Strollerderby

Ruling: Docs Must Impregnate Lesbians and Singles, Too

Posted by Madeline Holler

The California Supreme Court has ruled that fertility clinics may not turn away clients based on their sexual orientation or marital status. Yes, that's even if the doctors claim helping lesbians or singles become mothers is against their religion. Hallelujah!

What's incredible to me is that doctors turned away paying customers in the first place. But with the baby-making business booming, perhaps there was some wiggle room in the bottom line for bigotry.

The suit was brought against a clinic in California in 2005. Doctors told Guadalupe Benitez that they refused to inseminate her with donor sperm, first because she is gay and then later because she was unmarried. The doctors said they were exercising their freedom of religion in turning her away.

The ruling says anti-discrimination laws take precedence over doctors' right to religious freedom. Amen!

Now the question is, will those docs get out of the business, you know, on religious grounds? I doubt it, too, I doubt it, too.

What's your take? 

 

Photo: LA Times 

 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

feefifoto said:

As a single mother by choice, although not gay, I ran into this exact issue when I needed to look for fertility treatments.  A Catholic hospital told me they wouldn't work with me because I wasn't married but if I'd been in a "committed relationship" they would have helped me.  I didn't bother to point out their hypocrisy -- I just went to a more liberal medical practice and they were great.

An additional insult -- I was undergoing fertility treatments, for which insurance paid NOTHING, at the exact time that Viagra, which was covered by insurance, came out.

August 19, 2008 2:37 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage