Strollerderby

Mom Bites Kid, Mom Goes to Jail

Posted by JeanneSager

No wonder our kids are so miserable to be around when they’re teething – those suckers are sharp. And no one knows it better than us – their parents. Because they like to bite US.

 

But if you’ve ever considered sinking your teeth into a chubby little hand to show them just what it feels like, listen up: A 28-year-old mom in England was sentenced to five months in jail this week. Her crime? She bit her 5-year-old.

 

The mom, whose name has not been released to the British press, said the little boy hurt his 8-month-old sister, and she sank her teeth into his arm. Although the bites did not break the skin, she did leave bruises. When the boy appeared at school with mouth-sized welts on his arms, staff called police.

 

Judge Mark Horton took issue with the fact that the mother acted in a “vengeful” manner toward her child, enacting revenge for what she thought the little boy had done to his sister. “There can be few offences (sic) more likely to cause anger and desire for retribution from the public than a case of a parent who maliciously and without cause assaults her own child. The fact you did so by biting, not simply striking this child, only inflames the circumstances of this offence.

 

“It can only be seen as a desire to cause the child pain by way of revenge which caused the bite,” he continued.

 

What I have trouble with is his assertion that biting a child is somehow worse than striking them. I’ve never been a big fan of corporal punishment, in part because I know my own limits. When I see red, I walk away so I don’t step over that line out of pure rage. But I don’t fault a parent who decides it’s worth a smack on the hand when a child gets near a hot oven, or a tap on the tush when a child continuously puts him or herself in danger.

 

But is biting crossing the line? Is using your mouth and not breaking the skin worse than taking a hairbrush or wooden spoon to a child’s hind end? I find it hard to believe that a mom or dad who spanks a child with a switch doesn’t “intend to cause the child pain.”

 

By the way, if you’ve ever considered biting after seeing stars when your 2-year-old took yet another chunk out of your hand, have heart. It’s a pretty normal reaction. And sometimes, kids need to know that what they’re doing hurts someone else. Which is why I don’t have a lot of sympathy when another kid bites my daughter on the playground. Now you know what it feels like, honey.

 

Source: The Evening Standard

Image: LabGP & SigOther

Related Posts:

Texas Judge Orders Woman to Stop Bearing Children

Dad Dumps Nine Kids Under Nebraska Safe Haven Law

For Dad: How to Beat Up Your Daughter's Boyfriend and Not Get Caught

When They Can Curse in Context

How to Annoy Your Sister: Advertise on Craigslist

When is Too Young to Teach Them 911?

Can a Mom be 'Too Dumb' to Parent?


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Manjari said:

I can't believe she bit her own kid! Maybe she went into some kind of crazy protective mode about her baby? I used to say (when I was childless) that I couldn't understand how anyone could ever hurt a child. Now I DO understand, because there are times when I feel like giving one of mine a smack. I don't actually do it, though! I think physical pain is the worst discipline idea, and I know I would feel so guilty later. Hitting, biting, etc. are all things we don't want our kids to do, so it seems obvious that we shouldn't get violent either.

September 26, 2008 8:56 AM
 

another_mom said:

My 2 1/2 year old son used to bite his 1 year old brother (as well as my husband and I).  One afternoon a few months ago, after a particular heinous bite of his brother, I bit him.  Not hard enough to bruise or leave lasting teeth marks, but enough so he could feel it.  And guess what?  He's never bitten since.  Was it revenge? No. Crazy protective mode? No. Moment of uncontrollable rage? No. It was calculated effective discipline.

September 26, 2008 9:36 AM
 

anon. said:

I have bitten both my children, when nothing else worked, as a way to show them how much it hurts.  I didn't think I was abusing them, I thought I was teaching them empathy.  I didn't just bite them as a reaction, I actually explained to them that "this is how it feels when someone bites you."  I know a lot of people would flame me with responses like how I might hit them back if they hit me, etc.  I can only go with what I think is right at the time.  Parenting is such a slippery slope.  It doesn't sound like they took into account the whole situation or what kind of mother she is in general.  What a shame!  And for the record, biting back only worked on one of my two children.  I stopped doing it to my second child when it proved not to be effective.  Maybe it was bad judgment, which I think EVERY parent is guilty of at some point, but my intentions were true and I was also going on the advice of some other parents who told me to try this method when I was at my wits end.  Under these circumstances I think a lot of good parents would be put in jail, myself included.

September 26, 2008 10:52 AM
 

Knitty said:

I don't see any difference between biting (that doesn't break the skin) and spanking other than one is considered socially acceptable and the other sounds primitive and animalistic.

I know mothers who have bitten their kids to teach them that biting hurts, and they report a 100 percent success rate.  As my grandmother used to put it "them's that don't hear have gots to feel!'

September 26, 2008 1:04 PM
 

Manjari said:

Yes, but this mom's bite was hard enough to leave bruises. Can anyone really defend that?

September 26, 2008 2:09 PM
 

christa said:

My parents used this technique when I went through a biting phase as a toddler (didn't work.  I just started biting myself after I bit someone.  smart kid).  Probably not the best idea, but five MONTHS in jail??  That sounds excessive.  How does that happen when elsewhere in the UK an 8 month old baby died from broken ribs AFTER a doctor said that his many other previous injuries were indicative of abuse, but the court refused to act?  www.timesonline.co.uk/.../article4718109.ece

It makes no sense.

btw, "offences" is not incorrect; it is a variation of spelling, used mainly by the British.

October 1, 2008 11:25 PM

About JeanneSager

Jeanne Sager is a writer who lives in upstate New York with her husband, daughter, a dog and too many cats. She refuses to believe motherhood comes with pumpkin appliqued sweaters, and she';s not ready to apologize for having only one child. She writes about raising her kid in her own hometown and the mom stuff she's not embarrassed to own at her blog, Inside Out (http://jeannesager.blogspot.com), she's contributing editor of Grand Magazine, and she's a regular essayist here on Babble

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage