Strollerderby

Yeah, Save the Babies, But What About Environmental Hazards For Moms?

Posted by Kelly Mills

careful with the makeupI will admit that I did not go fully organic until I was pregnant, and all of the sudden became more conscious of the fact that what I put in my body went directly to the fetus I was boarding. Being a host made me care more about environmental hazards, because it wasn't just my health I was worried about anymore. And this is part of the point one writer makes when she calls attention to crap like phtalates in common products like cosmetics.

She points to a small sample study of umbilical cord blood that found, "an average of 287 contaminants in their cord blood, including mercury, fire retardants, pesticides, phtalates and Teflon's PFOA chemical." And 180 of those contaminants cause cancer. Now, there were only ten samples, which isn't a nice big size for a study, but it certainly makes my eyebrows rise. While it's great to recall toys and set up organic nurseries, if we just pass on toxins to our babies through our own exposures, there's trouble. And, um, we might want to care about the actual health of moms and other adults as well, even if children make our concerns feel more imperative. Careful with that mommy makeover. 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Gracie5 said:

I read that 70% of the chemicals stored in our fatty tissues are passed to our babies during breast-feeding (cited in a 2004 article in the NYT).  This is a hugely important and complicated issue, and people need to get informed and get political about it.  The US has a much more lenient attitude toward chemicals than most other countries (aside from China and India), and they are incredibly effective at slowing global efforts to reduce or eliminate the use of these chemicals (via international agreements like the Montreal Protocol, the Stockholm Convention, etc.).  Women in the US have exceptionally high levels of chemicals in their bodies - much higher than women in most parts of the world.  Individual lifestyle changes can help to a limited degree, but in a lot of cases (flame retardants, for example), chemicals are pervasive and cannot be avoided.  I'm not an expert, and I'm not advocating a knee-jerk reaction, but I do worry about the long-term effects of continued exposure to so many chemicals, and at such high levels.  

February 5, 2008 10:44 AM
 

Autumn said:

Right on Gracie5.  We never use Teflon and I chose to stop breastfeeding when placed on meds for high BP.  I figured filtered water and formula was safer for my child.  I have my mom buy my shampoo when she visits France.  The EU has much stricter protocols about what deadly toxins are allowed in their personal products.

February 5, 2008 11:29 AM
 

Burke said:

You folks are nuts. Yes chemicals and petisides are bad and certainly bad for the Mom and fetus but the EU is NOT better at anything relating to this. My family has lived in Europe for 40 years and it is just as bad as the US. If you want to sound off about chemicals in the US then please do so but stop pointing to other countries. Who cares about the EU. We live here!!!!

March 4, 2008 12:12 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage