Pamela Paul has an essay on Babble today that analyzes the merits of teaching our babies sign language. In the piece, excerpted from
Paul's book, "Parenting Inc.," she finds that there isn't anything wrong with showing infants how to communicate with their hands. But she also discovers that it may not be as overwhelmingly beneficial as the initial studies by Linda Acredolo and Susan Goodwyn, founders of the Baby Signs Institute, suggested.
"Parents who sign to their children are also talking to them — and no
study can prove that talking alone didn't lead to later verbal
advances," Paul writes.
Like so many parents, my husband and I have tried to teach our son a bit of signing, figuring it can't hurt and, potentially, might help him communicate with us. So far it has not been a successful endeavor. I repeatedly gesture -- "Eat. Eat." "More. More." -- when he's buckled into his high chair at meal time and he just looks at me like, "Whatever, lady. Just bust out the Cheerios and get it over with."
I also noticed that the signs I learned differ from the illustrated examples in Paul's piece. So it's entirely possible I actually have been teaching my child to say, "Mom, seriously. Enough with the hand motions."
Have you tried signing with your kids? Did they pick it up more readily than mine? And do you feel it ultimately helped their communication skills?
Unfortunately, we can't use sign language on this blog, but feel free to share your thoughts the old-fashioned way, by typing, in the comments section.
Photo: Babble.com