Strollerderby

Clean Hands: Purell Ain't Getting It Done

Posted by Madeline Holler

We had a nice but icky discussion last week about how healthcare professionals weren't exactly scrupulous when it comes to washing their hands between patients (and door touching, etc.) and that patients are being encouraged to ask them to wash up. And there was some talk of hidden hand santizer pumps that they might be using outside the patient's room, which made a few of us (and by "us" I mean "me") feel better and like they could go on living in denial about their doctor's dirty hands. 

Well, a study out of Nebraska got down and dirty and concluded that Purell and the other alcohol-based hand santizers aren't getting it done. Even though a hospital in the study doubled its use of the sanitizing gels, the rate of infections did not decrease. These gels may clean the hands but they don't kill bacteria that cause infections. Ew.

See, the hand gunk doesn't get in all the areas on the hands where the bacteria reside. 

The doctor who studied the problem pointed to many villains: Rings and fingernails that are too long and hard to clean, poor handling of catheters and treatment areas that aren't sanitized.

Is it really such a big deal? Yes.

The spread of infection-causing germs in U.S. hospitals is a huge health problem, accounting for an estimated 1.7 million infections and 99,000 deaths each year, according to the CDC. These include drug-resistant staph, urinary tract infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia, among others.

So we're back to where we were the other day in this discussion. It's up to us to bravely ask doctors and nurses and any other healthcare worker who are about to touch us to wash their hands with soap and warm water if we don't see them do it. And gloves are only sterile if they've been put on by hands that have been washed. And hand sanitizer doesn't count. Can't wait to run that one by my defensive pediatrician.

 

 

 


 

 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Meg said:

So, hand sanitizer smells funky and dries out your skin <i>and</i> it doesn't completely work. Nice!

I read the initial post about handwashing the other day and was ultra appreciative of the docs and nurses at my gyn practice who make a big deal of scrubbing at the exam room sink before and after they're with a patient. My bro is in his final year of RN training and says that patients asking him if he's washed his hands doesn't bother him at all--he likens it to writing "see id" on your credit cards: you're <i>probably</i> who you say you are, but the cashier isn't putting you out when they ask to see your license.

Coincidentally, a woman at another blog I frequent wrote a post today about her three-year old daughter forbiding the doc to touch her because he hadn't washed his hands--in front of a trailing crew of med students! lookthroughoureyes.blogspot.com/.../what-makes-good-doctor.html

January 30, 2008 4:28 PM
 

Larissa said:

In my former life as a hospital program manager, the Infection Control Department implemented the use of a hand sanatizing mousse.  They said the CDC found it "as effective [in killing germs?] for hands that weren't visibly soiled"  I have this ingrained in my head after trying to implement it in the L&D department (a culture notoriously averse to change in that hosp at least).

We also implemented a "no fake nails" rule for anyone who touches patients.  I don't know if it worked or if it was enforced, but they were trying at least.  

But the nurses I saw were pretty lazy about washing hands.  Made me glad I was having my babies elsewhere!

January 30, 2008 8:54 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage