Strollerderby

Smackdown: A Book's a Book, No Matter How Small (or Annoying)

Posted by KeriF

When my 4-year-old son Declan was just a few months old, we had brunch with some family friends. Their son was whining for his stuffed rabbit, which he had left in the car. "[Whatever stuffed rabbit's name was] doesn't want to come out of the car," my friend explained to her son. "He's tired and just wants to rest." The kid didn't buy it, and who can blame him? He was a child, not an idiot.

That's why I try not to lie to my kids. And that's why I can't throw out any of the annoying books my kids love. Even if, like "Sheep in a Shop," the far inferior sequel to "Sheep in a Jeep," the meter is poor, the plot iffy, and the moral downright questionable (the sheep trade their wool for some birthday presents). I can't throw it away. I can't simply "misplace" it. Because I can't say, "'Snuggle Puppy'? Haven't seen it," if I know it's buried under leftover mac-n-cheese in the kitchen garbage can. I know I can't do this because I've tried, and I suck at it.

My feeble attempts at lying to my kids, no matter how trivial the matter, have failed miserably. When we went to the Renaissance Faire last summer, I told my sons before we left the house that (plastic toy) swords weren't allowed (as if!). Then when we got there and saw a sword on every leather-clad hip in the shire, I felt like an idiot and spent the better part of the day trying to talk my way out of it. But why? They're 4 and 3. I'm, er, significantly older than that. "Because I'm the parent, that's why," is trite because it's true. We're the grown-ups! We shouldn't have to lie to get our way. That's toddler territory.

So when 3-year-old Ronan wants to read "Curious George Goes to the Hospital" for the 11th time in a week and I simply cannot stomach all 187 pages of it (or at least that's what it feels like), I don't tell him that it's "gone missing." I simply tell him we've had enough George for one week and suggest we read my favorite book, "The Gruffalo." And if he starts to pitch a fit I simply offer the alternative: no book at all. "The Gruffalo" always wins.

The truth is, I find a lot of children's books annoying. Some of them just don't make a lot of sense to me. But that doesn't mean they don't make a lot of sense to my kids. The first time I read "Goodnight Moon," I thought to myself, "That's it? That's 'Goodnight Moon'? It doesn't even rhyme!" But my kids loved it. So I read it to them, and reread it to them, again and again and again, and they learned to recognize the book and smile when they heard the first words.

Now my kids love to read, and the inanity of "Snuggle Puppy" is balanced by the brilliance of John Lithgow's "The Remarkable Farkle McBride." And that's okay with me. Because I don't always want to read "Crime and Punishment." Sometimes I just want a little "Flowers in the Attic."

 

The Other Side:

 

More by this Author:


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

editors said:

The monkey's cute and all, but those Curious George books do indeed go on FOREVER.

January 6, 2009 4:53 PM
 

Amy said:

I hate Curious George Goes to the motherfu#king Hospital with the passion of a thousand Fabios.

I just had to get that off my chest.

Thanks,

Amy

January 6, 2009 7:59 PM
 

dreambeliever200 said:

ahhh....glorious VC Andrews...she can help you forget all of your worries by reminding you that other families are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more screwed up ;)

January 7, 2009 4:04 AM
 

Kendra said:

You know, a couple of months ago I decided "I'm going to "read" 'Where's Waldo' with my 3 year old like it is the most fabulous piece of literature ever" I asked for it by name at bed time, and waited for him to turn the pages (b/c if I went too fast, he always wanted to start over...three days later, he was over it. Haven't read that piece of $#!t since!

January 7, 2009 1:24 PM
 

JB said:

Why is this a two sided debate? This is one of the silliest pieces I've ever read on this site. Seriously. The comments on the side of the debate read like a bunch of whiney 5 yr olds wrote them.

We're all big boys and girls, easily put the book in a big pile and grab something else. My daughter has a LOT of books, partly due to the library and partly due to the fact that her father works in publishing. And she's only 2 1/2.

Do this. Put a giant stack of some of the child's favorites in front of you. Grab two they like and say ok "this one or this one". It's like a game and they'll choose. Just don't put the one you're tired of reading in that pile. They may not even notice.

As for getting annoyed with George, or Amelia Bedelia or who/whatever, you'll be thankful when ten years from now they actually LIKE to read and not care who they read as a toddler. And George books do NOT go on forever, jesus. They're about ten short pages long. We read five books every night to our kid. Some are quick, some are short. I don't complain. She loves it.

And no, toddler books don't have to be high art. Whatever entices them all the better.

January 8, 2009 9:21 AM
 

notperfectandokwithit said:

oh that one judgemental person who thinks they're doing a far superior job than you. You tickle me pink.

Curious George is the worst.

January 8, 2009 2:23 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage