Strollerderby

Update on Onslaught: Do We Pay For Hypocrisy?

Posted by Kelly Mills

axe ickYou might remember I posted the "Onslaught" video from Dove last month, and the thing got lots of attention for highlighting how much body image crap our girls get bombarded with daily. But almost as fast as the video hit the internet, there were cries of foul from many corners. See, Dove's parent company Unilever is also responsible for a bunch of cruddy ads, including the spots for Axe deoderant body spray for guys, which imply, to be blunt, that wearing Axe will get you lots of pussy.

I was thinking about this whole thing again after this great op-ed appeared in the Boston Globe. And I think its a real valid question we have to ask ourselves: Can companies highlight issues like how the beauty industry affects girls while also hawking beauty products that don't exactly send a nice message to those same girls? If the Onslaught campaign has a positive effect on people, is that enough, and should we ignore what other arms of Unilever are doing? Was this a case of social consciousness-raising or just clever marketing? Cuz I'm sure this won't be the only corporation caught sending wildly contradictory messages. 

What do you think? 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Mom2Two said:

While I like the Dove campaign a lot more than ads like Axe, it still is, in reality, advertising to sell products.  "Feel good about yourself! You are beautiful!  By the way, buy our firming cream so you can be more beautiful!"  As usual, it all comes down to making money.  I think you have to take things like television ads with a grain of salt.

November 8, 2007 11:34 AM
 

schadenfreudette said:

I think another contradictory message being sent is that we need to be especially careful with the self-esteem of our daughters; but our sons?  Not so much.  One of the bothersome things about the Axe body spray ads (aside from setting up unrealistic portrayals of women) is the message to young boys that hey!  If you get chicks, then you're a cool dude!  Buy our cologne and chicks will flock!  How is that sending a good message to young boys?  (And yes, young boys wear the stuff.  Everytime I smell it I think of my 9 year old nephew who fairly bathes in it. Not sexy. I assure you.)

November 8, 2007 12:59 PM
 

Claire said:

I like my realism mixed with a little idealism. The fact is that most brands are owned by a handful of massive global corporations. As consumers, I think we should absolutely speak up when a brand's messages are offensive (e.g. Axe's mo' stanky cologne, mo' action ads). But does one brand's b.s. negate another brand's positive impact? I don't think so.

The Dove Campaign for Real Beauty is ultimately about building brand loyalty, but they are taking a different and more provocative approach than most beauty companies and I can get behind that. At the end of the day, Unilever is looking at brand performance in addition to their bottom line. So wouldn't it be nice if they learned that advertising with socially responsible messaging gets a better return on investment than predictable, sexist crap? Yeah, that's the idealism talking.

November 8, 2007 3:33 PM
 

Pete Aldin said:

It's clearly clever marketing. I have boys and I'm so pissed off (from the other side of the gender pool) about the way these ads are portraying women (and GIRLS) to them... Grrrr... Makes it very difficult to raise them as gentleman.

Oh, and ... are you saying that Axe DOESN'T?! Damn, that money was sure wasted ...

November 9, 2007 5:58 PM
 

Candace said:

http://twoknives.net/?p=346

two knives has had me using my brain too much on this issue.

this was a great post with great comments.

I have been thinking so very much about how we are raising our sons.

lilacspecs go me thinking about it with this post

lilacspecs.blogspot.com/.../littluns.html

I'm all crazy about getting my daughter to play soccer instead of princess but I need to start thinking about TV and Video Games marketed toward my son.  (he's only 17 months but ya know one day...)

November 9, 2007 11:28 PM
 

Jennifer said:

It's always about $$. Dove just wants to make some, just like everyone else.

November 11, 2007 4:25 AM
 

Angus said:

The message isn't coming from the mega-corp, it's coming from each unique brand.

Dove's message is popular because it resonates with its demographic. It's a great concept to market to 'real women' because that's exactly who is deciding to buy their product.

Axe's message is probably quite popular with its demo, too, but I'm not it. Kind of like those stupid Pizza Pop tv ads from years back -- didn't do a thing for me, but my 10 year old cousin loved the spots.

It's the goal of every ad to bring some kind of action from the audience and Dove's message conveys a warm, fuzzy feeling to us because it's a message their demographic desperately wants to hear in today's marketplace. Axe is just selling body spray, while Dove is selling an ideal. In the end, they're both selling something.

If social change happens as a spin-off of a marketing campaign, that's one hell of a campaign. Dove is hitting the right buttons.

But interesting that this kind of thing could make people feel betrayed by Dove and its parent company. MAN, freaking brands are so powerful, sometimes it truly amazes me.

Also, isn't Kraft part of the Philip Morris umbrella?!

November 13, 2007 2:01 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage