Strollerderby

Political Nanny: Bush Bans Officials From Today's Obama Rally

Posted by Madeline Holler

That First Amendment of the Constitution and its freedom to assemble. What a load! Thankfully, George W. Bush and the State Department's Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy get it. They've banned all state department officials from attending Democratic candidate Barack Obama's speech tonight in Berlin.

You know, wouldn't want the citizens of Germany to think American officials are engaged in partisan political activities. Just THINK of what that would do to the reputation of the U.S.

Now, in fairness, "partisan political activity" is prohibited under the department's regulations for overseas service. But a columnist at HuffPo points out this is a rather strict interpretation of this regulation. Even Kennedy would agree with that. 

From the Washington Post:

In the interview, Kennedy described the regulation as "a standing policy," although he acknowledged that "I don't believe we've ever had to interpret this before. None of us thinking about this could come up with a precedent" for the Obama campaign rally.

What do you think? Expected? Fair? Giving you that creepy "this is what it must have felt like in East Germany in the 70s"?

 

Photo: salon.com


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Dad said:

I get your point, but still... you really shouldn't bring up to US Constitution when talking about something taking place in another country...

July 24, 2008 8:16 PM
 

Celina said:

Well, yes she should. These are American citizens with the right to vote. They also represent us. So it is a question of when your job stops and your personal life begins.

Used to be that diplomats had a space on their personnel review that said "wife" and the wife's behavior was part of the review.

Diplomats handle these sorts of questions all the time. They still have jobs, no matter who is in power in our country. And they still have personal opinions about those in charge. They do have to be careful how they voice those opinions, because of their jobs.

July 25, 2008 11:08 AM
 

Dad said:

Exactly. I said I understood the point. But the fact that what our Constitution says has little or no meaning in terms of the laws of another country...

July 25, 2008 11:49 AM
 

Celina said:

So, do you think they should go? The US Constitution says they should be able to. I have no idea what the German Constitution says. Their employer is the US government. Shouldn't it be governed by its own Constitution? Would the German Constitution be able to dictate what the US government does? Technically, diplomats are on their own soil, so they have immunity from laws of the country they live in unless they've done something really awful.

July 25, 2008 2:03 PM
 

Dad said:

personally, I think they should be allowed to go. but I also think the constitution has nothing to do with the issue.

ps - the embassy is US soil, not the ground the diplomats occupy. the rally took place on German soil. you are thinking of dimplomatic immunity, which, yes, protects diplomats from prosecution under the host country's laws.

July 25, 2008 3:26 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage