Strollerderby

Kid Food Is Mostly Crap, and It's a Little Shocking

Posted by Kelly Mills
barbie cereal

I doubt most parents would assume a box of waffles with a picture of SpongeBob on the front was necessarily health food. But what if the box also had a label saying, "high in essential nutrients for growing kids"? Even if you don't consciously think about it, you might soften in your approach to the waffles. Well, I got news for you: That food is most likely junk.

See, researchers in Canada analyzed more than 360 products marketed to children. They did NOT include junk food, so there's nowhere to run to, nowhere to hide on this study. Instead they covered what is sometimes packaged as "fun food", products with cartoon characters and so on pimping the contents, such as prepackaged dinners. And guess what? Nearly 90 percent did not meet established nutritional standards, measured by percent of calories from fat, and the amount of sugar and/or sodium. Worse still in my book, 62 percent of the foods researchers identified as being of poor nutritional quality had claims of health on the packaging, like "low fat" or containing "essential nutrients". 

So yes, the food industry is not above using shady marketing (such as pictures of kids playing sports on a box of sugar-salt crack) to fool parents about the health value of foods. And of course, there's the issue of directly marketing to kids, by putting appealing and familiar characters on the packaging. Just be forewarned that the fun, convenient food you buy at your kid's request is highly likely to be straight-up junk.

Related:

Tyson Foods Big Fat Liars

Locally Grown Ain't All That 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Me said:

Sorry, but DUH.  A study was needed for this??  REALLY??

July 23, 2008 3:12 PM
 

Sheri said:

That is why it is important to actually read the nutrition facts on the side of the box.  

And I'm agreeing with Me....

Although I have been guilty of buying my kids a box or two of Spongebob cereal or fruit snacks, everything in moderation.

July 23, 2008 7:37 PM
 

Starlyn said:

For the most part children will eat good food if put in front of them. When they are not used to getting it, it might take awhile. My children liked eating cut up fruits and veggies. Just take the time, it doesn't take that much and the benifits are worth the time taken.

July 23, 2008 7:54 PM
 

Brett Singer said:

I'm looking at a box of Frosted Mini Wheats that says "Clinically shown to improve kids' attentiveness by nearly 20%"

Clearly it's a replacement for Ritalin.

July 23, 2008 9:42 PM
 

Manjari said:

It's not shocking.

July 24, 2008 8:56 AM
 

Maeby said:

@Brett  hah! if big pharma thought for a second that a cereal could replace something as wonderful to them as ritalin, there would be no more cereal in the world!

(personally i always have honey nut shredded wheat around these parts, yum)

July 24, 2008 9:55 AM
 

Kelly Mills said:

I know I'm a dork, but actually was surprised that the number of nutritionally ick foods was almost 90 percent. I mean, that's HUGE. I'm with Sheri on the moderation thing, but the number of foods that just became "treat" foods got higher after this.

July 24, 2008 10:23 AM
 

Mike Adamick (Cry It Out!) said:

Everything in moderation except Barbie Pop Tarts, that is. Those things are delicious and a part of a balanced breakfast ...

July 24, 2008 10:46 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage