Strollerderby

Mother of Slain Boy Denied Right to Sue

Posted by Shannon LC Cate

The mother of an eight-year old boy shot and killed by the biological son of his foster parents was denied the right to sue the social workers responsible in the case.  According to the Joplin Globe:

"Braxton Wooden Jr. was shot in the head by Mark and Treva Gordon’s 14-year-old biological son, [Ethan] on June 2, 2005, during a game of “cops and robbers” with a handgun taken from a bedroom closet of the Gordons’ home.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis decided that because there was no evidence that the social worker and her supervisor had any knowledge of the presence of unsecured firearms in the home, the case did not rise to the standard of “conscience-shocking conduct” required to override a qualified immunity from lawsuits under which the Department of Social Services and state social workers operate."

When the social workers come to my house to do a six-month update of our foster license, they always ask "are any guns in your home in a locked cabinet?"  To which we reply that we have no guns in our home.  Every time I am shocked that a foster license is an option for gun-owners at all.  Call me a big-city elitist, but a I don't believe a locked cabinet would stop a determined 14-year old any more than a bedroom closet would.  And it's clear in this case that the 14-year old was determined to play with his parents' guns.  He lied to investigators at first, claiming the eight-year old had shot himself.  Later, other foster children who had stayed in the home testified that they had been chased by the boy more than once while he brandished "one or more of three handguns that were in the home" and had seen him loading and unloading the guns.

If the social workers aren't responsible for this tragedy, who is?  Because when the state takes the drastic step of removing a child from the home of his birth, it had better make sure that the place it puts that child is safer than home.  Protecting the professionals responsible for assuring this when they fail is not in the best interest of children.  Not only should this boy's mother be allowed to sue the state, she should be awarded huge punitive damages to teach the state a lesson.

See also:

The Trouble with Safe Haven Laws

Court Finds Fault with Many in Baby's Death

Arkansas Adoption Ban Passes

Bad Parent:  Why We Keep a Gun in the House

 

Image: Foster City


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Renee said:

We don't own a gun.  This case is tragic, and I wholeheartedly agree that the mother should be allowed to sue the state & the case workers.  Yet, to say categorically that anyone that does own a gun can't provide foster care seems to me pretty ridiculous to me.  Here in Pennsylvania, for example, that would automatically redline a whole lot of people from providing a service that is in short demand to begin with--people who use their firearms to hunt deer which they then use to supplement their food budget.  There actually are a whole bunch of options for gun owners (big and small--the guns, not the owners) to safely keep their weapons stashed away, including but not limited to combination lock safes & fingerprint scanners.

The question here isn't why the foster parents should have been allowed to foster with guns in the house.  The pertinent questions are did the social workers know there were guns in the house and did they take the appropriate steps to ensure those guns were safely stored.  In addition, I'd be very curious to know if there was anything in the files of the other children that at all intimated that there were problems with the biological son or that indicated the presence of unsecured guns in the house, period.  If any of these questions leave anything to be desired in the competence of the social workers--damn it to hell, they are liable for that child's death.

December 5, 2008 9:13 AM
 

rockin' grandma said:

Are the foster parents being sued? Have they been indicted for endangering the welfare of minors? Why did they have handguns in their house?

December 8, 2008 2:39 PM
 

Shannon LC Cate said:

rockin' grandma:

The foster parents settled out of court for about $100K which was divided about 3 equal ways between the mother, some siblings and the lawyers who represented the mother.  Certainly not a just ending if you ask me.

As for guns in the home, to be fair to other gun owners, these foster parents just left the guns in a closet.

But on the other hand, gun-ownership--period--is a proven risk to children in a home.

December 8, 2008 3:00 PM
 

Manjari said:

I am so upset by this. I think the state absolutely failed to keep that child safe. I can't even imagine how I would feel if my child was removed from my care, and was then KILLED. I am also wondering what the consequences are for that 14 year old boy, and whether he needs help or something.

December 8, 2008 9:58 PM

About Shannon LC Cate

Shannon LC Cate, PhD is a lesbian housewife and work-from-home mother of two girls via domestic, open, transracial adoption. They are both under five and already too brilliant and beautiful for their own good. Shannon lives, writes and assembles tricycles in Chicago, Illinois.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage