Strollerderby

Should Angelina Stop Nursing the Kids?

Posted by Madeline Holler

Does Angelina Jolie's role as a sex symbol mean she shouldn't breastfeed her babies? Or if she does continue, does it mean she shouldn't go publishing pictures of herself doing it? Does she owe her public the fantasy that those boobs belong to them, not her hungry little son and daughter?

Seems there's a bit of controversy in the splashy "W" magazine cover shots of her

From Reuters:

... But while breast-feeding support groups and moms celebrated Jolie's public statement, one expert said the picture felt like voyeurism, especially given Jolie's sex symbol status in movies like "Wanted" and "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider".

"The response from moms we have seen is that if someone as popular, beautiful and together as Angelina is breast-feeding her children, it inspires other women to do so themselves," said Dr Shannon Fox, a psychotherapist with the www.Momlogic.com website.

Little is seen in the picture of the act of breast-feeding. It shows Jolie smiling, while a tiny hand is just visible at bottom of the frame.

But Fox said the cover photo sends a second message.

"The problem is that she is also an international sex symbol. So whether or not she says 'This is a beautiful way of nurturing my baby', every man who sees that photo will see those breasts as sexual."

Really? Guys, is this true? Does this photo of Jolie contradict all the arguments that breastfeeding isn't a sex act, rather the world's easiest breakfast/lunch/dinner/snack? I feel like if she was pouting and doing that heavy-eyelid thing she does in every other photo of her, there'd be a mixed message. But she looks happy. Happy and content and like every other woman whose partner said "smile for the camera, sweetie!"

Related Posts

Angelina Buys Her Kid a Knife. What's Next, Maddox Jolie, Tomb Raider?

Angelina Jolie Breastfeeding Photo HERE!

Photo: W magazine


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

froggemom said:

WTF?!  How is this beautiful photo sexual?  You know, people can find anything sexual or titillating...anything.  Some people don't post photos of their kids on the internet for fear of child predators/pedophiles.  I figure that it is just as likely for some wacko to see us at the market and have some kind of fantasy/whatever from that experience.  

But back to the point...Angelina should breastfeed her babies wherever and whenever and for however long she wants.  People can just shut their pie holes about it.  I am proud that she has this cover shot.  Angelina rocks!

October 13, 2008 6:31 PM
 

PAgent said:

Life is rarely black and white, clear-cut and unambiguous. Every father has a difficult transition when his darling little girl starts to develop breasts and hips, and boys start to notice her. She will always be his little girl, and yet she is becoming a sexual creature.

By the same token, women can be beautiful when they're breastfeeding their children, no doubt. But is it wrong to think they might retain some sexuality as well? Moms don't turn in their libido at the delivery room door (well, some do, but that's another topic).

As for dads, it's absurd to expect a man to suddenly cease to find a woman's breasts fascinating simply because there happens to be a baby attached to one of them now. You need to be sensitive to the situation, respect the mother, and acknowledge that right now They Belong To The Baby. But stop liking them? Far from it.

My 2 cents.

October 13, 2008 6:38 PM
 

anne05 said:

It's a beautiful, intimate shot. The idea that once a sex symbol, only a sex symbol, is quite disturbing. Jolie, like all women, has many facets to her life and career. I like that she's not ashamed to publicly breastfeed and to use her body in a natural way. I don't think any more thought needs to go into it than that.

October 13, 2008 6:42 PM
 

Shannon LC Cate said:

I don't get it--who cares if people find it sexy?  Her babies still find it nutritious.  What difference does it make whether or not somebody gets off on it?

October 13, 2008 6:56 PM
 

mombo said:

I agree with anne05. Must we ONLY be one thing or another? The madonna or

the whore, no complexity allowed...it's absolutely absurd. The expert in question sounds a little jealous, like the only poster woman for nursing should be some stereotypically rumpled, crunchy-granola earth momma.

October 13, 2008 7:00 PM
 

km said:

Is she really still nursing, though?  I mean, she has new (post-baby) tattoos.  Granted, the risk of infection from tattoos is minimal, but still--who would take that chance?  

Maybe I'm just jealous, because I have a tattoo gift certificate hanging on my fridge, just waiting for the day I stop nursing my youngest son.

October 13, 2008 7:35 PM
 

Downtown.mom said:

I love that she is on the cover breast feeding!

People should be comfortable with the idea and sight of a mother feeding her child. I hate the idea that women should have to be forced into a closed room or smother their baby's head with a blanket in order to breastfeed. It is a natural and beautiful thing, and it's the child's FOOD!

I am shocked that there are still people out there that need to get over their fear of breasts - In Vancouver, just recently, a mother was asked to "hide" in a fittingroom while breastfeeding because it made some customers uncomfortable (www.cbc.ca/.../bc-h-m-breastfeeding-protest-vancouver.html).

This is absurd in town where being topless (as a woman) is totally legal. With breastfeeding it's not like you can even see anything when a baby is attached. What's wrong with a little boob here and there?

October 13, 2008 11:10 PM
 

Shannon said:

I hate to be the one to break it to those men, but those breasts don't belong to them. They don't belong to Brad. They don't belong to her babies. They belong to her and it's her choice what to do with them, no matter how others react.

I am not a big fan of Brangelina but I actually thought this photo was really tasteful and beautiful. Brad is a good photographer!

October 14, 2008 7:38 AM
 

chyna823 said:

I think that Angelina may be getting tired of being seen as only a sex symbol and is trying to break out of that image. Perhaps being seen feeding her baby will help the public see her as a more complex person and help her maintain her career as she gets older.

Regarding the Vancouver story: I guess I'm not surprised anymore that women are being told not to breastfeed in public, but what really surprises me is when the mothers comply! I breastfed in public all the time (it is possible to be discreet about it) and if anyone ever told me I had to go into a bathroom or cover my kid's head with a blanket, they'd get a firm and decisive "No." End of discussion.

October 14, 2008 9:26 AM
 

Brett Singer said:

I had to look realllly close at that photo before I could even tell there was breastfeeding going on. And I only looked because I wanted to see what the fuss was about. Everyone needs to calm down.

October 14, 2008 12:11 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage