Strollerderby

Mentally Impaired Mom Loses Seventh Child To Foster Care

Posted by Amy S.F. Lutz

How did a story about a kidnapping evolve into a raging debate about state-sponsored sterilization in the Philadelphia media?

It started when two-month-old Shaniyah Grantby disappeared last Saturday.  Her mother, Tiesha Pitts, 26, had let another woman take Shaniyah to the store, and that woman - later identified as Clarissa Hanton, 23 - never brought her back.   

When Shaniyah was found Monday, it seemed like a happy ending.  Until it came out that Tiesha entrusted her child to someone whose full name and address she didn't even know.  And that she waited more than 24 hours to report the baby missing.

So the Department of Human Services placed Shaniyah in foster care temporarily while they investigate the family.  But maybe DHS already knows enough:  Shaniyah is Tiesha's seventh kid, and it turns out the other six are all in foster care.

Tiesha's mother, Ernestine Pitts-Rainey, said that Tiesha has "the mind of a 12-year-old," and suffers from emotional and developmental disorders.   

This revelation enraged many Philadelphians who had been rooting for Shaniyah's safe return - an anger reflected in comments on local websites covering the story:  "Why was this woman not stopped from procreating by her own parents . . . Norplant was a wonderful thing," wrote one reader. 

A fair question.  Shouldn't Tiesha's mother have put her on some kind of long-term birth control before she was 18, knowing what she knew about Tiesha's disabilities?  

Another reader stated, "The state of PA does have the right to make this young woman be sterilized because she is mentally challenged."  And although the thought of forced sterilization makes me queasy, I have to admit I can't think of a better solution in a case like this.  Tiesha is only 26.  If she continues to pop out babies at the current rate, she could easily have ten more children - kids whose safety might be comprised while under her care, and, should they be placed in foster homes, would face a terribly uncertain, difficult road.  Never mind the strain on already stretched public resources. 

 

Philadelphia Daily News photo

 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Cassie said:

Ah yes, the flip side of the right to choose.  Not always rosey is it?

June 20, 2008 5:17 PM
 

tiffer said:

I don't think that forcibly sterilizing people is the answer.  She is still a person!  Who knows what has already been done to try to get her to make her own decision about permanent birth control.  I'm no expert in this, but I've worked with adults like her.  Most of my clients did not have children, but I worked very hard with those who were sexually active to use birth control.  I wonder if she just needs more community/institutional support?  Oh wait, our awesome government loves to slash those programs.... I'm sure that sterilizing people with an IQ below a certain number would cost less.

June 21, 2008 7:38 AM
 

Eomaia said:

I've known women like this, who kept having babies and CPS just kept taking them away. They were never told straight up "Look, you are mentally disabled and are not capable of taking care of a baby. No matter how many babies you have, we will take every single baby from you. We can't tell you to get sterilized, so it's up to you."                         Instead, CPS keeps a close eye on them and finds something that can be exaggerated into a danger to the child, and then the case goes forward from there. The mother is left thinking that it all happened because she did something wrong, and that she can have another baby and do everything right and she'll be allowed to keep that baby.                    The movie "I am Sam" raised some important questions. I think some people with disabilities (mental or physical) are capable of doing some parenting, but need other people around for support. We could let mentally disabled or mentally ill women raise their own children while living in a group home for mothers with disabilities. It's easier to find people who want to raise a child as their own and not have to deal with the woman who bore that child, so instead of treating disabled women as mothers, we end up treating them as uteri to supply healthy babies for infertile couples.

June 22, 2008 12:34 AM

About Amy S.F. Lutz

Amy S.F. Lutz's work has appeared in dozens of literary journals, including Cream City Review, The American Poetry Review, Puerto del Sol, and Mid-American Review. She and her husband have five children. Amy and her sister chronicle their adventures in communal living in their blog whoelsewantstoliveinmyhouse.com

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage