Strollerderby

What Does Bush Have Against Planned Pregnancies?

Although I am unequivocally pro-choice, I respect those who are peacefully opposed to abortion on moral grounds. But anyone who supports the Bush administration’s most recent attack on family planning is completely nuts as far as I’m concerned.

The administration has put forth a proposal to deny federal funding to any health programs, including schools and hospitals, that “discriminate against” providers who refuse to provide abortion or some types of birth control. To give you a feel for how this policy would affect women’s lives, the draft proposal, according to The New York Times, “expresses concern about state laws that require hospitals to provide emergency contraception to rape victims who request it.”

To that end, the Bush administration would like to make the definition of abortion much broader. According to the proposal, abortion should be redefined as anything “that results in the termination of the life of a human being in utero between conception and natural birth, whether before or after implantation.” 

That “before or after implantation” is crucial: it means that birth control pills and emergency contraception could be considered abortion—and that any clinic that thinks otherwise could lose federal funding.

Does anyone else feel like she’s in the Twilight Zone?

Photo: prochoice.org


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Larissa said:

AAAARRRRRGGGHHHH!!!!!

Why can't he just stop trying to do things and recognize his lame duck-ness for the rest of the year.  

July 16, 2008 5:22 PM
 

sumoo said:

Twilight Zone - that's exactly where I thought I was when I read this.  What is wrong with these people?!?!?!!?

July 16, 2008 5:25 PM
 

Manjari said:

My initial reaction to this was to wish that George W. had been aborted as a fetus, but that's just an awful thing to think. Instead, I wish his asshole parents could have raised him to be less evil and stupid.

July 16, 2008 10:16 PM
 

Nicole said:

I think it is time for rallies again.  Who is the government to tell me what I can and cannot do to my body.  Shouldn't condoms fall under that then?  I mean it prevents conception and implantation.  OMG those last statements probably are not coherent I am so angry!

July 17, 2008 1:42 AM
 

mistress_scorpio said:

Sexist policy at it's core. You'll notice that condoms are not on the list... only the types of birth control utilized by women.

July 17, 2008 7:09 AM
 

St said:

I'm totally opposed to abortion.  Birth control and "morning-after" options are NOT abortion.  I've used them and would fight for the rights of others to use them.

July 17, 2008 9:55 AM
 

km said:

These politicians are trying to destroy the middle class.  They want us to have more kids than we can afford to raise, probably while simultaneously cutting social services, setting the stage for a huge downward spiral of poverty.  The rich get rich, the poor get poorer.  

This administration is totally trying to screw us.  

July 17, 2008 7:42 PM

About Hannah Tennant-Moore

Hannah Tennant-Moore is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer whose work has appeared or is forthcoming in Best Buddhist Writing (2008); The Sun; Guantanamo: Inside the Prison, Outside the Law; Tricycle; Turning Wheel (as the winner of the Young Writers Award); and elsewhere.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage