Strollerderby

Should DirecTV Go Around Reincarnating Dead Child Stars?

Posted by Jen Chaney

We're all familiar with those clever movie-related commercials DirecTV runs on television, the ones that take a famous scene from a film like "Aliens" or "Back to the Future" and turn the characters into shills for satellite television. (Okay, they sound less clever when I describe them that way.)

A few weeks ago, DirecTV started airing a new commercial, one that riffs on the 1982 horror classic "Poltergeist." But here's the part that's really creepy: Heather O'Rourke -- the girl who played Carol Anne in the movie and, sadly, died at the age of 12 due to a heart attack brought on by septic shock -- appears in the ad. Watch below and you'll see what I mean.

Even though it's supposed to look like a scene from the 26-year-old movie, the spot subtly implies that O'Rourke is still with us. Which is a long way of saying: This commercial gives me a case of the heebie jeebs. And I'm not the only one. Bloggers and others have been whipping up a frothy brew of Internet outrage over this clip during the past few weeks.

"I think it’s in poor taste," writes this blogger at San Diego City Beat.

"Truly declasse," says slashfilm.

"I just think a dead child should be off limits," adds a commenter at Entertainment Weekly's PopWatch blog.

Reportedly, O'Rourke's mother, Kathleen, approved the ad. So one could argue that if it's fine with the O'Rourke family, it should be fine with us. And it's a valid point that this is footage from a movie in which O'Rourke played a character, so it lives on in a different realm -- so to speak -- than the actual Heather O'Rourke.

I hear all that. Yet I still can't shake the fact that there is something spooky and altogether ooky about this. Maybe I'm just freaked because "Poltergeist" scared the bodily juices out of me when I was a kid. But the bottom line is that I don't think a deceased star, especially one who died so young, should be resuscitated solely to sell premium and HD channels to the masses.


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Shannon said:

I've seen a lot on this topic. I think it would've been different if she was doing the ad, but her part is just as it is in the film. What's the difference between this and the movie rerunning all the time?

October 23, 2008 11:50 AM
 

Dad said:

Yeah, uhm, not sure it really matters if the mother approved it or not.. I believe the clip belongs to the company that made the movie, and they really could have done anything they wanted with it. I believe the "getting approval from the mother" was just a nice gesture.

Besides, what's the difference between this and using a clip of a dead adult? You may say they are exploiting the child, but that could be said about letting children act in movies in the first place...

October 23, 2008 1:38 PM

About Jen Chaney

Jen Chaney is the movies editor and a DVD columnist for washingtonpost.com. Her byline has appeared in The Washington Post, People magazine, USA Today and the Utne Reader as well as various other newspapers around the country. She is the mother of a one-year-old boy, who has not yet learned the word Xanadu. But he will. Trust us, he will.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage