Strollerderby

Don't Fear the Fever

Posted by Karen Murphy

fever kidFever! Just the very word sends fear striking at parent's hearts: Fever! Fevers are bad! Cuz, well, look at the kid! Hot! Uncomfortable! And hot! That has to be bad, right? Oh, and fever can kill! Kids can explode, can get brain damage, whatever. It's just...bad, that fever, right? Bad! Must medicate! Must take Tylenol/Motrin/have an alcohol bath/sponge bath. Must! Because fever = B.A.D.

Um, except, it's not. And this is why: 

I remember when I learned the truth about fevers in children. It was scary letting go of all those notions about fever that I learned from my parents as a child during my twice-yearly bouts of strep throat, when I'd be forced to chew tiny orange St. Joseph's aspirin tablets, or worse, swallow fuzzy white terrible-tasting tablets in order to Get.The.Fever.Down.

It turns out I could have been spared all that aspirin. Except in extreme cases, fevers are actually, well, good. But about 94% of parents don't know this (thank you, acetaminophen industry! and the thermometer industry!). I didn't. We parents are afraid of fever, and fever is the #1 reason why doctors are called in the middle of the night or kids are rushed to the ER. Fever. Which is actually the body's defense against illness, and (except in extreme cases), is a good thing.

Fever reduces bacterial and viral reproduction and signals the immune system to get in gear. Febrile seizures? They're likely caused by how quickly a fever rises, not to the amount of fever, and they don't cause permanent damage. Nor do high fevers (officially defined as above 105.8 degrees). 

Though doctors could learn a thing or two about this: "In a 1992 study of 234 pediatricians, two-thirds said that an elevated body temperature in itself could be dangerous to a child. They believed that brain damage and death were fever's worst outcomes. And we doctors again showed our ignorance in a study whose authors wanted to know why pediatricians were telling parents to alternate Tylenol and Motrin to control fevers. This is something that doctors routinely advise parents to do. About a third cited guidelines on fever management from the American Academy of Pediatrics. Another quarter said they learned it from their teachers or mentors. The problem is that there is nothing in academy guidelines about alternating antipyretics, and, at the time of the study, there was no evidence showing that doing this was effective and safe (now there are studies suggesting that it may be effective, but the risk of misdosing or overdosing a child doesn't warrant it)."

Uh, that's scary, that even doctors don't know what's what. 

But for several years now I've heard a different approach to fever, and I've learned to almost welcome it as a help in fighting whatever illness seems to be going on.

But in kids, you really have to look at their comfort to know when to treat a fever and when to leave it alone. If they look comfortable, as they might with even moderately high fevers, there's no need to seek medical attention. Ice water baths induce shivering, which makes kids less comfortable, and alcohol baths increase the risk of dehydration and hypoglycemia, so neither of those is a good idea.

However, if your child has five to seven days of fever, you can't bring down high fevers (above 104 degrees), or there are other symptoms (rashes, lethargy inconsolable crying, a headache or stiff neck that could suggest meningitis), you need to see a doctor.

Otherwise, embrace the fever, and likely the length of illness will be reduced and within a day or two you'll have a happy kid again. 

If Ferris Bueller's parents had known this, he'd have had a totally different day.

Photo: www.therapy-school.co.uk


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

erin said:

I know that fever is "good" and the body's way to fight infection.  But my kids are extremely fussy when they have a fever (and so am I!) so I always give them motrin and a bath.  Is there really anything wrong with that?  Will the body stop (or slow down) fighting the infection because you brought the fever down?

January 8, 2008 12:16 PM
 

Tracey said:

Before my daughter had a febrile seizure I actually was very hands off about fevers.  But while it is easy to say febrile seizures don't cause permanent damage - after watching my 3 year old suffer one I became an advocate of the Tylenol/Motrin alternation plan.  

January 8, 2008 2:05 PM
 

Dwtintx said:

Tracey, I am with you.  My daughter has had two febrile seizures in her 17 month long life, and while I realize that they are due to the spike in temperature and not the ongoing fever, it is more than enough to keep me controlling it with Motrin and Tylenol.  Those don't usually bring it down all the way anyway, just where she's a little more comfortable.

January 8, 2008 7:48 PM
 

Andrea said:

As an ER nurse I want to interject that kids under 1 year with a high fever (above 104) should be seen, and babies under 3 months should be taken in to be seen if their fever is above 100.4 rectally.  There is a much higher risk of meningitis or sepsis in these kids because they are not fully vaccinated.  

Other than that, please stay home!  Your kids are just as likely to pick up something nasty in the ER as they are to really need a lot of tests.  

Your best bet is to call your pediatrician (there is someone on call 24 hours a day) and see how they feel.  You did the research to choose them, trust their judgement.  

January 9, 2008 9:35 AM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage