Strollerderby

An Early C-Section Could Harm Your Baby

Posted by Jen Chaney

Deciding to have a Caesarean section at 37 weeks, when an infant is technically full-term, should be harmless, right? Wrong, according to a new study by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

The information in the study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine and reported by many media outlets, including the New York Times, says that babies born via C-section at 37 weeks are twice as likely to develop complications as children delivered via C-section at 39 weeks. At 38 weeks, the increase in medical risk is also higher, but only by 50 percent. In other words, it's safest to have that Caesarean at 39 or 40 weeks. Or, to put another spin on this data, women who elect to have C-sections a little ahead of the curve, primarily for reasons of convenience, are putting their kids at risk.

Of course, as we all have heard and read, more women have been doing just that in recent years. As the Times reports, 30 percent of deliveries in 2006 were "Cs," an increase of more than 20 percent over 10 years prior. 

Now, a lot of the blame for that gets placed on the moms, those "horrible control-freak women who just have to organize and schedule everything." But I suspect that, at least in some cases, OBs also bear some of the responsibility for encouraging women to go ahead and schedule the 'ol C because it's just as convenient for them as it is for the mom. At the least, doctors may not be discouraging women from taking that course of action.

Related Posts:

Pre-Term Elective C-Sections Are Dangerous: So Why Insure Them?

New Risks Associated with Elective Deliveries

They Say: Even Late Preemies at Higher Risk

Image: newyorktimes.com

In light of this new study, I wonder if we'll see a shift in that trend, both in terms of what OBs and their patients will allow. No matter how attached we are to our Blackberries and Google Calendars, we all want to deliver healthy babies. And this knowledge could very well change people's plans.

Given the information in this study, would you elect to have an early C-section or would you wait until that 39th or 40th week?


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

leahsmom said:

In my case, that's really tough news - many Type I diabetics are told that we need to have our babies at 38 weeks, because there is a higher risk that the baby won't survive - I guess our placentas don't last as long? I'm not quite sure I understand it, myself.  I mean, that seems like a pretty good reason to do it early - and I know diabetes makes a pregnancy high -risk to begin with, but it doesn't make the decisions any easier!

January 9, 2009 10:29 AM
 

j said:

I am sooo glad this report came out. I had full faith in my OB when my son was breech and a c section was scheduled at 37 weeks. Mind you this was my third baby & first c section. Awful, awful experience. Because of the c section, my son's lungs filled with fluid and he had an extended stay in the NICU. Apparently according to the hospital staff and OB and from what I read this happens a lot(?!) This is of no comfort when you are watching your tiny newborn struggle to breath. Our son had a particularly bad case with trouble breathing and inability to eat. Again, third baby, first time in the NICU. My other two kids weighed 8lbs 6oz. and 9lbs. 3oz. at full term. He was 7lbs. Not one to give unsolicited advice, nor do I usually comment a complete paragraph on a blog ;) but this is really something I wish I would have known about in order to make a more informed decision. I feel like I placed way to much trust in medical professionals. Sorry for such a long comment!

January 9, 2009 12:57 PM
 

D said:

I had a scheduled section, but didn't want it the two weeks early my OB advised.  Instead she agreed to wait until after my due date, so my daughter was born 2 days after her due date, a healthy 8lb 7oz.  I would advise any mom to ask for an elective section after/on the due date if they want; my OB had no problem with it!

January 21, 2009 12:30 PM

About Jen Chaney

Jen Chaney is the movies editor and a DVD columnist for washingtonpost.com. Her byline has appeared in The Washington Post, People magazine, USA Today and the Utne Reader as well as various other newspapers around the country. She is the mother of a one-year-old boy, who has not yet learned the word Xanadu. But he will. Trust us, he will.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage