Strollerderby

Babywearing Moms New Pain in Motrin's Side

Posted by JeanneSager

An ad that debuted on Motrin's Website during International Babywearing Week (which ends tomorrow in case any of you want to make a sling cake and celebrate) has the mom-blogosphere a-buzzing. They're giving me a headache.

Babywearing moms around the nation say the pain reliever is picking on them for choosing perhaps the most "attachment-oriented" of all attachment parenting methods. The ad says wearing your baby seems to be in fashion and "in theory, it's a great idea." It even lists some of the reasons so many moms have run out to buy a carrier or sling, from "going hands-free" to the various places you can prop your papoose (back, side, front . . ).

But the focus of the ad? It's on moms who experience pain while babywearing. ("These things put a ton of strain on your back, your neck, your shoulders. Did I mention your back?!") I know, total shocker coming out of a company that sells . . . wait for it . . .pain relievers. Did you really think they were going to spend money an ad telling you their product isn't necessary?

The moms have been tweeting away on Twitter about the need to boycott Motrin's parent company, Johnson & Johnson. They're using words like "disgusts me," "insulting," and "absolutely infuriating."

I found one sentence of the whole thing a little condescending - "it totally makes me look like an official mom." Being an official mom takes more than a look or a baby sling. But the rest of it? Talking about putting up with the pain because it's a "good kind of pain," and looking "tired and crazy"? That's pretty darn realistic for some moms. Notice I said "some," not all. In fact, a lot of babywearing moms report trial and error before finding a position that worked for mom AND for baby. For some, it just never works - despite multiple attempts, they're not going to find a carrier that makes the baby weigh less or makes the baby less likely to move around and throw them off kilter. I tried two different carriers and never was able to get the hang of it - eventually ending up in physical therapy thanks to the enormous strain put on my back first by my pregnancy and later by carrying my daughter. When the therapist suggested I just "not carry my daughter," I laughed in her face. 

What I find condescending are the moms out there who insist that this will scare of would-be babywearers. Motherhood isn't glamorous. And we do sacrifice plenty for our kids (so do dads, by the way, who carry their kids in their arms, in carriers, in slings . . . ). But considering how many of us know childbirth is going to hurt and sign up for the whole she-bang anyway, I think we deserve a little more credit. 

Image: Motrin

Related Posts:

Equally Shouldering the Parenting Duties - Literally

Grandma Serves as Surrogate, Gives Birth to Triplet Granddaughters

The Shape of a Mother: The Real Us In All Our Unglorious Glory

Baby Boy Developed in Mom's Intestine Delivered Via Cesarean

Mom Ready to Deliver Baby After First Ever Ovary Transplant

 

Do Men Really Have a Pregnancy Fetish?


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

gpgirl said:

I agree that the moms complaining about Motrin are being condescending. Why do people think they need to make things look super easy for us to want to do them? I used a carried when my son was an infant, and it gave me a lot of freedom. However, it also gave me a lot of pain, and I took ibuprofen on a regular basis.

This also reminds me of when I was pregnant and took a class on breastfeeding. They made it look so easy, and told us all how natural it all is. When I had my son and had such a hard time, I thought I should give up because I obviously was way too stupid to nurse. However, after talking to other moms, I realized that a lot of women had trouble nursing, and had to really put an effort to learn how to do it. I really think it is better to let parents know what could go wrong, so they don't feel totally incompetent when things don't go perfectly.

November 17, 2008 1:37 PM
 

gpgirl said:

OK, I finally found the ad on Youtube. (Motrin took it off of its site.) I really did not find it offensive at all. Wow, it actually said that mom should think about her own pain for a minute - what a concept! Can someone out there please explain why this is offensive.

November 17, 2008 1:40 PM
 

Adventures In Babywearing said:

I personally didn't like the tone of the ad. I also am a babywearer & blog about babywearing so it's important to me that Moms & Dads do wear their babies in a way that does not cause them pain. I can see how the ad might upset some Moms and I can also see how Motrin did not intend to offend in any way. I just wish they would have consulted with an experienced babywearing Mom first. Maybe they did? But I really doubt it.

Steph

November 17, 2008 3:29 PM
 

Mike Adamick (Cry It Out!) said:

Motrin scared me away from carrying my child. If I didn't take my parenting advice from 30-second commercials from the pharmaceutical industry, I don't know how I'd make it.

November 17, 2008 8:06 PM
 

Fiona said:

I have two problems with the ad. The first (and more minor) is that the tone is condescending and implies that babywearing is all about fashion.

The second is that it suggests that pain from babywearing is an acceptable part of motherhood, and that a painkiller is the answer, when if you are having regular pain from your baby carrier, it's probably actually causing harm and a masking the symptoms will allow you to damage your body more.

November 18, 2008 10:26 AM
 

gpgirl said:

Fiona, I tried so many baby carriers. I finally settled on the Ergo, which gave me the least pain, but it still was not pain-free. I had a very large baby, and I am pretty small, so maybe it was a size issue. But that ibuprofen really came in handy, and I have no long-lasting effects from the baby-wearing.

Like Mike says, do we really think there are parents who won't use a carrier because of this ad?

I used a carrier because it made my life so much easier. I never though much about the bonding, etc. that the attachment parenting people talk about. Sometimes I feel we take things that make our lives easier as parents and turn it into a movement. Then, when someone says anything that is not totally for this movement (as some people see in this ad) and it becomes a big deal. Is it that we think that if we say we do something for our own convenience, that makes us look like selfish parents?

I know I am getting a little off-topic, but maybe someone can help me with this.

November 18, 2008 12:07 PM
 

gpgirl said:

btw, sorry for the poor grammar/typos.

November 18, 2008 12:25 PM
 

Melissa said:

First there were breastfeeding extremists, now there are baby wearing extremists... it's nuts.  I "wore" my baby for a few months.  Once he could sit up, I was done.  He was too heavy.  And there's no way I'm carrying a walking child on my back.  That's what strollers are for.  

What's the big deal?  It is such a short period of time in your (and the child's) life.  The child will grow up happy either way.

November 26, 2008 1:25 PM

About JeanneSager

Jeanne Sager is a writer who lives in upstate New York with her husband, daughter, a dog and too many cats. She refuses to believe motherhood comes with pumpkin appliqued sweaters, and she';s not ready to apologize for having only one child. She writes about raising her kid in her own hometown and the mom stuff she's not embarrassed to own at her blog, Inside Out (http://jeannesager.blogspot.com), she's contributing editor of Grand Magazine, and she's a regular essayist here on Babble

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage