Strollerderby

Daily Duh: Less junk food leads to weight loss

Posted by Brett Singer

New study: healthy food is healthyThis is a new occasional feature where I'll highlight studies that seem to confirm the obvious.

In Philadelphia, land of the cheese steak, five elementary schools participated in a program where candy and soda were eliminated from the vending machines, and kids were rewarded with raffle tickets for "making healthy food choices." And guess what? If kids eat less sugary snacks, they gain less weight. Astonishing stuff, this.

One interesting finding was that kids spend $2 per day on snacks that add up to about 600 calories, presumably of the junk food kind. Those things come from the corner store, where there may not be a lot of options besides Drake's cakes. The group that conducted the study, The Food Trust, says that they are "working with" local shops to get them to stock more fruit, vegetables and water. Because storeowners love it when people who aren't their customers tell them what to sell.

The language used in the story is very interesting when you consider the climate of weight loss. The writer refers to "kids who got fat" and then switches to "obese" and "overweight". This doesn't give you much information. If a kid is 2 or 3 pounds overweight, is that fat? When does overweight become obese? (I personally prefer the term "fatty-boombalatty", but that's just me.)

Getting kids to eat healthy is important, and it certainly would help if the food offered in school were better for you. My school lunch choices were pizza, hamburger, or cheeseburger, all of which came with French fries, or the disturbing looking hot lunch of the day. The fries were -- and this is not a joke -- "vitamin C enriched," which probably was meant to meet some sort of mandate. A study like this at least calls attention to the issue, which is great, but the conclusions aren't exactly earth shaking.

image: Yahoo.com


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

jamie's mom said:

The "conclusions" the linked article purports aren't supported by the data in the study. junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/.../jfs-special-report-major-findings-on.html

I don't mind replacing junkfood with "healthy" snacks, but I dislike the idea of rewarding children for choosing "healthy" snacks. Treats should be treats and kids should get to ignore carbs and sugar--let the adults deal with the math. Applying virtue to food (as in carrots are "good" and cookies are "bad) is unhealthy. And I'm worried that we implicitly condone the exclusion of the chubby or plump kids when we reward weight loss/maintainence in children.

April 11, 2008 4:49 PM
 

Manjari said:

I worked in the Philadelphia school district for a few years, and I can tell you that the junk food thing is a problem. The junk kids are buying at the corner store (colored sugar water, cakes with tons of sugar and hydrogenated oil, and salty snacks) are replacing actual nutrition. The school lunches are not much better. My kindergarten students would arrive to school at 8 am, eating potato chips and drinking soda on the way to the line. I am actually having a hard time remembering if I EVER saw a morsel of healthy food pass student lips that wasn't brought in by a teacher.

April 12, 2008 9:21 AM

About Brett Singer

Brett Singer is a writer and father living in Manhattan with his wonderful wife and two terrific sons (referred to here as Thing 1 and Thing 2). He writes about music for the Boston Phoenix, parenting for Babble and daddytips.com, and other topics for anyone else who will have him.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage