Strollerderby

Disney trying to revive The Muppets

Posted by Brett Singer

Disney is trying to return The Muppets to their former glory. Or at least make some money off of them.I was going to title this post, "Disney doing everything they can to screw up the Muppets." But that was too long.

The New York Times reports on the fact that Disney is attempting to bring the Muppet "brand back from the dead," as "youth marketing expert" Samantha Skey puts it. ("Youth Marketing Expert" is code for "Spawn of Satan", but that's another topic.)

Eventually, odds are that the Disney Marketing Machine (another term that, loosely translated, means "Spawn of Satan") will succeed in cramming the classic characters down the gullets of children everywhere.  This is the company that made Miley Ray Hannah Montana Stewart Cyrus Lipschitz (one of those names is fake – guess which!) one of the most successful stars of all time.  They've even managed to convince kids that "High School Musical" is something other than awful.  So the task of getting that audience to like something that is actually good shouldn't be too tough, right?

The thing is, despite our warm memories of all things Muppet, not every enterprise Kermit and Co. have been involved in has been a success, especially after Papa Henson passed away. "Muppets Tonight" (not mentioned in the Times article) was a flop, not because of bad marketing, but because the show wasn't very good. (I liked it a little bit, but mostly for nostalgia reasons.) And Disney has been trying to get the characters into the Disney machine for some time and so far it hasn't worked out.

Bottom line: since so many parents love them some Miss Piggy, once they see her, they'll want their kids to love her too. So if Disney can manage to put the Pig and her friends in places where both the parents and the kids can see them, they will probably succeed in getting a return on their investment. It doesn't take a marketing genius to figure that out.

Here's the thing about The Muppets. At their best, they are fully realized characters, despite the fact that they are not actually alive. Charles Grodin told a story once that went something like this: when he was filming "The Great Muppet Caper", he turned to Miss Piggy (played by Frank Oz) between takes. He told "her" that he wanted to try the upcoming scene a different way. After a long pause, Oz/Piggy replied (in character, while not being filmed), "Well, I don't really see it that way, but if you want to I guess we can try it." Why tell that story? Because that's what made the Muppets great. Not the green felt, or even Miss Piggy karate chopping anyone who had eyes for her beloved Kermie. It's the characters and the people who played them. To think that you can just pluck Fozzie Bear and the rest into another situation and assume that everyone will have the same positive feelings about them as before is kind of silly.

On a slightly different tack, does it bother you that Disney is taking these characters we grew up with and turning them into shills for generic Disney product?

Source/image: NYTimes

Read more:

The Babble List: 25 Great Children's TV Shows That Aren't On DVD

Enormous baby sculpture

Disturbing Origins of 5 Nursery Rhymes

Naked Harry Potter pics hit the web

Grand Theft Auto player saves family

Awww…a baby otter…

One that didn’t make the list – Run Joe Run



+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

MomofBeans said:

I loved the original muppets! The Muppet Show was my favorite when I was a kid. I can still watch them now and laugh. My favorite number was called "A Real Live Burlesque Show" and was performed by those two little old guys (Statler and Waldorf?).

September 25, 2008 6:59 AM
 

Kris said:

I'm looking at a Beaker doll in my office right now. =)

The article is slightly misleading in discussing the upcoming movie. It says that some studio exec hired Jason Segel to write the movie, when the way he tells it he pitched the idea to them.

September 25, 2008 11:03 AM
 

Whit Honea said:

They will be fine.  Disney has had control of the Muppets for awhile and I'm glad they didn't immediately abuse the situation with an onslaught of crap. The new campaign they've started (check out the many videos on YouTube) is true to Muppet form.

September 25, 2008 11:54 AM
 

Dad said:

"It's the characters and the people who played them"

but... it will be the same characters, and the same people (Jim Henson, aside) that will be playing them...

Of course, you can't seem like a hipster parent without bashing Disney, even before seeing the product (which, as Whit points out, has been out for a while, not that you appear to have attempted to research it), so we forgive you Brett.

September 26, 2008 3:42 PM
 

Brett Singer said:

"but... it will be the same characters, and the same people (Jim Henson, aside) that will be playing them..."

Actually, that's incorrect. For example, Frank Oz still plays Miss Piggy but not exclusively:

www.imdb.com/.../ch0000531

There is definitely a nice amount of consistency with the muppeteers (or whatever they're called) but saying "it's the same people" is inaccurate. My main point is that Disney is simply trying to make money off of a property - which is what they do but that doesn't mean it will work every time. Disney actually tried this before with, I believe, a Macy's ad campaign that flopped miserably.

We'll get to your accusation of hipsterism some other time...

September 26, 2008 6:05 PM

About Brett Singer

Brett Singer is a writer and father living in Manhattan with his wonderful wife and two terrific sons (referred to here as Thing 1 and Thing 2). He writes about music for the Boston Phoenix, parenting for Babble and daddytips.com, and other topics for anyone else who will have him.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage