My brother-in-law likes to joke that when his kids are
older, he'll install drug detectors in all the toilets in the house. At
least,
I think he's joking.
I assume he's joking because it seems wrong to me to be so
untrusting of your own kids. I like to think I would know if my kids were using
drugs, and plan on making it my business to know when the time comes. Relying
on drug tests to determine sobriety seems like abdicating parental
responsibility a bit.
Which is why I'm so turned off by the new GPS tracking
devices to use on our kids. The devices, which look like watches, are locked on
by the parents so they always know where their child is. And if the watch is
forcibly removed, the parents receive an alarm notification. Perfect safety,
right?
But as Michelle Hanson points out in her essay in The
Guardian,
maybe that's not such a great thing. Her argument is that once we get used to tracking
our children's every move, we won't be able to rest without knowing exactly
where our child is at every minute of every day.
My opposition is more basic: Aren't these really just
electronic leashes for kids? I wouldn't use an actual leash on my child, so why
would I use an electronic one? I have only seen such a leash used well once, by
my friend Sally who had to figure out a way to keep her 18-month old son close
by while nursing her newborn on outings. But to lead your kids around the zoo
on a leash because it's too much of a bother to keep track of them yourself? My
sister has five kids and manages to make it home from the zoo without losing
any.
To my mind, leashes of any kind are for animals, which
cannot control their impulses. It's our job as parents to teach our kids to
control their impulses, to not run into the middle of the street to get the
kickball or run off in the middle of the mall to find a candy store. Teaching
them that there will always be a leash there to pull them back from harm only
spells more danger for when the leash is there no longer.
I know the argument: if my child were abducted, I would wish
that he had been wearing a GPS device. But if my child was abducted, I'm sure
his abductor would find a way to remove the flimsy watch that tracked his every
move.
Which brings us to my brother-in-law's next big idea:
tracking chips implanted under the skin. The shelter cats I adopted years ago
had them, he argues, why not kids?
I think he's joking.
Related Posts: