1970's, well-controlled studies conducted since that time have produced no evidence that food additives cause hyperactivity or learning disabilities in children. A Consensus Development Panel of the National Institutes of Health concluded in 1982 that there was no scientific evidence to support the claim that additives or colorings cause hyperactivity." 

Um... yeah....

I don't know about you, but my pediatrician has been warning me about food colorings and preservatives for years.  As the mom of a kid with allergies and sensitivities, I tend to err on the side of caution and go out of my way to avoid them.  And as an American, I tend to take the U.S.D.A.'s "well-controlled studies," as total bullshit;  Anyone who says it's okay to pump livestock and poultry full of antibiotics, hormones and other livestock and poultry, and call it "good for you," clearly doesn't have my - or my kid's - best interest in mind.


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

spartic99 said:

While it is completely your prerogative to take what the U.S.D.A. says with a grain of salt, lets not sell the whole farm based on a SINGLE study that reports there is link between food coloring and hyperactivity. I mean, the test was only SIX weeks long. A real, effective and truly academic study takes years and will have been submitted to another year or more of peer review before making such blatant statements. This "scientist" is just another degreed profesional with an agenda.

September 11, 2007 11:46 AM
 

maiaoming said:

At this point, I pretty much take everything the FDA says as total bullshit. Remember what they did during the early days of AIDS? The members of the FDA are paid off or part of moneyed interests in industry. They never err on the side of caution. They take a 'let's wait and see if in 50 years GM foods give everyone cancer' stance. I prefer to follow EU guidelines.

What agenda could a scientist have? Certainly he's not going to make tons of money when consumers start not buying preservatives... come on.

September 11, 2007 11:56 AM
 

diera said:

I'm sorry, but one study never definitively proves anything.  Furthermore, it seems pretty selective to dismiss studies that don't agree with what you already think, but hail the study that agrees with what you already think as proof.

I don't have any personal opinion about food additives; my older child doesn't seem to have problems with them, but I have friends who avoid them for their kids and think it makes a difference, and it may well do so.  I also haven't read this study and it may be well-designed and of high quality (and the Lancet is a very good journal so it's not junk science).  Nevertheless, one study doesn't constitute proof.

September 11, 2007 1:16 PM
 

Grammy said:

I am 55 Years old this year and a teacher.  I totally agree with the British study.  I have thought it for years.  I watched my Niece grow up with allergies and she could really freak out when she ate that stuff.  The USDA doesn't know their way around the park in full daylight.

September 11, 2007 1:37 PM
 

spartic99 said:

"What agenda could a scientist have?"

If you are really asking that question, you have much bigger problems to worry about then food additives.

September 11, 2007 1:50 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage