Strollerderby

No Child Left Behind Sets Impossible Goals

Yet another of the Bush administration’s chickens has come home to roost, this time in the arena of early education. The No Child Left Behind law has begun creating problems for schools that are not unlike the balloon payments dogging many homeowners.

This past year, more schools failed to meet the federal law’s testing requirements than ever before, in large part because, for many states, NCLB required relatively small improvements in the first few years, followed by gigantic leaps in the next few years.

In California, for instance, many schools were making good progress, increasing test scores by about 3 percent a year. But this year, these solid schools are required to up student performance by a whopping 11 percent; for most of them, it has proven impossible. One study estimated that every single elementary school in California would fail to meet the NCLB requirements by 2014, the year in which the law aims to have every American school achieve 100 percent proficiency in math and reading—a goal which many experts have long argued is impossible.

“And they’re asking for another 11 percent increase next year and the next, and that’s where I’m saying I just don’t know how,” said a California school principal (pictured). “I’m spending sleepless nights.”

Perhaps most worrisome, NCLB (unintentionally) mandates harsher punishments for schools in states with harder tests and higher academic standards; schools with lower standards, on the other hand, stand a better chance of meeting NCLB’s improvement requirements.

School administrators have been counting on Congress to change the law to reflect more realistic standards of achievement. But with war, environmental degradation, and economic disaster to contend with, it’s unlikely that early education laws will be seriously revisited anytime soon.

Photo: New York Times


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Manjari said:

NCLB is incredibly harmful and stupid. When I taught in the Philadelphia public school system, a principal would instruct teachers which children to focus their attention on so the school could meet their required improvement! So the kids who were testing almost proficient were supposed to improve just enough to help the school make safe harbor. What about the kids who had a long way to go to be proficient? They don't need attention, I guess. Bush's program should have been entitled So Many Children Left Behind Because I Don't Care About Education or Kids with a Socioeconomic Disadvantage and I'm too Stupid to be Making these Decisions (SMCLBBIDCAEKSDSMD).

October 14, 2008 8:04 AM
 

Vicki Glass said:

In the Memphis City Schools we refer to No Child Left Behind as No Teacher Left Standing. It is the worst thing  I have seen in my thirty-four years of teaching. It's a crying shame when a child can't color an Autumn picture or make a scarecrow because there isn't a state standard being addressed.I have always enjoyed teaching, however, the overload of work has taken all the fun out of school for both the students and teachers.

October 14, 2008 9:11 PM

About Hannah Tennant-Moore

Hannah Tennant-Moore is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer whose work has appeared or is forthcoming in Best Buddhist Writing (2008); The Sun; Guantanamo: Inside the Prison, Outside the Law; Tricycle; Turning Wheel (as the winner of the Young Writers Award); and elsewhere.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage