Strollerderby

Babble Talk: How Do We Know When We Are Scaring Our Kids?

Posted by Jen Chaney

Perhaps you saw this essay called "Creep Show," written by Kevin Keck, about a six-year-old who is fascinated by zombies, Freddy Krueger and assorted other horror-rific things. (You'd remember if you saw it; it's the essay accompanied by the image of a kid who looks a hell of a lot like Robert Smith from The Cure.)

Keck writes about his stepson Gavyn's obsessions with an appropriate mixture of acceptance and concern. He knows his boy is a gentle, good kid. But he also wants to shield him from some of the scarier movies and TV shows in which Gavyn has a keen interest. He's allowed to watch "Shaun of the Dead" and even "Scream," but not, under any circumstances, "Saw." All of which raises a question that strikes me as particularly pertinent at Halloween: How do we know when we're exposing our kids to something too frightening for them to handle?

I have seen examples at both ends of the "freaking out the kids" spectrum. On the exposing-them-to-too-much side, I once sat in a movie theater behind parents who brought their five-year-old daughter to see "Saving Private Ryan." The pigtailed little girl was curled up into a trembling, petrified ball after 30 seconds of the opening battle scene at Normandy, and I don't blame her. It was too intense for most of the adults in the multiplex, let alone a child. And in that case, mom and dad didn't have the luxury of saying, "It's just a movie." War is real and even the film version of it is no place for a kindergartner to visit.

But I also think it's equally dangerous to be overly protective, too. I know parents who wouldn't let their kids read books like "Where the Wild Things Are," even when their sons and daughters were of elementary school age, because they thought such stories would scare them. Obviously we don't want to terrorize the little ones, but assuming they can't handle anything even vaguely dark also shields them from some of the most wonderful, imaginative movies and books ever created. Other parents won't even take kids trick-or-treating out of fear of potential fear. And that seems sad to me, too.

Ultimately, Moms and Dads know their children better than anyone and, in theory anyway, should know what's best for them. In most cases, I believe they do. At the same time, I think there are things we can all agree on.

1. You shouldn't take a kid to see "Saving Private Ryan" or "Saw."

2. It's OK to see "The Wizard of Oz" prior to the age of 16.

3. Even scary movies, stories or moments can immediately seem less terrifying if mom and dad are present and talking to their children about what they are seeing. 

Keck pointed out that he doesn't let Gavyn watch anything creepy by himself. So while I might not let my own six-year-old see "Scream," I can tell that Keck is trying to be a responsible parent and look for cues from his child about what's too much. Sometimes that's the best and only thing one can do, especially when your son really, really wants to grow up to be a zombie slayer. 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

leahsmom said:

I think that you can't protect kids from being scared just by keeping them away from Maurice Sendak - kids are going to be scared of something, because human beings are scared of things. It's part of our psychological makeup.  So I'd rather read Where the Wild Things are, or watch the Wizard of Oz (I was terrified of those monkeys as a kid) with my child, and talk to her about scary things, why we get scared, and some things we can do when we are scared (talk to someone we love, for example) then think I'm protecting her from it and leave her to deal with scared feelings all by herself by sending the message - it's not OK for anyone to be scared, we have to pretend to be happy all the time.

October 29, 2008 11:38 AM
 

JeanneSager said:

My parents tried their best to shield me from certain things (not Maurice Sendak - they weren't that protective, sheesh), but I was a curious kid. When they watched rated R movies in the living room, I would sneak out of my bed (where they thought I was sleeping) and curl up in the hallway. When I had questions, I couldn't ask because I was hiding from them the fact that I was even watching them. I'd advocate against Saw too, and in our house, probably Scream and Shaun of the Dead even (in our house, no judgement for Kevin Keck), but watching movies with me so she can ask me questions when she's concerned is the way we'll go as we start to break out of the G and PG genre.

October 29, 2008 11:46 AM
 

snorkmaiden said:

When I was 5, I had horrible nightmares and fears of our house burning down for months after I watched an episode of "Little House on the Prairie" where the farmhouse burned down.  I also got nightmares from a segment of "Sesame Street" where a bunch of cars drove toward a little blue cartoon guy until he said "stop."  Moral of story: if your kid is going to have nightmares, he'll have them no matter what he's exposed to.

October 29, 2008 3:25 PM

About Jen Chaney

Jen Chaney is the movies editor and a DVD columnist for washingtonpost.com. Her byline has appeared in The Washington Post, People magazine, USA Today and the Utne Reader as well as various other newspapers around the country. She is the mother of a one-year-old boy, who has not yet learned the word Xanadu. But he will. Trust us, he will.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage