Strollerderby

They Say: Drop the Hamsters, Kids, and Get Back in the Bubble

Posted by Madeline Holler

I'll admit petting zoos aren't my favorite. And I sometimes shudder thinking about the iguana that roams freely in my daughter's classroom. The germs! The bacteria! The salmonella!

So on the one hand, I'm ready to jump on board with this latest recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics: no exotic pets for kids. Exotic, incidentally, includes hamsters.

On the other hand, I like the idea of kids and pets.

The reason kiddie doctors want you to get rid of the animals and send your kids back to the bubble are (1) disgusting bacteria and (2) bites and scratches. They say kids under 5 are particularly vulnerable.

From Yahoo!

For example, about 11 percent of salmonella illnesses in children are thought to stem from contact with lizards, turtles and other reptiles, Pickering said. Hamsters also can carry this germ, which can cause severe diarrhea, fever and stomach cramps.

Salmonella also has been found in baby chicks, and young children can get it by kissing or touching the animals and then putting their hands in their mouths, he said.

One doctor recently treated an infant who got salmonella from the family pet iguana that was allowed to roam the house (my stomach's turning just thinking about it). After four weeks of treatment, the kid is doing fine.

The docs say to think twice about any pets for those under 5. And also to put a big emphasis on hand-washing.

I'm all for the handwashing and think exotic pets are weird and totally overrated in homes. But I also have a hard time thinking of hamsters as exotic. Also, this feels like another way we're over-protecting kids. Though under 5, it makes sense. Still, what about older siblings who always have to wait for the younger ones to grow up?

What do you think? Ever gotten sick from your pet? Think you'll get rid of your hamster now? Did you hop on board the hedgehog fad?


Photo: Yahoo!

 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Larissa said:

My 7 year old daughter has 2 pet rats and we have a standing rule that you have to wash your hands after handling then, giving them food or petting them.  They don't like to be out of their cage so they don't get handled very much but she likes to pet them and talk to them and it is her job to make sure they have food and to tell me when they need water.  

We're going to be hatching chicks as part of a community farm project, so it is good to know that salmonella is a risk, we'll be as vigilant with the chickies as we are with the rats.

October 6, 2008 4:14 PM
 

Knitty said:

How utterly amazing that for generations children survived living on farms and interacting with "exotic" animals as part of their daily lives -- without antibacterial soap/spray/suits, even!

These fear-mongering doctors should be pleased by today's news that animals are going extinct at a record pace.  Soon, the world will be utterly, perfectly sterile, and then our children will finally be "safe."

October 6, 2008 6:56 PM
 

Shannon LC Cate said:

We're putting off pets until they're both over 5 anyway, because I don't want the sole care-taking responsibility.  So, fortunately, moot point for us!

October 6, 2008 8:14 PM
 

erni said:

I don't think it's just a matter of protecting the kids, it's also about protecting the animals. I had a lot of friends growing up with stories about squeezing a hamster so hard it's eye popped out, to being so disgusted at a hamster for peeing on their hand that they threw it at a wall (and died). Under 5 is just too young to have that kind of physical power over something that you can so easily maim and kill.

October 7, 2008 2:07 PM
 

Effective Nancy said:

As a former zookeeper and longtime exotic pet owner, I have to say that I feel this is just another in a long line of smears against small exotics in the home. You know what counts as exotic? Anything that's not a cat or a dog. Seriously. Banning exotics means no more hamsters, gerbils, guinea pigs, parakeets, finches, and fish. Really? Is that the bandwagon worth jumping aboard?

For all those kids who, for reasons of space, allergies, time, and/or other physical limitations can't have dogs or cats, pets of the "exotic" persuasion can be a wonderful means of connecting with nature and relieving stress, learning responsibility and developing a sense of their importance to the environment. Banning small animals from homes with children--or, as many legislators would do, altogether--would cause further disconnection of our kids from the natural world. You can bet I'm not letting my kid touch my small lizards anytime soon, but she loves to see them, and I'm sure lots of other kids can benefit from similar experience.

Thanks to Knitty and erni for pointing out additional issues relating to kids and animals. Honestly, you'd think we were a nation of idiots, having to be told as adults that handwashing's a necessity after touching ANYTHING unsanitary. And that goes for the cats and dogs, too. When I was pregnant and working at the zoo, it was the cats I couldn't keep working in my "delicate" condition--not the bats, the mongooses, the snakes, even the monkeys. Exotics (and livestock) themselves are no more inherently dangerous than cats or dogs.

October 7, 2008 5:53 PM
 

AllisonWonder said:

Really? They have iguanas roaming in the classroom? Seems risky to me.

That said, I'd get my kids a rat (we've had them before, and they bite less frequently than hamsters do) or a hermit crab in a few years. They'd need to be careful with any pet. No lizards or turtles until they're old enough to not be putting their hands in their mouths, though.

October 18, 2008 12:33 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage