Strollerderby

Abortion Blogger Gives Liberal Parents a Bad Name

The popular new blog “What to Expect When You’re Aborting” may be the worst thing that’s happened to the choice movement since Sarah Palin. And, in a shout-out that promises to make anti-choice Republicans proud, the writer thanks her “lefty parents” for forming her beliefs.

The anonymous blogger is an anti-choice caricature of the kind of woman who would choose to have an abortion. She is a financially stable white woman in her early twenties; she has been on the pill since she was 13, though she has been "pretty f***ing lax" about it; she glorifies alcohol consumption (beginning her description of the day of her abortion with the headline, “Let’s get some cocktails and de-brief, shall we?”); and she takes glee in parading her hatred for all religion. I don’t have a problem with any of these things in and of themselves—I just don’t want this young woman to be the spokesperson for reproductive rights.

When the blogger sees her fetus, which she refers to as “Tumor,” in a sonogram, she writes, “This was not my Juno moment, where all of a sudden I bit my lower lip and recognized the ‘life’ inside of me. If I could have I would have ripped the f***ing thing our [sic] with my bear [sic] hands on the spot.” She is only concerned that the “tumor’s freakshow head” will mean she’ll be in more pain during the procedure.

The way a woman reacts to a pregnancy is entirely personal: she may feel nothing but relief to have an abortion, or she may decide, at 16, to become a mother. But I don’t want to hear a callous woman broadcasting her hatred of her fetus as an example of why reproductive rights are important, any more than I want to hear an evangelical teenage mom self-righteously defend her choice as heroic or moral.

This blogger, not surprisingly, minces no words in expressing her rather juvenile hatred for the “culture warriors.” She’s got no time for intelligently discussing policy issues (though she does occasionally include a meaningful quote from more nuanced thinkers); she just loathes the bastards and she takes joy in making that perfectly clear, entirely unaware that she is only giving anti-choice activists lots of grist for the self-righteous hatred mill.

This blog epitomizes my concern about the attitude amongst young people that it’s cool not to care too much about anything. If this is what teenage girls stumble upon on the Internet as they try to navigate the very difficult questions surrounding sex and relationships, parents need to work doubly hard to raise thoughtful, intelligent young women.

Photo: What to Expect When You're Aborting


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

ticktock said:

Looks like it might be a parody blog... only from a right wing pro-lifer trying to make a point.  

September 18, 2008 6:30 PM
 

Hannah Tennant-Moore said:

It's definitely not meant to be a parody.  I did have the thought that it could be a fake blog written by an anti-choice activist. Still, I became concerned when I read that Jezebel, the progressive women's issues site that I normally love, was praising the blog as funny, honest, and much needed.

September 18, 2008 6:43 PM
 

Alice said:

I agree with Ticktock. It is a Right wing parody.  This is how they think white, liberal women think.  

September 18, 2008 6:44 PM
 

rrr said:

Wow, I've been reading the blog you're talking about since her first post and I've enjoyed it wholeheartedly. I think this kind of honest voice will be really helpful to young women looking for information on abortions. There are a million sites offering earnest, well-meaning lectures of both the left-wing and right-wing variety but their tone of voice often rings hollow to women in their teens and twenties.

Now here is a young woman blogging about her experience for her peers in a way that they can relate to, and you want her to tone it down so as not to give anti-choicers ammunition?  They are already set in their beliefs and beyond the point of reason or dialogue so why should this blogger change what she's saying because of them?

Stop with the tutting and looking down your nose at this woman. Choice means that every woman has a right to have an abortion, but also the right to say how they feel about their abortions whether or not you approve of their attitude.

September 18, 2008 7:10 PM
 

Dwtintx said:

I have to say that I am appalled by this.  I am definitely pro choice, and you are right that everyone is entitled to the way they feel about an unwanted pregnancy and how they feel about an abortion.  Abortion should be legal and remain a choice open to everyone.  What shocks me here is the absolute callousness, the disdain for the fact that it is a life she is taking.  We can argue about whether a small ball of dividing cells is life, but let's be real- those of you who are parents know that at 8 weeks gestation, it looks like a baby in there, and it moves around and is very much alive.  I don't think she should feel bad for doing it, but at least be respectful.  That fetus deserved to be acknowledged as a living thing, and treated with some kind of respect, even if the ultimate choice was to end that life.

If this person feels such disgust and disdain for a life she created, just because it hasn't been born, why should I believe she has any concern for any living thing?  Why would she respect you or me, or anyone except herself?  I don't think abortion is necessarily wrong, but I certainly don't think it should be celebrated, and the fetus shouldn't be treated with such disgust.  It was a living creature that she created.  She should have the decency to respect that.

And rrr, your attitude combined with that of the blogger's make me seriously concerned for the young women you speak of who relate better to this woman than to those who are earnest in their discussion of choices.  Abortion is (or should be) an earnest decision; it should not be something undertaken casually or glibly.  That is one stereotype the conservative side likes to flog, and this blogger personifies it.  It worries me greatly that you see nothing wrong with how she abdicated all sexual responsibility, and then has such a disturbing reaction to a life that she had a hand in creating.  Despite all my talk of a living being, that I am pro choice; I'm no anti-choice person sock puppeting.  But let's all be responsible enough to face up to the fact that abortion does end a possibly viable life, and be grown up enough to respect that.

September 18, 2008 10:46 PM
 

Knitty said:

I'm with rrr.  I haven't read any of the blog and doubt I will, but I see no reason why anyone should censor themselves in fear of what the right-wing wingnuts will squeal about.  They're always going to find something to fake moral outrage over, and if they can't find something to fit the bill, they wouldn't hesitate to manufacture such a website.

The beauty of the Internet is that all voices can be heard, not just the ones that make their way into our corporate media.  

September 18, 2008 11:01 PM
 

Larissa said:

Perhaps if this blogger were reflecting on a past experience, we could expect tempered, sage insights about her experiences, a balanced and thoughtful perspective.  However, she's not reflecting, she's blogging a live and actual experience, one that is hard and messy and brings up strong feelings.  I don't think her anger at her fetus is out of place at all, if she doesn't want to be pregnant, it seems like an honest reaction and I don't think it makes her any more likely to kick a puppy or disrespect the life of other humans.  I do think she alludes to relationships in her life that have been effected by her pregnancy & decision to abort.  Her instructions to young men about their role when a sexual partner wants to terminate a pregnancy come from a strong women's autonomy & human rights perspective.  I have been reading the blog and do wonder if it might be a parody or fiction, but I don't think we'll ever know.  But she's got everyone talking, doesn't she?

September 19, 2008 2:28 AM
 

Dwtintx said:

I don't have a problem with her being angry at her pregnancy or her fetus, or with her expression of that.  What I have a problem with is that she seems to have no concept that pregnancy is a big deal, and that terminating a pregnancy should also be a big deal, because it's a potential human and a living thing you're talking about.  Be angry all you want, I'm sure I would be too if I had ever had an unintended pregnancy.  But have some respect for the other life involved- that of the fetus- even if you choose to terminate.  I think what bothers me so much is that she has no regard whatsoever for the momentousness of a pregnancy and what it means to terminate a pregnancy.  And that kind of callous disregard for the potential human whose life she is taking makes her the worst possible voice for the pro-choice movement.

I agree that she should be able to voice whatever she likes, but if she is going to be public with her comments, she needs to be prepared for criticism.  I don't think anyone here suggests that she should be shut down or censored, but only that she is a terrible voice for people who support reproductive freedoms.  I think the worst possible criticism of the pro choice perspective is that it doesn't take the significance of abortion seriously, and this woman completely personifies that criticism.

September 19, 2008 8:05 AM
 

Sally said:

Wow. So, let me get this straight, you have a beef with right-wingers portraying women who seek abortions as free-wheeling lefties who drink and callously toss their fetuses in the garbage. But the moment a woman decides to honestly talk about her feelings (and maybe use a bit of dark humor to deal with her situation), you portray her as a free-wheeling lefty who drinks too much and callously tosses her fetus in the garbage. Pot, meet kettle.

September 19, 2008 8:33 AM
 

rrr said:

Sally, I couldn't have said it better!

September 19, 2008 11:12 AM
 

notconvinced said:

I also agree that she's a terrible voice for reproductive freedoms. Obviously, she has the right to express herself as she sees fit, but I find her thoughts disturbing and juvenile in the extreme. Thankfully, she's not going to be a mother any time soon.

September 19, 2008 12:31 PM
 

Dwtintx said:

Sally, I'm not sure if your comment was directed at me or at the post generally, but I'm not portraying her as anything.  She's portraying herself.  And if she has any deep feelings whatsoever about her "Tumor" beyond "Eww, get it out, get it out!", she's not displayed them so far as I can read.  

Again, I don't have a problem with anger or her expression of it.  I don't have a problem with her honesty.  But I think it is undeniable that she gives pro-choice women a very bad voice.  She is who the religious right will point to when they level the charge that women use abortions as birth control and don't take seriously the fact that a life is ended when an abortion is performed.  Because I've seen no acknowledgement or comprehension of that fact in the blogger's writing whatsoever.  And on a personal level, I find that lack of acknowledgement or comprehension disturbing.

September 19, 2008 1:03 PM
 

notconvinced said:

Interesting. So you're saying it's a parody blog? That was my first thought (hence the name "notconvinced") but I was giving it the benefit of the doubt. Is there confirmation somewhere? I'm curious to read her rationale behind it.

September 20, 2008 12:30 AM

About Hannah Tennant-Moore

Hannah Tennant-Moore is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer whose work has appeared or is forthcoming in Best Buddhist Writing (2008); The Sun; Guantanamo: Inside the Prison, Outside the Law; Tricycle; Turning Wheel (as the winner of the Young Writers Award); and elsewhere.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage