A new study in Australia reports that some Australian women are breastfeeding their kids until age seven. And the kids like it.
Yeah, I'll bet they do. "Children enjoy the taste of the milk, the comfort it brings and the closeness to their mother." Well, yeah. But...seven years old? Isn't that a bit much?
But the moms seem to like it too, feeding up to a dozen times a day, and one women nursing THREE kids. Three.
So while I'm all kind of ewww about this, I've got to remember that one of my kids went until age three and a half and I only stopped then because I was pregnant with her brother and it hurt like hell. And like the Aussie mums, I never intended to go that long necessarily, but there was no reason to stop before then. By that time she nursed only a few times a day or when she needed comfort or was sick. And while I can't even begin to imagine her nursing now at age seven, I can see how these things just go on and on. Kind of, anyway.
But...ew. Still can't quite get past it. I mean, I'm thinking "not for me, please." But at the same time, I can see it happening for other women. But not for me, please.
But some people have a much bigger problem with extended breastfeeding than just the ewww factor. Psychologists say things like, "It's not normal, the umbilical cord needs to be broken," and "You have to wonder if it's for the child or the mother - I bet it's for the mother." Hmm, was the psychologist even breastfed at all? Do I detect a note of resentment there? Are they suggesting these women employ the chestity belt and cut the cord? Are we thinking Freudian stuff here?
Historically, worldwide, children often breastfed until age six or so and still do in some cultures. So what's our problem with it? Beyond, of course, the "rough breastfeeding, acrobatics, nipple twiddling and inconvenient requests," all the things that make extended breastfeeding sound so attractive. I think I'd be donning the chestity belt at that point.
[image source metroactive.com, pastel by Kerri Lawnsby]