Strollerderby

Imagine No Religion? Or, Does Parenting Require Church?

Posted by Kate Tuttle

A recent Washington Post article looked at parents participating in a seminar for humanist parenting and saw a trend: communities of atheists and agnostics getting together to share values and inculcate those in their children, just as religious people do. Among those quoted in the article were some Boston-based parents and the humanist chaplain at Harvard, Greg Epstein, who has made a bit of a name for himself by suggesting that folks who eschew religion and a belief in a deity should nevertheless band together to do what religions have always done: build communities and sing songs. It goes on to cite data about church attendance over the average person's lifespan, during which (for most people) enforced churchgoing in childhood is replaced by church avoidance in one's years of single adulthood, followed by a return to the pew when kids start being born. For atheists, there are few places to provide that kind of family-based community. And when seeking like-minded other parents with whom to share the difficult years of childrearing, folks without a church can feel isolated -- in a very religious community, they may even be condemned for their beliefs. 

From the article:

A recent study found that many Americans associate atheists with negative traits, including criminal behavior and rampant materialism.

People often ask, "How do you expect to raise your children to be good people without religion?" said Dale McGowan, the seminar leader and author of "Parenting Beyond Belief." He suggested a retort like, "How do you expect to raise your children to be moral people without allowing them to think for themselves?"

As a lifelong atheist, I have a feeling I'm meant to read this with some combination of affirmation, relief and excitement, perhaps with my datebook at the ready so that I can attend the next seminar. And yet, I can't help feeling this is a movement (if it is a movement at all) to satisfy those still mourning the loss of whatever religion they were raised in. For people like me, who grew up in a milieu of acceptance (very liberal Judaism, or ethical culture, or Unitarian Universalism, where I spent all my Sunday-school years), a kind of pretend religion without mention of "god" sounds like vegetarians sitting around exchanging recipes for Tofurkey. Why not embrace your own ideas, have the courage of your convictions? As for me, I am a non-religious person who has never believed in a superntural being and I don't consider it a missing piece that needs filling with fake church. And besides, lots of us have our own secular houses of worship, whether it be Fenway Park, the public library, or a national forest. 

 

More by this author:

Death by Peanut: Epidemic or Urban Myth?
Is This Baby Obese? Aussie Mom Says No
Baby Nearly Starves to Death, Diluted Formula to Blame
Grandmother’s Right? Or Totally Obnoxious?
Health Scam: Crisis Pregnancy Centers
 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Bunny said:

It doesn't sound like these organizations are "fake church" so much as an attempt at forming community. I mean, really, where else does one find community in the modern world if you don't go to church? It sounds like a positive social movement to me (and, as churches tend to be politically influential, these atheist churches might go in that direction as well, balancing out the effect Christianity has on American political discourse).

December 30, 2008 5:41 PM
 

Joanie said:

It's a weird assumption that people who are agnostic or atheistic have no community.  I'd say the people I know quite easily gather around shared values -- we have theater groups, we volunteer together, we go hiking in the woods together, we make big dinners and watch old movies... Church is definitely a particular type of community, but an anti-church celebrating your non-belief in God, I don't know.  I'd rather celebrate my belief in people, nature, service and the like.  I'll skip the sermon.

December 30, 2008 8:29 PM
 

Nate said:

This is a very insightful article. I am glad people are talking about this, since many religious people believe that non-believers are immoral for lack of religion. This is clearly not so when you look at some facts, like being an immoral wacko does not any more likely make you non-religious. However atheists in some countries lack the background of community building that religions have supplied for thousands of years, the good news is I think us atheists will figure it out and do the religious people one better, we won't start wars over our beliefs.

January 9, 2009 1:30 PM

About Kate Tuttle

I'm raising a toddler and a teenager in a leafy suburb just outside Boston. In between having kids I've been an editor and writer, most recently with the African American National Biography and the late great Africana.com.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage