Strollerderby

Couple Sues After Failed Vasectomy

What would your first assumption be if your wife got pregnant after you’d had a vasectomy? Would you suspect her of being unfaithful—or your sperm of outsmarting your sterilization surgery?

Well, unless your marriage is on the rocks or you’re swingers (and, hey, I don’t judge!), the latter is the more likely. At least 1 percent of vasectomies fail to prevent pregnancy—just as condoms break and women on the pill get pregnant.

Mindy and Brady Hill of Arkansas found out what it was like to be that one percent (as, presumably, have thousands of other couples), and they didn’t like it one bit. They claim that doctors suggested that Mindy had been unfaithful, which put stress on their marriage. After Mindy miscarried, a paternity test showed that there was a 99.999 percent chance that the baby was Brady’s. No doubt this whole ordeal was highly stressful and unpleasant. Still, one would hope that Brady trusted Mindy enough that a paternity test wasn’t necessary to make him believe that the baby was his. But, of course, a paternity test will come in handy in court.

Mindy and Brady are suing for negligence and defamation. Should they win?

Photo: Shaadi Times

Related Post:

Should 21-Year-Olds Get Vasectomies?


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

crysbellis said:

Hmmm, depends on the whole story, and whether Brady requested a paternity test or not.  If the doctors did actually insinuate that Mindy had been unfaithful, that's at the very least schmucky behavior, and could be legally construed as defamation - after all, the legal criteria for def states that if someone's livelihood or personal reputation have been damaged, they have a case.  But I'm not sure about the 'negligence' part - as you said, no form of preventing conception is 100 percent, and the Hills should have known or been informed of the - admittedly scance - possibility.  

September 10, 2008 8:41 PM
 

jeanne said:

We had my husband "fixed" (I just love saying that), and not only do they warn you that there can still be some active swimmers in there, they expect you to go through several "donations" before they'll call it a successful operation. So it depends on whether Mr. Hill followed doctor's orders.

September 10, 2008 9:16 PM
 

Lisa said:

Yeah I know a couple who were surprised by a pregnancy post-vasectomy.  As my friend will tell you -- the swimmer count has to be ZERO.  A low count still means you can get pregnant.  All you need is one little guy.  

September 10, 2008 9:38 PM
 

leahsmom said:

@crysbellis  - you raise a good point (echoed by others), that is part of whether or not the docs were negligent. If they fully informed the couple that it doesn't work all the time, and so they needed to choose whether to use additional forms of b.c., I think negligence is hard to claim (unless the reason the vasectomy didn't work was because of an unreasonable error by the doc) - but if they didn't, perhaps it should be s.o.p. for this procedure, and build a stronger case on the negligence claim?

September 11, 2008 8:54 AM
 

Bunny said:

Geez, just imagine being that kid - "Mommy and Daddy didn't want you so much they SUED because you were born." Yikes.

September 11, 2008 5:17 PM
 

mindy said:

Of course the  media has only picked out parts of our case.  Of course we know that vasectomies are not fullproof.   If you read our case in it's entirety, many steps along the way were mishandled.   We already have 3 beautiful children ages 19, 17, and 7.  I was 41 at the time, and upon our huge "surprise", we did come around to embracing the idea of another child.  The pregnancy resulted in miscarraige, and I insisted on the paternity test from the d&c because we had been treated with such disrespect by the clinic's insinuations about my fidelity.  Our negligence points in our case involve post op instructions not being up to industry standards - dr. only required 10 ejaculations and one test, which my husband followed as directed.  Also, there is doubt as to whether the clinic handled the "sample" properly, or tested it at all, as there was nothing but a handwritten "all clear" on a notebook piece of paper in Brady's medical file.  Thank you for all of your comments, but remember, there are more details in the actual case and my hope through all of this is that it doesn't happen to someone else.

September 12, 2008 10:50 AM
 

Brandy said:

Yep, calling Mindy a cheater is per se defamation depending on the jurisdiction. Absolutely she should win!

September 12, 2008 7:24 PM

About Hannah Tennant-Moore

Hannah Tennant-Moore is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer whose work has appeared or is forthcoming in Best Buddhist Writing (2008); The Sun; Guantanamo: Inside the Prison, Outside the Law; Tricycle; Turning Wheel (as the winner of the Young Writers Award); and elsewhere.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage