Strollerderby

They Say: Babies Need More Tummy Time

Posted by Jen Chaney

Sometimes it seems like we parents can't do anything right. First the "Back to Sleep" campaign urged us to make sure our babies sleep on their backs to avoid the risks of SIDS. So we dutifully followed those instructions and methodically laid down our little ones facing upwards instead of down. Which was, and remains, the right thing to do. 

But it turns out all that "Back to Sleep" stuff has made us less diligent about ensuring that our children spend time on their tummies during the day. The American Physical Therapy Association reports that therapists have noticed an increase in motor delays among infants during the past six years. The No. 1 cause: Not enough tummy time. The APTA also notes that in recent years, care centers and providers have cited a whopping 600 percent increase in referrals for misshapen heads, another side effect of a lack of on-the-belly QT.

Judy Towne Jennings, an APTA spokeswoman, told Marketwatch that, "Ideally, babies should be placed on their tummies after every nap, diaper change and feeding, starting with 1-2 minutes."

Now, all of this probably doesn't come as much of a surprise to anyone who recently dealt with a newborn. (Yeah, my son only wanted to turn his head a certain direction. As a result, I feared he would turn into a Conehead. Thankfully, he did not.) We know that making sure the kids sleep on their backs is important. We also know that tummy time is, too. Which is why, at the end of the day, we sometimes feel like we're flipping our babies around like cute, little sizzling omelets on the frying pan of life. Or something.

The APTA's information is helpful, for sure. And all we can do as parents is try our best to take it to heart without turning into rampaging, infant-flopping, baby-head-twisting psychopaths. I've met people like that. And let me tell ya, they're not pleasant. 

Image: iparenting.com


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Alisa said:

I feel like some of the guilt some parents I know feel as well as attachment parenting can make parents feel bad for letting their child seem even the least bit uncomfortable or frustrated.

I realized after a certain point that the only way my daughter would be motivated enough to work through a issue is if she got frustrated. So if she kvetched and made her displeasure known while on her tummy that was alright. And now, learning to crawl. She hates it and gets so frustrated that she can't move forward, but at the same time, the minute we put her down on the floor, she flips immediately onto her tummy and starts trying to coordinate those limbs.

August 6, 2008 6:40 PM
 

Fuschiafinn said:

"...flipping our babies around like cute, little sizzling omelets on the frying pan of life..."

*giggle*

August 7, 2008 12:18 AM
 

Bethie said:

I try not to put my baby flat on his back too much, I hold him a lot.  He HATES tummy time, so I am not doing it as much as I should, I'm sure.  I guess I will have to just keep doing it anyway *sigh*.

August 7, 2008 1:18 AM
 

Courtney said:

I agree about the frustration thing...if I put my son down on his back, the first thing he does is flip to his tummy.  But then he immediately complains about being stuck on his tummy.  He wants to be scooting along the floor, but just hasn't quite gotten it together yet.  

The hard thing is knowing how frustrated to let him get.  I try to leave him as long as I can, but eventually he just loses it and starts randomly flailing.  At that point it seems counter-poductive, so we find something else to do.

I wonder, though, how problematic it really is if babies are learning to crawl a little later.  As long as they are getting attention and stimulation, does it really matter if jr. crawls at 5 months instead of 7 months?  Or 9 months?

August 7, 2008 9:16 AM
 

M said:

I'm with Courtney.  What does "developmental delay" mean, anyway?  If all we mean is that kids crawl a bit later now than a couple of decades ago, is that necessarily a bad thing?

We didn't sweat the tummy time thing too much- if he felt like it, great, and if he didn't, fine.  When our kiddo was ready to crawl (read: frustrated that he couldn't get into things on his own), he did.  I guess it was easy to wait for him to decide to do it on his own, because he did so pretty early, but I can't imagine that it would have hurt him to wait a couple of months if that had been more his style.

August 7, 2008 12:22 PM
 

LogicalMama said:

Delayed motor skills???? We are pushing our little ones a lot sooner, what with No Child Left Behind! Kindergarten is academic, many preschools are academic! These kids are expected to hone their fine motor skills a whole lot sooner than before.... maybe THAT'S the problem!

August 7, 2008 5:08 PM
 

Ella said:

I think late crawling is great. My boy didn't crawl until 10 months, so I had lots of time to not have to chase him.

And a baby exercises the SAME muscles when you hold him with his tiny bobbly head peeking over your shoulder. Problem  (as if) solved!

August 8, 2008 7:46 PM
 

Tom said:

The medical reason pacifiers and back sleep seem to reduce the rate of SIDS is because some children are believed to have a brainstem defect which does not allow them to awaken from Stage 3 and 4 NREM Sleep. But, scientists can't predict which infants have this defect so all parents are told to put their babies on their backs to sleep and are often recommended to give their infants pacifiers. But, Stage 3 and 4 NREM sleep is also when it is believed that temporary memories an infant makes during the day are transferred for permanent storage in the neocortex.  Increased tummy time will not decrease impact of no Stage 3 or 4 NREM Sleep.

Infants who sleep on their backs compared to infants who sleep on their stomachs have a higher risks of negative side effects:

- Social skills delays at 6 months (Dewey, Fleming, et al, 1998)

- Motor skills delays at 6 months (Dewey, Fleming, et al, 1998)

- Milestone delays (Davis, Moon, et al., 1998)

tummysleepcentral.blogspot.com

August 9, 2008 8:59 AM

About Jen Chaney

Jen Chaney is the movies editor and a DVD columnist for washingtonpost.com. Her byline has appeared in The Washington Post, People magazine, USA Today and the Utne Reader as well as various other newspapers around the country. She is the mother of a one-year-old boy, who has not yet learned the word Xanadu. But he will. Trust us, he will.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage