Strollerderby

Seinfelds Get Sued For Plagiarism and Slander

Posted by Kelly Mills

oh no, she's there on her own meritsOh, perhaps you remember the saga of the hidden vegetable cookbooks? Jessica Seinfeld came out with a book on secreting vegetables in your kids' food, Deceptively Delicious: Simple Secrets to Get Your Kids Eating Good Food. This book bore remarkable similarities to a book that came out a month earlier, by Missy Chase Lapine, called The Sneaky Chef: Simple Strategies for Hiding Healthy Foods in Kids' Favorite Meals. When I posted about this scandal, the publisher commented here and denied plagiarism played any part in Seinfeld's book. Around the same time, Jerry Seinfeld went on Letterman and echoed that denial, adding, "Now you know, having a career in show business, one of the fun facts of celebrity life is wackos will wait in the woodwork to pop out at certain moments of your life to inject a little adrenaline into your life experience." He also went on to comment on Missy Chase Lapine's name, saying, "if you read history, many of the three-name people do become assassins. Mark David Chapman. And you know, James Earl Ray. So that's my concern." Those are the murderers of John Lennon and Martin Luther King, Jr., by the way.

And that, folks, is why the Seinfelds are now being sued by Missy Chase Lapine for slander and plagiarism. But you know what I think is one of the worst parts of this whole thing? In addition to Jerry Seinfeld's supremely asshole-ish comments, the Seinfeld's lawyer just "suggested Lapine was seeking publicity to boost her book's sales." Hold on, I have to count to ten before I get into this. Exhale...two, one.

Now, what I'm getting here is that Jerry Seinfeld says that as a celebrity, he has to deal with wackos who are trying to get press by targeting the famous. And the Seinfeld lawyer is calling this a publicity stunt. But wait, why did Jessica Seinfeld's book get so much attention over Lapine's in the first place? Why was she so "promotable"? How did she get on Oprah and a billion other talk shows and in newspapers and magazines and even here on Babble? Was it because she has had an illustrious cooking career, made a name for herself as an excellent child nutrition expert?

Naw. It was because she's married to a famous guy. So every time the Seinfelds get pissy with Lapine over supposed coattail-riding, I guess we can all scratch our heads and say, hmmmm. So it's okay to saddle up on someone else's fame at the expense of struggling authors, but those authors better back off the Seinfelds. That's just shame-to-the-less. Aaaand we even said it last time, too. 

Oh, and it's messed up to use your fame and the many forums it brings to call someone a nut, too.  


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

MamaT said:

Good for Lapine.  Seinfeld was an ass.

January 8, 2008 7:25 PM
 

bookmama said:

Okay, he was out of line with the first part of his comments, but if I remember correctly, Jerry Seinfeld is a comedian and I would imagine that he was just trying to be funny, and the joke fell flat. I'm sure if he really was concerned about an assassination attempt or thought she was mentally unbalanced, he would not have said so in public. And to some extent, he's probably right about her doing it for the publicity - after all, I never heard of Lapine until the second book came out, and it's unlikely she was suddenly going to sweep the culinary world off its feet with her recipes for hiding peas in a burger or whatever. I'm willing to bet that far more people have picked up her book due to this feud than they ever would have had Jessica Seinfeld not published her recipes.

Also, the calls of plagiarism are unlikely - just because the book was published a few months later doesn't mean that it wasn't already in production by the time the first book came out. What, Jessica Seinfeld caught wind of Lapine's masterpiece and jumped up and said, "Hey! I'm going to run to the kitchen and whip up a bunch of weird recipes so that I can compete with this totally random cookbook?" I'm dubious.

January 8, 2008 10:52 PM
 

Stefania Pomponi Butler (CityMama) said:

Finally!  He's such a smug fuck, I hate him. His comments about Lapine were waaaay out of line, but the one that got me was how he his wife didn't need to write the book because (smirk) "she doesn't need the money."

I hope she wins and wins BIG.

January 9, 2008 2:00 AM
 

catem said:

I hope Lapine gets his Hamptons house AND the city one, too.  He's such an ass and she's not much better... where do we even start... wasn't she Nora from the Bronx or something like that??  

Apparently, Lapine's book had been making the rounds so that would make it fairly easy to see a manuscript before getting published... especially if you have a few friends in good places.

ps - AS IF she even cooks - ugh, please.

January 9, 2008 5:00 AM
 

chyna823 said:

bookmama, you're right that Seinfeld's book was probably already in production when Lapine's came out. However, Seinfeld's production house actually considered Lapine's manuscript and decided against it, then met with Seinfeld just a few weeks later. That's what makes the whole thing so fishy.

January 9, 2008 10:48 AM
 

GeorgieWorld said:

I dont blame the Lapine woman for taking the book to court- how bummed out would you be if you thought you had this awesome idea and then wrote a book about it and one month later another person was on Oprah selling basically the same book! I would sue just for the publicity too.

January 9, 2008 12:34 PM
 

shannoninaz said:

I actually bought the Lapine book when it first came out and wasn't even aware of Seinfeld's until the controversy started.  As a mom of a picky eater I'm always on the hunt for good ideas.  At the time I thought it was odd that Seinfeld was getting so much press when I had just purchased a book on the same thing...

January 9, 2008 2:07 PM
 

mamaloo said:

I was writing articles on sneaking veggies into my kid's food on my blog before Lapine's book came out, however, in looking at my work, Lapine's work and Seinfeld's work it is eminently clear that little Ms Seinfeld and her book editor were working off a very specific template when writing the second book.

Logos that are suspiciously similar (after having been requested to be changed), structure of the book, layout similarities, suspiciously similar phrases, language and anecdotes, virtually the same recipes, exactly the same method for hiding the veggies (they used purees, I just used chopped veggies)...

And apparently Lapine never issued any statements regarding the weird similarities, though she had been aware of them before Seinfeld's book was published. The Seinfeld's public statements about Lapine being a publicity whore stem entirely from the internet's response when all of us blogging mum's starting wondering why Seinfeld published a book that had already been published six months before.

January 9, 2008 8:53 PM
 

bookmama said:

Oooh chyna, I did not know that. That IS rather stinky...

Also, if anyone is into smuggling veggies into food, I made a chili the other day and threw in four cubes of pureed carrots. My husband hates cooked carrots but I just figured I would try it. Guess what? He said it was the best chili I've made!

That sounded very Mrs. Cleaverish. Let me go put on my heels and vacuum.

January 12, 2008 11:59 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage