Strollerderby

UPDATE: Mom Says She Won't Burn Library Book, Still Wants it Censored

Posted by JeanneSager

The Portland area mom who prompted an outrage over her plan to burn the book her thirteen-year-old son borrowed from his high school library has relented. She won't burn it, but she's still calling for the book to be censored.

Taffey Anderson said she was angry when she made her inflammatory (only teeny weeny little pun intended) comments. She told a Portland newspaper she'll return the book, but she's still making her case for keeping the Book of Bunny Suicides out of the hands of "less mature" students. She wants it held behind the desk in the library for the librarian to decide who may or may not borrow the book.  

Isn't that still censorship?

 

Original Post below:

Remember all those banned book posts on Strollerderby a few weeks back? How mediaval all those book burners sounded? Turns out she's alive and well and living in the Portland area.

Yup, an Oregon mom is threatening to burn a book her son checked out of his high school library.

The Book of Bunny Suicides is actually the first in a series of three graphic novels by British author/illustrator Andy Riley, a guy who's been dubbed the British Gary Larson. Subtitled "little fluffy rabbits who just don't want to live anymore," the book is black comedy at its best. Each page shows a hand-drawn bunny in a position that could very well end in his death  - although that's never actually seen, and often the means to an end aren't immediately apparent. Take page ine - a line drawing of a bunny with a rope around its neck, and the other end tied to the minute hand on a giant clock tower.

So, no blood and guts. No sex. No drugs. No cursing. And it makes you have to think . . . bad for kids, definitely bad.

Taffey Anderson's now holding hostage the book her son borrowed from the Central Linn High School in Halsey, Ore. She wants the issue reviewed by the school district, but she won't even hand the copy over for the principal to view. Instead, she says she's going to burn it. The school principal says that's too bad - the school will have to buy another copy and fine the family for the cost. If Anderson doesn't pay, her son will lose the privilege of taking books out of the library. His mother has already warned she'll burn the school's second copy.

Let's review the list of things she's teaching her son: Borrow things and don't give them back. Destroy that which isn't yours. Threaten and blackmail when you don't get your way.

And a book of cranky bunnies is going to warp this kid?

Image:

Related Posts:

Banned Books Week: R.L. Stine's Goosebumps

Banned Books Week: Shel Silverstein

Hey Sarah Palin, Make Your Kids Go to School

Do You Tell Your Kids to Fight Back?

Pit bulls and kids: Scared or Perfectly Comfortable?


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Phil said:

Man... I mean, I question the wisdom of a high school library having that book. But that's mostly out of a sense that a high school library can do better - even in that general genre. (I have a strict "No more suicidal picture books until you've finished your Edward Gorey" policy) There seems no reason for the library to have that book.

But that shouldn't be the test, of course. The test should be if there's a reason for the library not to have the book. And for high schoolers, there clearly isn't. A ninth grader is perfectly able to understand what the book is parodying, and to understand what is going on in the book. I mean, if it were an elementary school library? Yes. Of course, get that book out of it. But on the high school level? If kids don't understand what's going on in that book, that book is the least of the problems with the reading material the school has been providing them.

October 22, 2008 10:41 AM
 

erni said:

British Gary Larson? What? His work is completely unrelated to anything Gary Larson ever made. That doesn't even make sense. You made that up.

October 22, 2008 10:55 AM
 

EG said:

Making suicide funny isn't something I generally support.  I know, I'm WAY to un-cool and conservative for Babble.

I also don't support burning books, banning books, or refusing to return what you borrowed, but I can see how seeing my child with the book would incite many different emotions, most of them negative.

October 22, 2008 10:57 AM
 

Esme said:

erni look at the review on Amazon.com and you'll see that someone does call him a British Gary Larson.

I think it's insane that someone would burn a book in this day and age for it's contents.  This woman needs some serious help.  

October 22, 2008 11:10 AM
 

troll said:

Thanks for bringing this book to attention!  I haven't seen it before.  I'm going to order it from Amazon tonight to give to my 15 year old niece for Christmas.  She'll love it!

October 22, 2008 11:21 AM
 

Zach said:

Thank you crazy lady!  I now have a bunch of sweet books to add to my Christmas list :)

October 22, 2008 11:23 AM
 

Mamallama said:

I appreciate the mom's sense of responsibility to her kid's values, morals, etc.  But she's definitely lost the forest for the trees and clearly any sense of reason she may or may not have possessed.  High schoolers can appreciate irony and sarcasm all too well....maybe the mom should try it.

October 22, 2008 12:04 PM
 

Em said:

1) This book is not a "graphic novel" - there is no plot, just a bunch of funny cartoons.

2) The book is amusing, and I don't find it offensive in the least. I think it really needs to be seen to be understood. It really doesn't make suicide funny, like EG fears. But, I can see that perhaps some people may be offended by it, and I'm cool with that.

3) Burning books? Really? Just tell the kid that you don't approve of that kind of material, and make him take it back to the library (or take it back yourself). Yeesh.

October 22, 2008 12:23 PM
 

Knitty said:

And right here in Portland, too.  How embarrassing... I always think of these nutters living in some red-state wasteland, not around the corner.

October 22, 2008 12:44 PM
 

feefifoto said:

She's just bitter because someone had the poor taste to name her "Taffy."

October 22, 2008 1:57 PM
 

J said:

I will agree wholeheartedly that the mom is handling this extremely poorly.  But suicide is NEVER something to joke about.  It just isn't funny, and it isn't something that needs to be in a school library.  

October 22, 2008 4:15 PM
 

maeby said:

i bought this book for a friend. i think its funny!

although i dont understand why its in a school library

October 22, 2008 4:35 PM
 

hand said:

I might have a similarly troubled reaction to such a book if someone in my family had committed suicide, or if I or one of my children had ever contemplated suicide....

Or if I deeply loved bunnies....

November 3, 2008 2:39 PM
 

Mike Adamick (Cry It Out!) said:

I'm glad she took it down a notch. But yeah, her new plan also sounds like censorship -- just with fewer flames.

November 3, 2008 3:43 PM
 

leahsmom said:

I understand the inclinations of those who are troubled by making light of suicide - as someone with a family member who took her own life, I feel some of the hurt that comes with poking fun at it.  But the whole point of free speech is that people get to make fun of things in offensive or even hateful ways (not that I'm calling Bunny Suicides either of those) and that we have to deal with the discomfort this causes. We can deal with that by speaking out about how we are hurt - by making our own speech, and by furthering dialogue.  But we don't get to deal with it by telling other people they can't make fun, or be offensive or hateful.  I'm okay with that situation, myself.

November 3, 2008 4:25 PM
 

rustyMLS said:

Research shows that the more a child reads, the better reader he becomes, and also that it doesn't matter what he reads. (That seems counterintuitive, I know.)

As school librarians, my colleagues and I know that you don't make readers out of non-readers by giving them War and Peace. Getting kids into a library is a battle; getting them to check out and read anything is a bigger battle; and getting them to check out and read anything for pleasure (not assigned reading) is the biggest battle.

School librarians in most states are professional educators, with the same training as classroom teachers plus a masters degree that covers many topics, like how to evaluate and select books and other materials that meet the recreational and informational needs of the library's users.

The school district in question hopefully has a policy and process for challenging library materials, and I hope that the district is asking this woman to submit her complaint formally.

November 4, 2008 12:13 PM

About JeanneSager

Jeanne Sager is a writer who lives in upstate New York with her husband, daughter, a dog and too many cats. She refuses to believe motherhood comes with pumpkin appliqued sweaters, and she';s not ready to apologize for having only one child. She writes about raising her kid in her own hometown and the mom stuff she's not embarrassed to own at her blog, Inside Out (http://jeannesager.blogspot.com), she's contributing editor of Grand Magazine, and she's a regular essayist here on Babble

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage