Strollerderby

"30 Days" Not Long Enough to Change One Woman's Mind About Gay Parenting

Posted by Erin White

As an old writing teacher of mine used to say, just because something really happened doesn't mean it's a good story.  This pretty much sums up my feelings about reality TV, and is at least half the reason that the "Same-Sex Parenting" installment of Morgan Spurlock's 30 Days show sat on my DVR for nearly a week before I could bring myself to watch it.  

I was also afraid of how upset it would make me.  

The show follows Kati, an Orange County Mormon and adoptive mother of two, as she travels across the U.S. to a farmhouse outside Ann Arbor, Michigan where she has agreed to spend 30 days living with Tom, Dennis, and their four adopted children.  

Boy, is Kati ever nervous! How will the gays treat her?  Will they take it personally when she tells them that she thinks their children would be better off living on the streets than with them?  Will the lesbian mom she meets get defensive when Kati tells her she's truly sorry that she's been denied all contact with her child because she has no parental rights, but that she could have solved her own problem by not having a child in the first place?  

Suffice it to say, Kati does not form lasting friendships with Tom and Dennis.  She's angry and sad about this, and confused about why they can't just "agree to disagree."  (Tom points out that actively working to dismantle his relationship and family isn't just disagreeing with him.)

While it would be easy to make Kati the villian in this story (and I think I will just go ahead and do that), I also hold Spurlock accountable for much of what is offensive about this show.  While he gives airtime to Dawn Stefanowicz, author of Out From Under, and Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council, the only gay or lesbian individual he speaks with directly is the head of Pacific Reproductive Services, a sperm bank in San Fransciso.  And it's less of an interview and more of a Mr. Rogers-esque field trip during which Spurlock gets to make the obligatory straight man jokes about how great it would be to get paid for doing something he does anyway.  So original!  There is a whole boatload of research showing that children raised by gay and lesbian parents are happy, healthy, and well-adjusted.  But not one data point made its way into this show.  

 By the end of the show everyone is in tears and Kati is on her way back to California, relieved that her deeply stressful and lonely 30 days as the only homophobe in the land are over.  If this 30 Days experiment proves anything, it's that people's bigotry and prejudice can't be changed simply by getting to know a few good gays.  Real change of heart requires something a little closer to home. Which is why I'm praying that one of Kati's sons turns out to be gay.    

 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Birdieta said:

I wonder what it was like for the children of the gay couple to have that woman in their home?

June 29, 2008 3:32 PM
 

Rachael Brownell (Redsy) said:

Well-written, Erin and well-said.  The whole enterprise sounds horrid for everyone involved... hard to imagine Mr. Spurlock really hoped to change minds with this crap.

June 29, 2008 3:47 PM
 

steffmarcusky said:

Most of the 30 Days stuff does end up changing peoples's minds - maybe another person would have been open to understanding it, but they picked the wrong woman. However, I am very disappointed that the data didn't make it into the show - usually there is a lot of data interspersed within the "drama".

June 29, 2008 8:07 PM
 

Cassie said:

Very mean to hope her child grows up to be gay.  It is a hard way to live in this country and time.  Cruel comment.  Besides, Kati is entitled to her beliefs just liek we are.  Most of the worlds' religions view homosexuality as wrong.  Are we now saying those people are wrong to follow thier religious beliefs?  

June 29, 2008 9:12 PM
 

pqbon said:

Kati is fine to believe what ever wants. However, the point of the show was Kati was fighting against gay adoption. People voting against gay rights cross the line.

I've watched every 30days episode since it started airing. This was the first episode where things were the train wreck.

I think the reason they didn't bother with statics was the family involved made it clear that gay adoption is not a bad idea. They had former foster system kids testifing that they would have loved to be adopted by gay people. They had catholic family members testifying that they had reservations at first but after seeing the gay family raising kids had totally changed their minds.

June 30, 2008 1:26 AM
 

Erin White said:

Cassie, it is wrong for people to follow their religious beliefs when said beliefs move them to intentionally limit the civil and human rights of others.  If people believe that homosexuality is wrong, then they shouldn't enter into homosexual relationships.  

And being gay in this "country and time" isn't really so bad.  I'm actually having a great time.  

June 30, 2008 8:23 AM
 

Nicole said:

Well said Erin White, on all counts.

June 30, 2008 9:10 AM
 

Jessi said:

Kati is entitled to her opinion and her beliefs just like anyone else in this country.  As far as voting the way she believes and for what she believes in... she is also entitled to do that.  She can do, say or believe anything she wants as long as she is in the scope of the law.  

If the coin were flipped and a gay couple weren't allowed to march in a parade or a lesbian wasn't allowed to vote the way she believed... all hell would break loose.  

Just because we may not like the civil liberties she chooses, doesn't mean we have the right to stomp on them.

June 30, 2008 9:43 AM
 

Manjari said:

Cassie, It is not mean or cruel to wish that one of Katy's sons would turn out to be gay. It's not some horrible affliction. It would just be sad for the son to have such a narrow minded mother. And, yeah, in my opinion the people you are referring to are wrong for following their religious beliefs. Religion is too often an excuse for hurtful and unacceptable behavior.

Jessi, I don't know why it's still okay to discriminate against people based on sexual orientation. Just because our laws haven't quite caught up with common decency, doesn't mean that a person isn't a jerk for being bigoted. There are plenty of ways to be an awful person while remaining within the scope of the law.

June 30, 2008 11:29 AM
 

Rachael Brownell (Redsy) said:

I can't believe in this day and age people still have the sheer ignorance to express such total bigotry - Cassie, are you living under a rock somewhere?  In the end the gay couple in this show are much better parents than their ridiculously sheltered and ill informed mother.

June 30, 2008 11:45 AM
 

MomofBeans said:

Love is love. I have never understood why anyone would have a problem with love. If you haven't already, watch the documentary on Rosie O'Donnell's family cruise. I cried and cried...so many beautiful families and children and our country discriminates against them. I've seen Gay couples who have adopted babies and children from ALL walks of life...oftentimes kids that society has turned its back on. And they build a home, life, and family for them. They shower them with love, that they would have otherwise been deprived of. How is that wrong? Seriously, how can you actively campaign against that? This Kati woman is a wanker. You can dress it up in religion all you want, but God doesn't make ugly and she doesn't like ugly, either.

June 30, 2008 12:18 PM
 

Bunny said:

Who is proposing Kati's civil liberties be stomped? All I see is people saying that the opinions she has the full right to express are idiotic. Which they are.

June 30, 2008 2:25 PM
 

K said:

30 Days seemed like a good show at first but -- through no fault of its own -- it actually starts to get depressing, when you start to feel that absolutely nothing is ever going to change. Even when by day 15 or 20 the visitor has an epiphany... it's forgotten by a month after the experience.

Aside from the episodes Spurlock personally experiences, the best show was probably the previous "live among the gays" one. At the end, his mom asks with dumb-faced humor, "what do they do for work?" and he answers plainly "They have the same jobs that everyone else has", like a hammer of obvious simplicity whacking against the contrivances of ignorance.

Compare to the Mexican border patrol agent, who came out still working against illegal immigrants; the Islamophobe who still acted like there was a terrorist cell on every Dearborn block, the club-slut daughter who learns nothing from her mother's 30 day slosh fest.

No matter what dose of reality you hit people with these days, they still remain ignorant.

June 30, 2008 2:36 PM
 

pqbon said:

K, the Mexican border militia guy didn't go back to walk the boarder. He did go back at the end to tell his former compatriots he was leaving. IIRC He actually said at the end that he could no longer walk the border. His views definitely softened. He didn't do a 180 but change like that takes more then 30days.

June 30, 2008 7:34 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage